1 / 7

Readiness Reporting Update AUSA Conference

Readiness Reporting Update AUSA Conference. Purpose. The purpose of this briefing is to provide an update on the 2009 revision of AR 220-1. Units will begin reporting on a single METL in the USR effective 15 December 2009. What Readiness Reporting is and is not. AR 220-1 is :

ovidio
Télécharger la présentation

Readiness Reporting Update AUSA Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Readiness Reporting UpdateAUSA Conference

  2. Purpose The purpose of this briefing is to provide an update on the 2009 revision of AR 220-1. Units will begin reporting on a single METL in the USR effective 15 December 2009.

  3. What Readiness Reporting is and is not • AR 220-1 is: • Authoritative policy for readiness reporting IAW Congressional, OSD, Joint Staff, and Army readiness reporting requirements. • Unifies Army unique and externally directed readiness and information reporting requirements into a single report . • AR 220-1 is not: • Proponent for Standardizing METL. Standardized METL is a CSA/TRADOC initiative. • Proponent for specific deployability criteria or for manning and equipping requirements. • ARFORGEN synchronization mechanism • C-Levels are: • Assessments based on the status of resources available and training conducted in the unit measured against its wartime/designed capabilities. • Army units are designed to possess capabilities across the spectrum of conflict – C-Ratings represent this. • C-Levels are not: • An assessment of capabilities for only a portion of the spectrum of the conflict. • A comparison of unit capabilities over time (organizational documents, i.e. MTOEs change on a routine basis). • METL assessments. METL assessment support the training level determination. POLICY READINESS LEVELS Don’t push complex analysis to unit commanders. AR 220-1 sets the reporting requirements (input) and the DRRS-Army system facilitates analysis (output).

  4. THE BIG CHANGE (AR 220-1) THE USR IS ONE REPORT Commanders Unit Status Report (CUSR) C-Level How well a unit is resourced and trained, measured against the core functions of the unit. A-Level (feeds JS PCTEF data requirement) How well a unit is resourced and trained measured against the “assigned mission” requirements of the unit. CORE/DESIGNED MISSION READINESS ASSIGNED MISSION READINESS One Report contains both designed and assigned mission assessments Fulfills Existing Joint Staff Requirements (supports Congressional Oversight, Chairman’s Risk Assessment, and other COCOM oriented assessments) Army Only Changes in AR 220-1 Revision Core Functions = MTOE/TDA Assigned Mission Manning Assigned Mission Equipping Personnel Equipment on Hand Equipment Serviceability Training Single METL Commanders report this assessment when assigned a mission IAW Trigger criteria. Commanders always report this assessment monthly • A-Level Reporting Trigger. Commanders report A-Level when one condition is met: • When mission is assigned or when directed. • When the focus of training is the deployed mission environment. • Beginning at LAD minus 180 days FY 09 Revision is the 5th update to Army readiness reporting since 2001.

  5. The METL Reporting Process • THE SINGLE METL CONCEPT • One METL • Standardized FSO METL or Standardized CMETL for selected Operating Force units at BDE level and above • “As Designed” METL for remaining units (Operating and Generating Force) • Additive tasks (possible for “out of design missions” ONLY) THE SINGLE METL PROCESS The Single METL METL Standardized by TRADOC? OF? Standardized FSO METL or CMETL (42 unit types: About 200 units BDE & Above) THE KEY ISSUE YES YES NO METL based on MTOE design & aligned with the METL of the next higher command) (5000+ BDEs, BNs & Sep CO/DET) NO METL reflecting Core functions / designed capabilities (800+ GF units)

  6. Proposed Milestones for AR 220-1 (Based on Final Manuscript Including FSO METL ) 15 AUG 09 1 SEP 15 SEP 1 OCT 15 OCT 1 NOV 15 NOV 1 DEC 15 DEC 1 JAN Review, Authentication and Publication by APD USR Policy & Procedures Develop FSO METL Reporting Concept OTJAG Legal Review 1 NOV 09 – 31 JAN 10 AR 220-1 Implementation Based on Final Manuscript Global Readiness Conference Army METL Review Board (AMRB) Final Manuscript to Field & WARNORD Army Readiness Council ALARACT to Field 15 -17 SEP 09 2 - 3 SEP 09 TRADOC Input 15 NOV 09 15 DEC 09 1 NOV 09 20-22 OCT 09 Implement AR 220-1 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE AR 220-1 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE NetUSR Development Schedule DRRS-ARMY USER TRAINING 1 SEP 09 – 25 NOV 09 Distribute NetUSR version. 2.3 to the Field Units Report FSO METL Using NetUSR version. 2.3 (NetUSR Test & Evaluation) (Full Dress Rehearsal 1) T & E FDR 1 6–7 OCT 09 24 NOV 09 15 DEC 09 9–12 NOV 09 NetUSR Software Deliverable This is what the implementation of the FY 09 AR 220-1 delivers: FSO METL, A-Level with AMM & AME, Operational Environment, New S-Page with Enhanced Accountability Features, New P-Page with the New Medical Readiness Classifications & New PME Status Reporting Requirements and New ARFORGEN Force Pools/Force Types & C-5 Reporting Requirements. FOUO / Predecisional

  7. QUESTIONS

More Related