1 / 22

F08 – 72 – OUTGRESP First Contingency Outage Response for SIUC

F08 – 72 – OUTGRESP First Contingency Outage Response for SIUC. Client: SIUC Physical Plant Engineering Services Team Members: Rudy Probst, EE Kyle Moore, EE Terry Campanella, PM, EE/CpE Clint Frederick, EE Phil Craig, EE Tanner Jones, EE

reece-lucas
Télécharger la présentation

F08 – 72 – OUTGRESP First Contingency Outage Response for SIUC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. F08 – 72 – OUTGRESPFirst Contingency Outage Response for SIUC Client: SIUC Physical Plant Engineering Services Team Members: Rudy Probst, EE Kyle Moore, EE Terry Campanella, PM, EE/CpE Clint Frederick, EE Phil Craig, EE Tanner Jones, EE Faculty Advisor: Dr. Constantine Hatziadoniu Client Contact: Steve Lazorchak, PE

  2. Outline of Topics • Executive Summary – Rudy • Description, Options, and Justification – Kyle • Mechanical Considerations Subsystem – Terry • System Protection Subsystem – Clint • Universal Transformer Subsystem – Phil • Summary – Tanner

  3. Executive Summary • Issue: Major transformer failure Summer 2008 causing a major outage • Project: Reduce outage time • Typically SIUC reacts to failure instead of preparation

  4. Executive Summary • Expectations • Feeder diagram for fault protection • Emergency transformer • Mechanical restrictions • Outage plan • Outcome • Simulation of feeder diagram • Transformer recommendation • Recommendations to reduce outage time

  5. Executive Summary • Results • Feeder diagram not as accurate as desired • On time • On budget • Estimated cost to implement: ~$92,000 • Time to implement: Estimated 8 months • Cost of study: $0

  6. Options Investigated • Do nothing • Purchase 1 transformer • Purchase 2 transformers • Mobile transformer • 3 banked single-phase transformers • Form consortium to share costs

  7. Option Chosen • Purchase two transformers • Covers both 480V and 208V transformers • Covers most indoor transformers on feeder 7 • Investigate consortium option • Many other institutions have similar issues • Coverage against failure of two transformers with same secondary voltage

  8. Subsystems Flowcharts • Implementing recommendations: • Will reduce outage time at least eight hours • Saves money after five uses of each transformers

  9. Cost and Time to Implement • Costs • Two $46,000 transformers • Storage facility • Time • Analyze, confirm, and design replacement : 20 man-hours • Finalize contracts to build: eight man-hours • Prepare storage area: unknown • Develop plan to replace transformers: 58 man-hours

  10. Mechanical Considerations • Engineering C – 2 transformers • No clear pathway to the surface • Tunnels covered with desks, coal samples, chairs, file cabinets, etc. • Will have to avoid steam piping and ledges

  11. Replacement Location • Limited by breaker handles • Block pathway to open area of electrical room • Wide open space at backside of electrical room • Need cabling to avoid access locations • Nails in ceiling limit ability to run cabling

  12. Limiting Factors

  13. Problems at Arena

  14. Ideal Tunnel…

  15. Actual Tunnel…

  16. System Protection • Ensure that replacement transformers and the electrical system will be properly protected against fault currents • Chose feeder seven to do a protection study • Built a model in EasyPower • System data

  17. System Protection • Replaced the present transformers with our specified replacement transformers • 1000 kVA 12,470 V Δ – 4160 V Δ / 480 V Y %Z = 4.5 • 1000 kVA 12,470 V Δ – 4160 V Δ / 208 V Y %Z = 4.5 • Ran the simulation

  18. Time-Current Characteristic Curve

  19. Universal Transformer • Must be electrically and mechanically compatible • Several options considered • Fourteen of fifteen transformers 208 V or 480 V secondary voltage • Thirteen of fifteen transformers rated 1000 kVA or less • Most outdoor transformers are non-critical

  20. