1 / 76

Lecture 42: Review of active MOSFET circuits

Lecture 42: Review of active MOSFET circuits. Prof. J. S. Smith. Final Exam. Covers the course from the beginning Date/Time: SATURDAY, MAY 15, 2004 8-11A Location: BECHTEL auditorium One page (Two sides) of notes. Observed Behavior: I D - V DS.

Télécharger la présentation

Lecture 42: Review of active MOSFET circuits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 42: Review of active MOSFET circuits Prof. J. S. Smith

  2. Final Exam • Covers the course from the beginning • Date/Time: SATURDAY, MAY 15, 2004 8-11A • Location: BECHTEL auditorium • One page (Two sides) of notes University of California, Berkeley

  3. Observed Behavior: ID-VDS • For low values of drain voltage, the device is like a resistor • As the voltage is increases, the resistance behaves non-linearly and the rate of increase of current slows • Eventually the current stops growing and remains essentially constant (current source) non-linear resistor region “constant” current resistor region University of California, Berkeley

  4. Observed Behavior: ID-VDS non-linear resistor region “constant” current resistor region As the drain voltage increases, the E field across the oxide at the drain end is reduced, and so the charge is less, and the current no longer increases proportionally. As the gate-source voltage is increased, this happens at higher and higher drain voltages. The start of the saturation region is shaped like a parabola University of California, Berkeley

  5. Finding ID = f (VGS, VDS) • Approximate inversion charge QN(y): drain is higher than the source  less charge at drain end of channel University of California, Berkeley

  6. Inversion Charge at Source/Drain The charge under the gate along the gate, but we are going to make a simple approximation, that the average charge is the average of the charge near the source and drain University of California, Berkeley

  7. Average Inversion Charge Drain End Source End • Charge at drain end is lower since field is lower • Notice that this only works if the gate is inverted along its entire length • If there is an inversion along the entire gate, it works well because Q is proportional to V everywhere the gate is inverted University of California, Berkeley

  8. Drift Velocity and Drain Current “Long-channel” assumption: use mobility to find v And now the current is just charge per area, times velocity, times the width: Inverted Parabolas University of California, Berkeley

  9. Square-Law Characteristics Boundary: what is ID,SAT? TRIODE REGION SATURATION REGION University of California, Berkeley

  10. The Saturation Region When VDS > VGS – VTn, there isn’t any inversion charge at the drain … according to our simplistic model Why do curves flatten out? University of California, Berkeley

  11. Square-Law Current in Saturation Current stays at maximum (where VDS = VGS – VTn ) Measurement: ID increases slightly with increasing VDS model with linear “fudge factor” University of California, Berkeley

  12. A Simple Circuit: An MOS Amplifier Input signal Supply “Rail” Output signal University of California, Berkeley

  13. Small Signal Analysis • Step 1: Find DC operating point. Calculate (estimate) the DC voltages and currents (ignore small signals sources) • Substitute the small-signal model of the MOSFET/BJT/Diode and the small-signal models of the other circuit elements. • Solve for desired parameters (gain, input impedance, …) University of California, Berkeley

  14. Supply “Rail” A Simple Circuit: An MOS Amplifier Input signal Output signal University of California, Berkeley

  15. VGS,BIAS was found in Lecture 15 Small-Signal Analysis Step 1. Find DC Bias – ignore small-signal source IGS,Q University of California, Berkeley

  16. Small-Signal Modeling What are the small-signal models of the DC supplies? Shorts! University of California, Berkeley

  17. Small-Signal Models of Ideal Supplies Small-signal model: short open University of California, Berkeley

  18. Small-Signal Circuit for Amplifier University of California, Berkeley

  19. Low-Frequency Voltage Gain Consider first   0 case … capacitors are open-circuits Design Variable Transconductance Design Variables University of California, Berkeley

  20. Voltage Gain (Cont.) Substitute transconductance: Output resistance: typical value n= 0.05 V-1 Voltage gain: University of California, Berkeley

