1 / 23

DEBATE

DEBATE. Debate sequencing. OPENING Affirmative Person 1 Negative Person 1 SPEECH (Mostly factual/teaching info) Affirmative Person 2 Negative Person 1 SPEECH (Some factual + emotional) Affirmative Person 1 Negative Person 2 CLOSING Affirmative Person 2 Negative Person 2

noek
Télécharger la présentation

DEBATE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DEBATE

  2. Debate sequencing • OPENING • Affirmative Person 1 • Negative Person 1 • SPEECH (Mostly factual/teaching info) • Affirmative Person 2 • Negative Person 1 • SPEECH (Some factual + emotional) • Affirmative Person 1 • Negative Person 2 • CLOSING • Affirmative Person 2 • Negative Person 2 • REFUTATION (Teams can address each other) • AUDIENCE QUESTIONS

  3. Topics • We will pick topics on Wednesday, 2/22 • Round 1: Random draw of names • Pick your debate topic • Pick affirmative or negative • Then line-up to choose additional topics

  4. Order of Debates • We will set debate schedule (order of debates) on Thursday, 2/23. • I will choose first debate • We will then draw numbers • Watch for back-to-back conflicts • Try to rotate tough/technical topics with silly/fun topics. • For each day of debate, the next topic PLUS the NEXT TWO topics should be prepared to present.

  5. Research • Topics chosen & order set by 2/23, so • BEGIN YOUR RESEARCH! • Non-verbal Communication 2/24-2/28 • We may have Library/Lab time 2/24-2/28??? • I will be gone 2/29-3/2, debate video during class. • Prep time Mon 3/5-Wed 3/7 • Debates begin Thursday, 3/8 • NOBODY MAY LEAVE CLASS OR RESEARCH DURING CLASS ONCE DEBATES START

  6. Assignments • Debate 1 250 pts • Debate 2 250 pts • Debate 3 & up extra credit worth half • Two highest scores will count as Deb 1 & 2 • Questions 100 pts • Questions worth 0-5 pts • Judging 100 pts • Up to 20 pts per judging

  7. Scoring • Citing Sources • Vocal Tones • Delivery style • Eye contact, posture, etc • Content • Appropriate Visuals

  8. Definitions • Negotiation: a cooperative relationship in which both sides want to reach an agreement. • Debate: a more formal way of solving problems; an important method of solving problems in a democracy; from Latin word meaning “to battle”

  9. Why Negotiate? • Best friend wants to borrow money from you, but amount is more than you can afford; friend gets angry. • Father insists you wash the car every Saturday, but older brother has no chores. • Curfew is an hour earlier than any of your friends.

  10. Techniques of Negotiation • Be Positive • Avoid negative words (from How to Say It at Work, list of 50 words to avoid on pg. 458) • Use Three-Part Messages • When you (x), I feel (x) because (x) • “Stop Talking so I can get a word in edgewise” VS. • “When you don’t do your homework, I feel disappointed because you don’t learn what you need to know.” • Be Prepared • Do the research; know the facts before opening your mouth • Talking “from the seat of your pants” or “off the top of your head” rarely impresses anyone • Have alternatives in mind • Know as much as possible about the position of the other party. • Tell the Truth • Your reputation is built on your integrity (you are true to yourself). • You should never sacrifice your values or standards to achieve your negotiation goals.

  11. Advantages of Debate • Career • Moving to a position of higher responsibility often depends on your ability to persuade people. • Managers and co-workers will challenge your opinions and you’ll have to think quickly and improvise rather than rely solely on prepared remarks. • Helping Others • Learn to narrow issues so they can be examined and analyzed one at a time. • Learn how to present logical, well-supported arguments and how to find and oint out errors in other arguments. • As a Voter • Become a more effective evaluator of arguments, more analytical listener • As a Citizen • Feeling comfortable standing up at a school board or city council meeting to offer solutions to problems.

  12. Debate Terminology • Proposition • Statement of the point to be debated; a fact, belief, or a recommendation to do something. • Very careful of wording as each word can have a major influence • Resolution • Formally statement of opinion introducing the proposition • Affirmative • Yes, the statement is true • Negative • No, the statement is false • Status Quo • The way things are now • Opposite is “Change” • Burden of Proof • In formal debate, BoP is on the debater arguing the affirmative, must prove there is a problem with the status quo

  13. Debate Terminology • Argument • A reason for favoring your side of the proposition. • The facts that support the reason • Evidence • Information that helps you prove something • Facts, statements, reports, quotes, etc. • Refute • To show that something is wrong or false • Attacking your opponent’s argument • Rebuttal • Speech that contradicts an earlier statement • Countering your opponent’s attacks on your arguments so you can rebuild your argument. • Example on page. 472

  14. Strategy pg. 474 • Work Hard • Anticipate • Build a Sound Case • Listen • Take Notes • Speak Clearly & Logically

  15. Test Your Evidence • Is your support recent? • Is there corroborative support? • Are the sources unbiased?

  16. ReasoningSpecific to Generalization • Were enough specific instances examined? • Larger the group covered by your conclusion, the greater the number of specific instances you should examine • Were the specific instances examined representative of the entire group? • To draw conclusions about the entire group, examine specific instances from subgroups • Were there any significant exceptions? • Hiding S.E. is dishonest and will cause audience to discredit your p.o.v. since they probably know the exception

  17. Analogies • Provide a change of pace and build a sense of suspense • Can underline a basic truth with a seemingly lighthearted moment • Using an example from daily life puts every member of the audience directly into the story as well as humanizing yourself.

  18. Analogies • Most effective when: • Cases used are alike in essential respects • Cases used have differences which do not make a significant difference • Similarities in the cases are stressed • Importance of differences are minimized • Differences are confronted squarely

  19. ReasoningCause to Effect.or.Effect to Cause • Example: • X results from Y • And since X is undesirable • Y should be eliminated • OR • X results from Y • And since X is desirable • Y should be encouraged

  20. Test Reasoning from Causes and Effects Before Using • Might other causes be producing the observed effect? • If two things occur together – what is the cause and what is the effect? • Is the evidence causal or merely a time sequence?

  21. Recognizing Faulty Reasoning • Emotionalism • Speakers appeal to your feelings rather than to your intellect • Unsupported Assertions • Speakers may state a conclusion without offering proof • Generalizing from insufficient evidence • A general conclusion must be founded on a sufficient number of typical instances • Begging the Question • Speakers state as a conclusion that which needs to be proven

  22. Recognizing Faulty Reasoning • Personal Attacks • Speakers attack opponents instead of responding to the arguments • Scapegoats • Speakers hold an individual or group responsible for our troubles • Bandwagon • Speakers appeal to the tendency to “go along with the crow” or “what is popular.” • Diversion or “the red herring device” • Speakers do not respond to a charge, they launch an attack of their own by leading our attention to something different.

  23. Recognizing Faulty Reasoning • Straw Man • Speaker restates only part of the opponents case and dismantles that part, thereby appearing to dismantle the whole case • Falsehoods • Speakers use big lies, half-truths, distortions, and the suppression of essential information to deceive listeners. • Speaker’s personality may affect your willingness or reluctance to accept what is said.

More Related