1 / 34

Gender & Violence Sociology of Gender Conference

Gender & Violence Sociology of Gender Conference. Andrew Carvajal. All cartoons taken from www.cartoonbank.com. Rapist: what typically comes to mind. Who is the stereotypical rapist?. The Sexual Victimization of College Women.

Télécharger la présentation

Gender & Violence Sociology of Gender Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gender & Violence Sociology of Gender Conference Andrew Carvajal All cartoons taken from www.cartoonbank.com

  2. Rapist: what typically comes to mind... • Who is the stereotypical rapist?

  3. The Sexual Victimization of College Women A collaboration of the National Institute of Justice (NJS) and Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJN) Authors: Bonnie S. Fisher, Francis T. Cullen, Michael G. Turner U.S. Department of Justice – December 2000

  4. General Information • College women face a greater risk of rape and other forms of sexual assault than women in the general population, and women in a comparable age group • Results based on a phone surveys with a random sample of 4,446 college women from all over the U.S. • Sexual victimization measured as respondents’ answers to whether they had experienced a variety of situations during their college experience

  5. The Findings • 2.8 % of the sample had experienced either a completed rape (1.7%) or an attempted rape incident (1.1%) during the survey period • 1.8 % for rape and 1.3 % for attempted rape in undergraduates • 0.8% and 0% for non-undergraduates • However, projecting these numbers to a whole academic year, the estimated % of college girls who suffer full rape or attempted rape is 5% • Over the course of a degree (4 or 5 years) the % of completed or attempted rapes among women can climb to 20-25%

  6. Rates compared to non-college women

  7. More Findings • Most women don’t define the incidents construed as rape by the researchers, as rape themselves • Are researchers overstating the problem, or students understating it? • 15.5% of the women were sexually victimized during the academic year • Either through rape, attempted rape, or threat of rape

  8. More Findings

  9. When and where does victimization occur? • The vast majority of sexual victimizations occurred in the evening (after 6 p.m.) • 60% of on-campus rapes occurred in residences, 31% in other living quarters on-campus, and 10.3% in fraternities

  10. Relation with the Offender • 90% of the victims knew their offender

  11. Protective action • In both completed rape and sexual coercion, victims were less likely to take protective action • Using protective action might lead attempts to rape or coerce sex to fail • Fewer than 5% of full or attempted rapes were reported to law enforcement officials • Amongst the reasons cited were fear of receiving hostility from the police and the judicial system • 13.1 % of victims had been stalked since the start of the school year

  12. Varied Risks • 4 main factors consistently increased the risk of sexual victimization: • frequently drinking enough to get drunk • being unmarried • having been a victim of a sexual assault before the start of the school year • living on campus

  13. Verbal Victimization

  14. Visual Victimization

  15. So, who is the average rapist in our society?

  16. School shootings: A Gender Issue? • Is gender the most critical factor in the latest wave of school shootings?

  17. A School Shooter Profile • Following the shooting at Columbine the US Secret Service (2000) offered a report in which they said that there “is no profile” for school shooters • No profile???

  18. Barry Loukaitis; Feb 2 1996 White Boy http://img.photobucket.com

  19. Luke Woodham; Oct 1 1997 White Boy www.experts.about.com

  20. Michael Carneal; Dec 1st 1997 White Boy www. cnn.com

  21. Mitchell Johnson & Andrew Golden; March 24 1998 White Boys http://www.baptiststandard.com http://www.keystosaferschools.com

  22. Kip Kinkel; May 21 1998 White Boy http://www.jeremiahproject.com

  23. Eric Harris & Dylan Klebold; April 20 1999 http://www.olddoom.com www.nndb.com White Boys

  24. Andrew Williams; March 5 2001 White Boy http://news.bbc.co.uk

  25. John Jason McLaughlin; Sept 24 2003 White Boy www.kare11.com

  26. Eric Hainstock; Sept 29 2006 http://www.wrex.com White Boy

  27. No Profile? • Maybe it is harder to identify a profile when it is the “norm” • The white, heterosexual, male is often the trait that most often goes unnoticed in our analyses of social problems • It is invisible (see Kimmel’s “What about the Boys”)

  28. No Profile? • What would have happened if the perpetrators of these shootings had been mainly women, or black males instead?

  29. School shootings: A Surrogate Debate • Family changes, women in the workforce • Bad parenting • Depression/mental illness • Goth subculture • Gun control • Importance of religion, prayer, faith • Disrespectful youth/rebelliousness – absence of traditional values

  30. School shootings: A Surrogate Debate • Media, music, videogames, the internet • … • Maybe its time to bring gender into the picture!

  31. More AnswersYes: Michael Kimmel“Snips and Snails… and Violent Urges” • Gender as single most obvious and intractable difference in violence in the US • We often talk about school shootings as “youth” and “teen” violence • But the majority of these teens are boys • Men and boys are responsible for 95% of violent crimes in the US • From early age boys learn that violence is an acceptable and admirable way of conflict resolution

  32. Yes: Michael Kimmel“Snips and Snails… and Violent Urges” • Most school shooters subject to teasing, bashing and questioning of their masculinity • Some turn inward: depression, drug-abuse, isolation, suicide • Some turn outward: rage, violence • Violence not in male brain or testosterone: boys learn it • Media, sports, culture that glorifies heroic and redemptive violence • Fathers; 50% own guns • We need to look at how ideals of manhood became so entangled with violence • School shooters are “real boys” and want to prove it

  33. No: Alvin Poussaint • Major role of depression • Individuals trying to cope with internal anger and rage • Not everyone turns into violence, so those at risk should be referred to psychological counseling • Students should feel comfortable and encouraged to tell teachers about peers carrying weapons and making violent threats • Parents should see alienation, anger, making threats and getting into fights as warning signs • As a neighbour/observer, you should report parents who neglect or abuse their children to social service agencies

  34. No: Alvin Poussaint • Offer alternative outlets to channel aggression • Sports, communications with family and friends, anger management • Youth tends to normalize the violence they see in the media, videogames • They don’t see that death is real • Institute programs that combat prejudice and promote tolerance • Schools should pay more attention to warning signs and the need for more moral education

More Related