  21. Input and Output Waveforms Output small-signal voltage amplitude: 14 x 25 mV = 350 Input small-signal voltage amplitude: 25 mV University of California, Berkeley

  22. What Limits the Output Amplitude? 1. vOUT(t) reaches VSUP or 0… or 2. MOSFET leaves constant-current region and enters triode region University of California, Berkeley

  23. Maximum Output Amplitude vout(t)= -2.18 V cos(t)  vs(t) = 152 mV cos(t) How accurate is the small-signal (linear) model? Significant error in neglecting third term in expansion of iD= iD(vGS) University of California, Berkeley

  24. One-Port Models (EECS 40) • A terminal pair across which a voltage and associated current are defined Circuit Block University of California, Berkeley

  25. Small-Signal Two-Port Models • We assume that input port is linear and that the amplifier is unilateral: • Output depends on input but input is independent of output. • Output port : depends linearly on the current and voltage at the input and output ports • Unilateral assumption is good as long as “overlap” capacitance is small (MOS) University of California, Berkeley

  26. Two-Port Small-Signal Amplifiers Voltage Amplifier Current Amplifier University of California, Berkeley

  27. Two-Port Small-Signal Amplifiers Transconductance Amplifier Transresistance Amplifier University of California, Berkeley

  28. Common-Source Amplifier (again) How to isolate DC level? University of California, Berkeley

  29. DC Bias 5 V Neglect all AC signals 2.5 V Choose IBIAS, W/L University of California, Berkeley

  30. Load-Line Analysis to find Q Q University of California, Berkeley

  31. Small-Signal Analysis University of California, Berkeley

  32. Two-Port Parameters: Generic Transconductance Amp Find Rin, Rout, Gm University of California, Berkeley

  33. Two-Port CS Model Reattach source and load one-ports: University of California, Berkeley

  34. Maximize Gain of CS Amp • Increase the gm (more current) • Increase RD (free? Don’t need to dissipate extra power) • Limit: Must keep the device in saturation • For a fixed current, the load resistor can only be chosen so large • To have good swing we’d also like to avoid getting too close to saturation University of California, Berkeley

  35. Current Source Supply • Solution: Use a current source! • Current independent of voltage for ideal source University of California, Berkeley

  36. CS Amp with Current Source Supply University of California, Berkeley

  37. Load Line for DC Biasing Both the I-source and the transistor are idealized for DC bias analysis University of California, Berkeley

  38. Two-Port Parameters From current source supply University of California, Berkeley

  39. P-Channel CS Amplifier DC bias: VSG = VDD – VBIAS sets drain current –IDp = ISUP University of California, Berkeley

  40. University of California, Berkeley

  41. Common Gate Amplifier Notice that IOUT must equal -Is DC bias: Gain of transistor tends to hold this node at ss ground: low input impedance load for current input current gain=1 Impedance buffer University of California, Berkeley

  42. CG as a Current Amplifier: Find Ai University of California, Berkeley

  43. CG Input Resistance At input: Output voltage: University of California, Berkeley

  44. Approximations… • We have this messy result • But we don’t need that much precision. Let’s start approximating: University of California, Berkeley

  45. CG Output Resistance University of California, Berkeley

  46. CG Output Resistance Substituting vs= itRS The output resistance is (vt / it)|| roc University of California, Berkeley

  47. Approximating the CG Rout The exact result is complicated, so let’s try to make it simpler: Assuming the source resistance is less than ro, University of California, Berkeley

  48. CG Two-Port Model Function: a current buffer • Low Input Impedance • High Output Impedance University of California, Berkeley

  49. Common-Drain Amplifier In the common drain amp, the output is taken from a terminal of which the current is a sensitive function Weak IDS dependence University of California, Berkeley

  50. CD Voltage Gain Note vgs = vt – vout University of California, Berkeley

More Related