1 / 37

Syntax IV

Syntax IV. March 29, 2012. Weekday Update. Syntax homework will be posted after class today …due on Tuesday (April 3rd) Next week, we will start working on the analysis of meaning: Pragmatics + Semantics Also note that the final exam for this course has been scheduled:

nhung
Télécharger la présentation

Syntax IV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Syntax IV March 29, 2012

  2. Weekday Update • Syntax homework will be posted after class today • …due on Tuesday (April 3rd) • Next week, we will start working on the analysis of meaning: • Pragmatics + Semantics • Also note that the final exam for this course has been scheduled: • Thursday, April 19th, 12-2 pm • Murray Fraser Hall (MFH) 160

  3. In Our Last Episode IP NP I’ the police I VP [+past] V’ PP V NP P’ shot Det N’ P NP the N with rifles terrorists In this tree, the police are using the rifles to shoot the terrorists. The PP is a modifier of the VP here, not a complement. = it’s not required by the verb.

  4. Quick Write Greatest Hits

  5. Quick Write Greatest Hits

  6. More Modifiers • From the last Quick Write: • IP • NP I’ • She I VP • [-past] V’ AdvP • V CP Deg Adv’ • wants IP really Adv • I VP badly • to V NP • play tennis In this interpretation, “really badly” modifies “wants”. (I’m glossing over some of the structure here)

  7. More Modifiers IP NP I’ She I VP [-past] V’ V CP wants IP I VP to V NP AdvP play tennis really badly In this interpretation, “really badly” modifies “play”. (I’m glossing over some of the structure here)

  8. An Earlier Quick Write

  9. An Earlier Quick Write • Note the following combination: • Jack and Jill ran the bill up. • *Jack and Jill ran the hill up. • And also this combination: • Up the hill ran Jack and Jill. • *Up the bill ran Jack and Jill.

  10. An Earlier Quick Write

  11. An Earlier Quick Write • It’s okay to move a PP to the front of the sentence: • Up the hill ran Jack and Jill. • But you can’t move just the P to the end of the sentence: • *Jack and Jill ran the hill up. • Note that “up” behaves differently in the other sentences: • *Up the bill ran Jack and Jill. • Jack and Jill ran the bill up. • In the “bill” sentences, “up” is not a preposition, it’s a particle. • …and it’s okay to end a sentence with a particle.

  12. Language Universals • All languages have phrases with heads and complements. • All languages have nouns and verbs. • All languages can exhibit recursion. • Linguists hypothesize: • All of this information is part of Universal Grammar (UG) • Children do not need to learn these aspects of grammar from their environment. • But: languages can differ syntactically within these universal limits.

  13. Language Choices • One syntactic feature which differs between languages: • head-first vs. head-final • English is a head-first language • = the head of the phrase precedes any complements. • For example: • V’  V (NP) (PP) • N’  N (PP) • A’  A (PP) • P’  P (NP) • In general: X’  X (YP)

  14. Language Choices • Other languages are head-final • Ex: Japanese • The head of the phrase in Japanese always follows its complements: • In general: X’  (YP) X • Example: P’  NP P • niwa-de • “garden in” = “in the garden” • N P • By the way: in languages like these, “prepositions” are called “post-positions”

  15. Syntactic Typology • Sentences in head-final languages usually follow the pattern: subject - object - verb (SOV) • Japanese examples: • Taro-ga inu-o mitsuketa • Taro-subject marker dog-object marker found • “Taro found a dog.” • Inu-ga niwa-de asonde iru • dog-subject marker garden-in playing is • “The dog is playing in the garden.”

  16. Syntactic Typology • There are six possible orders for subject, verb, and object in a sentence. • All six orders have been attested in at least one of the world’s languages. • 44% of the world’s languages are SOV languages. • Japanese, Korean, Turkish • 35% of the world’s languages are SVO languages. • English, French, Chinese • 19% of the world’s languages are VSO languages. • Irish, Arabic, Welsh

  17. Syntactic Typologies • 2% of the world’s languages are VOS languages. • Aramaic, Hawaiian, Tagalog, Maori • OSV languages are very rare • Xavante, Jamamadi (spoken in Brazil) • OVS languages are the rarest of all • Guarijio (northwest Mexico), Hixkaryana (also Brazil) • Another OVS language: Klingon • Some languages have free word order • Dyirbal (spoken in Australia) (by about five people)

  18. Scrambling! • Dyirbal is a “scrambling” language • = free word-order, syntactically • Case-marking of nouns makes this possible… • “The man hit the woman.” • bangul jara-ngu balan djugumbil balgan • ERG1 man-ERG OBJ2 woman hit (SOV) • balan djugumbil bangul jara-ngu balgan • OBJ2 woman ERG1 man-ERG hit (OSV) • “The dingo took her baby.” • bangun ganibarra-gu budin bangun gudjarra • ERG2 dingo-ERG take GEN2 baby (SVO)

  19. Yodish • What sort of language does Yoda speak? • Some examples are (relatively) straightforward: • My home this is. • To Obi-Wan you listen. • In these sentences, the complement of the verb moves to the front of the sentence. • (= OSV) • The others are slightly different: • Help you I can. • Take you to him I will. • In these two, Yoda moves the whole VP to the front.

