1 / 23

Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts

a convective case in summer 2003 seen from NOAA satellites. Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts. HiRLAM mini workshop on clouds and convection. Christoph Zingerle. Tartu, 24. – 26. Jan. 2005. Outline. - Verification: Alignments for Satellite Data.

nelms
Télécharger la présentation

Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. a convective case in summer 2003 seen from NOAA satellites Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts HiRLAM mini workshop on clouds and convection Christoph Zingerle Tartu, 24. – 26. Jan. 2005

  2. Outline - Verification: Alignments for Satellite Data - Satellite Data - Case studies - Outlook / Future HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005

  3. Verification Comparing Observations to Forecast - Observation and forecast are on different scale / location - Point measurements – volumes / fields - Problems verifying fields of meteorological data e.g. rain, clouds, radar reflectivity HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005

  4. Verification HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005

  5. temperature humidity cloud fraction cloud liquid water cloud ice water total cloud water surface data (p, T, rH) - Simulates clear/cloudy multilevel infrared and microwave radiances RTTOV-8 - Consistent random-overlap scheme for clouds in different levels - Multiphase cloud field: water / ice / mixed HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Verification

  6. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Satellite Data

  7. NOAAAVHRR satellite image - Re-sampling needed - Preprocessed AVHRR image (calibrated and navigated) pixel center in the grid-box corresponding to the HIRLAM grid pixel assigned to this grid-box HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Satellite Data - Assumptions: HIRLAM grid value represents average over all the values in box Neighbouring pixels tend to have similar properties

  8. full resolution, 30.4.2004 (10.8µ) after re-sampling, 30.4.2004 (10.8µ) HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005

  9. 15. – 17. July 2005 MODEL: SATELLITE DATA: - Forecasts re-run at ECMWF in May 2004 with reference HiRLAM of last summer. - Smalldomain covering little more than Scandinavia - All NOAA satellite observations of that periode - Irregular distribution (time and space) of the satellite overpasses HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case

  10. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case

  11. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case all observations convection observed surface / clear sky

  12. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case

  13. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case morning

  14. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case

  15. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case afternoon

  16. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case afternoon

  17. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case night

  18. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005

  19. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Convective Case afernoon 2 (+34h)

  20. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Evolution histogram

  21. HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Evolution histogram

  22. Satellite Data: - RTM’s are a very useful tool also in verification - Up / Dowonscaling methods have to be tested more extensively (true observation?) - Continuous observations are needed - Convective clouds in model general to warm – convection not strong enough? - Higher surface temperatures observed than forecasted - Advected clouds have smaller differences - Error decompostion needed! (postion, area, intensity) HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Conclusions

  23. - This case: more forecasts – more details (lead time) - Continuous observations – METEOSAT 7/8 - Adaption of error decompostion software - Satellite / SYNOP comparison HiRLAM mini workshop, Tartu 24. – 26. Jan. 2005 Future

More Related