1 / 13

Internet Registry allocation and assignment

Internet Registry allocation and assignment. Policies. Overview of RIR Policies. Definitions Background Objectives Environment Allocation & Assignment Policies Summary. Definition: Allocation and Assignment. Allocation

Télécharger la présentation

Internet Registry allocation and assignment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internet Registry allocation and assignment Policies

  2. Overview of RIR Policies • Definitions • Background • Objectives • Environment • Allocation & Assignment Policies • Summary

  3. Definition: Allocation and Assignment • Allocation • A block of address space held by an IR for subsequent allocation or assignment • Not yet used to address any networks • Assignment • A block of address space used to address an operational network • May be provided to LIR customers, or used for an LIR’s infrastructure (‘self-assignment’)

  4. Definition: Allocation and Assignment RIR LIR Allocates IP addresses Assigns IP addresses LIR Customer

  5. Definition: PI and PA • Provider Independent (Portable) • Customer holds addresses independent from ISP • Customer keeps addresses when changing ISP • Bad for size of routing tables • Bad for QOS: routes may be filtered, flap-dampened • Provider Aggregatable (Non-portable) • Customer uses ISP’s address space • Customer must renumber if changing ISP • Only way to effectively scale the Internet

  6. But they cannot be relied on forever Projected routing table growth without CIDR Moore’s Law and CIDR made it work for a while DeploymentPeriod of CIDR RIR Policies - Background • Growth of Global Routing Table • Unaggregated Internet would exceed 200,000 routes! http://www.telstra.net/ops/bgptable.html

  7. May-00 <16 16 Mar-00 17 18 Jan-00 19 20 21 Nov-99 22 23 Sep-99 24 >24 Jul-99 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 Routing Table Prefix Distribution

  8. RIR Policies - Objectives • Ensuring efficient use and conservation of resources • Through careful allocation and assignment policies • Limiting growth of routable prefixes • Through provider-based addressing • Fairness and consistency of procedures • Through neutrality and expertise of registry

  9. RIR Allocation Policies • IP addresses not freehold property • Internet resources are public resources • ‘Ownership’ is contrary to management goals • Need to avoid the mistakes of the past • Assignments & allocations on lease basis • Routability not guaranteed • ISPs determine routability • Unpredictable growth rates • IPv4 deployment levels unanticipated • Routing table growth still poses a threat

  10. RIR Allocation Policies • Varying levels of expertise • Growing technical challenge • Staff turnover throughout industry • Flexible policies to accommodate differences • Training programme to support LIRs • Confidentiality & security • RIR to observe and protect trust relationship • Non-disclosure agreement signed by staff

  11. RIR Allocation Policies • Minimum practical allocation /20 • ‘Slow Start’ policy for new LIRs • Allocations as PA address space • Provider responsible for aggregation • Customer assignments must be non-portable • Allocations based on demonstrated need • Detailed documentation required • All address space held to be declared • Stockpiling not permitted

  12. RIR Allocation Policies • Implement ‘Best current practice’ • Will change over time as technology changes • Static assignments discouraged • dial up • virtual hosts (ip based web hosting, should be name based) • Address conservation considered • implement ‘ip unnumbered’ • use private address space (rfc1918) • consider use of Network Address Translation (NAT)

  13. Questions?

More Related