  20. Wait…things move? • Movement rules can explain syntactic patterns in language that phrase structure rules alone cannot account for. • For instance: some sentences are systematically related to other sentences. • Declarative Interrogative • The boy is sleeping. Is the boy sleeping? • The boy has slept. Has the boy slept? • The boy can sleep. Can the boy sleep? • The boy will sleep. Will the boy sleep? • The boy did sleep. Did the boy sleep? • What’s the pattern?

  21. What’s the Pattern? • Declarative sentences like “The boy is sleeping” can be generated with the usual syntactic rules. • IP • NP I’ • Det N’ I VP • the N is V’ • boy V • sleeping • We get the interrogative sentence “Is the boy sleeping?” by inverting the order of the subject and the auxiliary.

  22. Inversion CP C’ C IP NP I’ Det N’ I VP the N is V’ boy V sleeping

  23. Inversion CP C’ C IP NP I’ Det N’ I VP the N is V’ boy V sleeping • Note: the auxiliary verb moves from one head slot to another. • Rule: move the I head to the C node. • This “inversion” rule creates a yes/no question.

  24. Inversion Results CP C’ C IP is NP I’ [+Q] Det N’ I VP the N t V’ boy V sleeping The movement leaves a “trace” (t) behind in the I slot. • The C slot has to be marked with a [+Q] (for “question”) to make this movement happen. • …like the I slot being marked for tense.

  25. Transformations • The syntactic rules that we’ve seen so far are phrase structure rules: • NP  Det N’ • P’  P NP • A rule that generates one kind of sentence from another sentence is called a transformational rule. • “Transformations” give us the questions for “free”… • so long as our phrase structure rules generate the corresponding declarative sentences.

  26. A More Complex Case • Does our transformational rule work for this sentence? • The chicken crossed the road. • Maybe. • To create this question: “Did the chicken cross the road?” • …it is first necessary to add the auxiliary verb “do”. • = “Do” insertion • The chicken crossed the road.  • The chicken did cross the road.  • Did the chicken cross the road? • In English, it is not possible to invert non-auxiliary verbs.

  27. Split-Levels • Syntactic phrase structure rules (“Merge”) create the Deep Structure of a sentence. • Transformation rules (“Move”) change the Deep Structure into the Surface Structure that we see in interrogative sentences. • Phonology analogy: • Underlying representation = Deep Structure • Surface representation = Surface Structure • In both cases, this is called a derivation. • and multiple rules can apply before the final product appears on the surface.

  28. A More Complex Case • Does our transformational rule work for this sentence? • Bob said that the chicken crossed the road. • Maybe. • There are actually two options: • Did Bob say that the chicken crossed the road? • *Did Bob said that the chicken cross the road? • Yes/No questions can only be formed from the main (highest level) sentence. • They cannot be formed from an embedded sentence. • The Complementizer (“that”) fills the C slot and prevents an embedded auxiliary from moving up.

  29. Wh Questions • Here’s another relationship between sentences: • Declarative Interrogative • Bart kicked the ball. • What did Bart kick? • Lisa put the leash on the table. • Where did Lisa put the leash? • Marge sent a card to Selma. • Who did Marge send a card to? • These questions are known as “Wh-Questions” • why, who, where, when, what, how

  30. Wh Question Rules • The formation of these questions is considerably more complex. • Step 1: Wh-substitution • Substitute impersonal NPs with “what” • Substitute personal NPs with “who” • Substitute location PPs with “where” • etc. • Examples: • Bart kicked the ball.  Bart kicked what? • Lisa put the leash on the table.  • Lisa put the leash where?

  31. Wh Movement Rules • Step 2: Move (or insert) the auxiliary verb to the beginning of the sentence. • Bart kicked what?  Did Bart kick what? • Lisa put the leash where?  • Did Lisa put the leash where? • Step 3: Move the Wh word to the beginning of the sentence. • Did Bart kick what?  What did Bart kick? • Did Lisa put the leash where?  • Where did Lisa put the leash?

  32. Wh-Movement CP (Spec) C’ C IP NP I’ Bart I VP did V’ V NP kick what

  33. Wh-Movement CP (Spec) C’ C IP did NP I’ Bart I VP t V’ V NP kick what

  34. Wh-Movement The Wh- particle moves from a non-head position to another non-head position. (so it doesn’t cross paths with move #1) CP NP C’ What C IP did NP I’ Bart I VP t V’ V NP kick t

  35. Questions around the World • In other languages, questions can be formed by moving any verb (not just an auxiliary) to the front of the sentence. • Dutch: • Femke leest veel boeken. • “Femke reads many books.” • Q: Leest Femke veel boeken? • reads Femke many books • “Does Femke read many books?”

  36. Wh non-movement • Some languages form Wh questions without moving anything. • Japanese: • Taro-ga nani-o mitsuketa-no? • Taro-subject what found-question marker • “What did Taro find?” • Swahili: • Ulipatia nani kitabu • you gave who a book • “Who did you give a book?”

  37. Principles and Parameters • Language has universal features = principles • Nouns, verbs, etc. • Phrases with heads and complements. • Individual languages have options = parameters • Head-first or head-last? • Wh-movement or no Wh-movement? • Kids acquiring language get the universal principles for free; • it’s part of Universal Grammar (UG) • …but they have to figure out the “parameters” from what they hear in the world around them, as they grow up.

More Related