1 / 15

Computer Parsed Oral Speech Recognition and Assessment October 2010

Computer Parsed Oral Speech Recognition and Assessment October 2010. The Speaking Craze. Rapport Headstart2 AFPAK Hands Language Enabled Special Operations Foreign Area Officers/Regional Area Specialists/Regional Area Officers Interrogators Civil Affairs. The Assessment Challenge.

nola-harrison
Télécharger la présentation

Computer Parsed Oral Speech Recognition and Assessment October 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Computer Parsed Oral Speech Recognition and AssessmentOctober 2010

  2. The Speaking Craze • Rapport • Headstart2 • AFPAK Hands • Language Enabled • Special Operations • Foreign Area Officers/Regional Area Specialists/Regional Area Officers • Interrogators • Civil Affairs

  3. The Assessment Challenge • Desire to provide incentives • Level 0+/1 Listening/Reading/Speaking • DLPT/ Very Low Range for Listening and Reading • But speaking and participatory listening are the desired skills • How to assess?

  4. The Demand • About 9,000 per year • Projected demand: 20,000 to 40,000 • Gold standard:Face to Face, 2-rater/3rd rater • Double rater • Single rater • OPIc /ACTFL • Versant/Ordinate

  5. Everyone wants a speaking test, but the numbers of testers, time, modality, and dollars set limits Can the computer help?

  6. Machine Translation Evaluation and ASR at DLIFLC • Jibbigo • Phraselator • Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) Development • DLIFLC – MIT-LL (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratories) collaboration

  7. Machine Translation Devices • Jibbigo (iPhone-based) • 2W, S2S – Two-Way, Speech-to-Speech, Free Speech • + Easy to use; works well with basic vocabulary; created for humanitarian missions • - Longer phrases, sentences are not recognized well; military vocabulary hardly recognized; abbreviations and proper nouns (including names of persons and places) are not recognized and generally mistranslated

  8. Machine Translation Devices • Phraselator • 1W, S2S – One Way, Speech-to-Speech, Phrase-based • + Ruggedized body; 75-80% success with English automatic voice recognition of onboard phrases • - Works only with a limited number of pre-recorded phrases: about 2,500 phrases per language; output only in target language (no input); screen hard to read; limited memory and functions as it is based on a PDA, Windows CE Operating System

  9. Machine Translation Devices • 2W, S2S - IBM MASTOR

  10. Machine Translation Devices 1W, T2S - VCOM3D

  11. Machine Translation Devices

  12. Hanscom AFB / MIT-Lincoln Lab - ASR • Development of an Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) System for Arabic learners • Concept of Implementation • First version - ASR beta - to operate in 6 months • Local programmer will be trained by MIT-LL to support, operate, develop, and maintain DLIFLC ASR system • DLIFLC local data collection will support development and control costs • Cost of DLIFLC ASR programmer min. 85-95K /year • Cost of licensing for each language as projected by a contractor, for example, was $1.2m to develop with 75% licensing fees of initial costs per year thereafter

  13. Hanscom AFB / MIT-Lincoln Lab - ASR • Development of an Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) System for Arabic learners • Operation • System will recognize targeted words spoken by students • System will give real-time feedback on pronunciation errors • System will score level of correctness (beta precursor to automated OPI testing) • System will enable and enhance existing DLIFLC language learning products and curriculum • System can be expanded to support additional languages

  14. ALELO Tactical Dari Demonstration (No Endorsement Intended or Implied)

  15. Summary • Technologies have potential • Self-teaching software should have a built-in assessment • Commercial and government products have some very good applications and potential • DLIFLC is exploring several options • Potential exists for low level assessment

More Related