1 / 9

Single Event Upsets (SEUs) Particularly in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs)

Single Event Upsets (SEUs) Particularly in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). Shadab Ambat. Overview. Introduction SEU Effects Motivation SEUs in FPGAs SEUs in the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro SEU Mitigation Techniques Detection and Mitigation Tools. Introduction.

omer
Télécharger la présentation

Single Event Upsets (SEUs) Particularly in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Single Event Upsets (SEUs) Particularly in Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) Shadab Ambat

  2. Overview • Introduction • SEU Effects • Motivation • SEUs in FPGAs • SEUs in the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro • SEU Mitigation Techniques • Detection and Mitigation Tools Shadab Ambat

  3. Introduction • Single event upsets (SEUs) are radiation-induced errors in microelectronic circuits caused when charged particles (usually from the radiation belts or from cosmic rays) lose energy by ionizing the medium through which they pass, leaving behind a wake of electron-hole pairs. • In other words – they are changes in states or voltage levels caused when by high-energy particle striking sensitive nodes in a micro-electronic device • Typically observed in microprocessors, memory elements, FPGAs etc. • Normally occur in space or at high altitudes • Mainly caused by two types of radiation with the latter being the primary one • Alpha particle • High-energy neutrons Shadab Ambat

  4. SEU Effects • They are basically soft errors, and non-destructive. • However can in several cases lead to potentially destructive errors like • Single Event Latchup (SEL): High operating current can destroy device • Single Event Functional Interrupts (SEFI): Device goes into a halt or undefined state and must be reset to recover • Single Event Burnouts (SEB): These are conditions that cause device destruction due to a high current state in a power transistor device Shadab Ambat

  5. Motivation • To counter SEU effects, radiation hardened chips are used • Downsides to this are: • These chips are expensive • Consume more power • Can be as much as 10 times slower than their equivalent commercial counterparts • NASA researching on using commercial non-radiation hardened processors for several space applications instead • One technique to resolve problem of SEUs – use three times as many processors and vote on the result (triple modular redundancy). • Project is called Dependable Multiprocessor (DM), formerly known as Environmentally Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Computing (EAFTC) • This proposed solution will be flight-tested on the Space Technology 8 (ST-8) satellite part of NASA's New Millennium Program • ST-8 mission targeted to launch on 28 February 2009 Shadab Ambat

  6. SEUs in FPGAs • FPGAs consist of static memory elements and a configuration array • Configuration array used to program the FPGA and specify its functionality • SEUs might either: • Alter logic (bitflip) in a memory element like a latch or RAM cell • Or cause a static upset in the configuration memory • Latter case might lead to a functional error in the FPGA and could cause adverse effects in its functionality Shadab Ambat

  7. SEUs in the Xilinx Virtex-II Pro • Virtex-II Pro currently proposed for use in the DM module of the ST-8 • Complex System on a Chip (SoC) design • Main components include an IBM PowerPC, configuration memory and RAM blocks • A Test conducted by scientists from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center showed all the above to be affected by SEUs • Configuration memory and PowerPC had high susceptibility to radiation • Test conducted on 3 identical boards, each populated with a delidded Virtex-II Pro FPGA Device reprograms • No destructive SEL event observed to a Linear Energy Transfer of 53.9 MeV-cm2/mg and a fluency of 107 Ions/cm2 • SELs caused cyclical current ramping in device • 400,000+ configuration errors recorded during two short runs • Jumps in the PowerPC instruction set • PowerPC reset itself twice • Lost JTAG capability twice during SEL testing • Overall result to reestablish functionality – Reprogram: 70%, Software Reset: 28%, Power Cycle: 2% Shadab Ambat

  8. SEU Mitigation Techniques • Partial Reconfiguration • Readback current configuration • Do a bit by bit comparison (slower) or a CRC check (faster) • Re-configure affected bits • Scrubbing • Omit readback or detection • Reload entire bitstream at regular (scrubbing) intervals • TMR • Implement TMR on same chip. Triplicate all logic blocks on same chip • Use 3 chips to incorporate TMR Shadab Ambat

  9. Detection and Mitigation Tools • Xilinx TMRTool – XTMR • Automatically builds TMR methodology into Xilinx FPGA designs • Triplicates all inputs including clocks and throughput (combinational) logic • Inserts voters on all feedback paths resulting in state machines to remain synchronized. Removes need to reset to recover from SEU • Major difference from traditional TMR – voters themselves are triplicated • If SEU occurs in a voter domain it places output to high impedance • If SEU in voter itself, worst it does is disable the output of a domain that is behaving correctly. • ZeroSoft’s free online soft error detection tool • Requires the VHDL and VCD files • Gives a free online evaluation • Currently works only with Xilinx cell libraries Shadab Ambat

More Related