370 likes | 420 Vues
Individual Professional Development Plan. Fall School Improvement Conference December 2, 2009. Agenda. Welcome Setting the Michigan Context Short Video Overview of IPDP Online Tool and Process IPDP and Phases Closing. Setting the Michigan Context. Section 1526: Mentor
E N D
Individual Professional Development Plan Fall School Improvement Conference December 2, 2009
Agenda • Welcome • Setting the Michigan Context • Short Video • Overview of IPDP Online Tool and Process • IPDP and Phases • Closing
Setting the Michigan Context Section 1526: • Mentor • Individual Professional Development Plan • 15 days of PD across first 3 years
Setting the Michigan Context • Michigan Standards for Ensuring Excellent Educators • Vision and Standards for Professional Development • Professional Learning Strategic Plan
IPDP Aligns with: • School Improvement Plan • Professional Standards for Michigan Teachers • Content Expectations • Registry of Educational Personnel
IPDP Focus • Data-based Decisions • Student Achievement • Attention to Content AND Pedagogy • Evidence of Improvement • Reflective Improvement • Implementation of Educational Technology (On-line Tool)
How Did We Get Here? • Input of Stakeholder Groups • Support of Great Lakes East • Reactions of Focus Groups
Identifying Student and Professional Needs In groups… • Discuss what Mr. Kimball’s students might need and what data sources might be helpful. • Brainstorm what Mr. Kimball’s professional needs might be. • Name other content needs may connect to the GLCEs. • Neighbor Nudge.
Developing Professional Goals In groups… • Discuss some potential goals and measurable objectives for Mr. Kimball that align with his student and professional learning needs. • Relate content goals to specific GLCEs in your content area. • Share with the group.
IPDP and Phases • Foundations in Mentoring. New Teacher Center @ University of California, Santa Cruz
Collecting Evidence In groups… • Discuss how Mr. Kimball might collect data to assess his learning AND his students’ learning in relation to his professional development activities and goals. • Share with the group.
Completing Annual Reflection • How well did I meet my goal(s) and measurable objective(s)? What evidence do I have? Which professional learning activities most helped me move toward my goal(s)? How? • How well did I meet my goal(s) and measurable objective(s)? What evidence do I have? Which professional learning activities most helped me move toward my goal(s)? How? • What changes did I make to the plan throughout the year and why? • What went right? What went wrong? • What would I do differently next time? • Did my plan work as expected? Why or why not? • What does my work on this plan contribute (or not) to my plan for next year? • Based on this experience, what goal(s) might I consider for next year?
Where Are We Now? • Regional Field Test Sites • Online tool used by novice teachers and mentors • Field Test through June • Feedback via survey and interviews • Improved based on feedback • Roll out Fall 2010
Contact Information • Karen Hairston • hairstonk@michigan.gov • Donna Hamilton • hamiltond3@michigan.gov • 517.241.4546 • Bonnie Rockafellow • rockafellowb@michigan.gov • 517.373.7861