1 / 19

Does My Research Require Ethical Review?

Does My Research Require Ethical Review?. John Russell Chair, Langara College Research Ethics Board Chair, Langara Department of Philosophy Talk for Langara PD Days April 24, 2013 (Revised May 14, 2014). What you should learn today.

nili
Télécharger la présentation

Does My Research Require Ethical Review?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Does My Research Require Ethical Review? John Russell Chair, Langara College Research Ethics Board Chair, Langara Department of Philosophy Talk for Langara PD Days April 24, 2013 (Revised May 14, 2014)

  2. What you should learn today • When research involving humans requires review by the Langara Research Ethics Board • Which of two Langara REB review processes may applicable, either by a) the full Langara REB (for research not done solely for pedagogical purposes), or b) by the Langara REB chair or delegated REB member (for research conducted by students solely for pedagogical purposes, i.e., “course-based research” involving humans)

  3. Meet the Langara REB!

  4. Establishment of Langara REB • July 2013 pursuant to MOU with the federal Tri-Council (SSHRC, NSERC, and CIHR) • Members appointed by the Langara President to two-year renewable terms. • Operates under the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans(2010)(TCPS2)

  5. Langara REB Mandate • Reviews the ethical acceptability of all research involving collection of data from living humans conducted within Langara's“jurisdiction or under its auspices regardless of where the research is conducted.” (See TCPS2, Article 6.1) • Applies to all Langara faculty, staff, and students • Operates "independently" in its decision-making and is "free of inappropriate influence" (TCPS2, p. 62) • Includes responsibility for ethics review of “course-based research” involving humans

  6. What Is Research involving Humans? Research involving: (a) [data collection from] living human participants; (b) human biological materials, as well as human embryos, fetuses, fetal tissue, reproductive materials and stem cells. This applies to materials derived from living and deceased individuals. “Research” = “an undertaking intended to extend knowledge through a disciplined inquiry or systematic investigation.” (TCPS2, p. 15, added text in parentheses)

  7. Exceptions 1-5 Research and activities not requiring REB review: 1. Research that relies exclusively on publicly available information, if it a) is legally accessible, and b) is publicly accessible and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. (TCPS2, Article 2.2) Examples: Public archives, court decisions, media reports, gathering data on/from public "blogs," etc.

  8. 2. Research involving observations of people in public places, if - no intervention or direct interaction by researcher - no reasonable expectation of privacy - data dissemination does not allow identification of specific individuals (TCPS2, Article 2.3) Examples: acts or behaviour in a public natural environment.

  9. 3. Research that relies exclusively on secondary use of “anonymous” information or biological materials (Article 2.4) “anonymous” = data/materials never had personal identifiers associated with them (TCPS2, p. 57) Examples: questionnaires completed anonymously But, research requires REB review if anonymous data can be used or linked to permit identification

  10. 4. Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Studies (TCPS2, Article 2.5) QA/QI = Studies assessing the performance of an institution or its employees or students Examples: course and program evaluations, staff performance reviews

  11. 5. Creative practice activities (TCPS2, Article 2.6) “Creative practice activities” = process by which an artist makes or interprets art; study of how a work of art is created. Examples: Portrait painting, analyses of an artist’s creative process, etc.

  12. If in doubt about whether research/activity requires REB review, contact the Langara REB chair: John Russell jrussell@langara.bc.ca Loc. 5453

  13. Langara REB Review Process for Research Not Solely for Pedagogical Purposes • Complete Request for Ethics Approval Form • Provide two signed copies to Office of the Deans, Langara REB chair or administrator at least 14 days before scheduled meeting. • The chair appoints a primary reviewer to present the Request for Ethics Approval. • The Langara REB deliberates and decides to i) Approve, ii) Approve subject to satisfactory responses to provisos, iii) Defer, or iv) Reject. • An appeal process exists if disagreement about an Langara REB decision cannot be resolved. • There is a process for amendments and annual renewals. • The Langara REB’s administrative assistant is Ramon Rodrigo (rrodrigo@langara.bc.ca,604-323-5933). • See Langara Policy B5007 Ethical Conduct for Research involving Humans

  14. Other Aspects of Review Process • Langara REB members keep knowledge of and deliberations about applications confidential; declare conflicts of interest • Ethical implications of research methodology discussed where ethically relevant (bad science is often unethical) • A “proportionate approach” to ethics review is taken • Researchers are invited to attend and present their studies if they wish, but cannot remain during deliberations

  15. Issues for Discussion • Langara REB review is not strictly a scientific peer review process, but at a small institution is often the only opportunity for peer review. • Most studies are “minimal risk” and could, in theory, be handled by “delegated review.” • Others?

  16. REB Review of Course-Based Research • Course-based research involving collecting data from living humans will be eligible for review by the REB chair or delegated REB member, if the research is • Conducted solely for pedagogical purposes • “minimal risk” (as follows): Research in which the probability and magnitude of possible harms implied by participation in the research is no greater than those encountered by participants in the aspects of their everyday life that relate to the research.( TCPS2, Glossary) • Research must not expose students to more than minimal risk • Students collecting data from living humans as part of an instructor’s or another researcher’s study is not “course-based research” and requires full REB review

  17. Process • Instructors submit applications for students to conduct research involving data collection from living humans for each of the instructor’s courses (not classes) that require or permit students to undertake such research • Complete the Application Form for Course-Based Research and submit to Langara REB chair, John Russell, or REB administrative assistant Ramon Rodrigo • Deadlines are August 15, November 15, March 15 for the following terms • The instructor’s research component (including research ethics training and oversight) is approved for indefinitely for each course • But, any changes to the nature of the research involving humans or to ethics training or to ethics oversight must be submitted to the Langara REB chair and approved before changes are implemented

  18. More Information • See Information on the ethical review process for course-based research for more details

More Related