1 / 8

Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status

Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status. Measurement carried out in collaboration between LNGS ILIAS-JRA1 and ICARUS groups. Purposes.

rcantrell
Télécharger la présentation

Neutron background measurement at LNGS: present status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutron background measurement at LNGS:present status Measurement carried out in collaboration between LNGS ILIAS-JRA1 and ICARUS groups

  2. Purposes • Measurement of the spectrum and intensity of the neutron flux (fast component) in the LNGS underground laboratory by means of liquid scintillator counters (about 4 litres) and pulse shape discrimination (PSD) techniques. • This activity is mainly focused on the evaluation of possible fluctuations with time of the neutron intensity. • Identification of the physical correlation with environmental parameters.

  3. Overview • April 2005 calibration in the Baradello-Como underground lab. • February 2005 received first 2 litres BICRON cell • June 2005 received second 2 litres BICRON cell • July 2005 calibration with neutron beams at LNL • August 2005 installation at LNGS hall A of electronics 2 x 2 litres cells 2 x 0.3 litres cells • September 2005 start of the data acquisition • March 2006 installation of a lead shield (8 mm) to reduce the stochastic contribution induced by gamma background • 15 March 2006 is considered the starting date for regular data taking

  4. DAQ 0.3 litre cells 2 litres cells Electronics Set up in Hall A

  5. Data taking • From 15 March 2006 data have been acquired continuously. • Up to now (Feb. 2007) about 2x109 triggers have been recorded and about 700 neutron interactions have been identified (E>3.5 MeV) . • The stability of the system has been regularly monitored both by means of gamma-source calibrations and by means of internal calibrations based on measurement of alpha-lines produced by the liquid scintillator radioactive contaminants.

  6. Data analysis • The recorded data frequencies are: 5x 106 interactions per day 1x 103 interactions per day selected by hardware PSD 5x 102 interactions per day selected by software PSD Considering that the contribution to the rate due to stochastic events and radioactive impurities above 3.5 MeV (energy proton equivalent) are negligible, we have: 2 interactions (neutrons) per day above E=3.5 MeV (0.5 neutrons per day per litre of scintillator) • This frequency is compatible with a background neutron field of about 10-7 cm-2 s-1 as previously measured in the LNGS laboratory.

  7. The presence of fluctuations of the counting rate beyond the statistical fluctuation is evident in the data taking. Example of dependence with time of the neutron counting rate (neutron interactions per month) as recorded by one cells in the LNGS lab.. • Identification of the physical correlation with environmental parameters, such as the rock moisture, ground water level and pressure, … is in progress.

  8. Conclusions and Perspectives • In March 2007 a year of data taking will be reached. • The collected data will be enough to perform an evaluation of possible fluctuations with time of the neutron intensity within a one-year cycle. • A cross-check with data collected in absence of the external neutron field could be useful. • For this purpose, in March/April 2007, a polyethylene shield will be installed around the apparatus (at least one counter). A dedicated run in these conditions will allow, in addition, the evaluation of the actual internal radioactive contamination and to figure out the effective sensitivity of the detector.

More Related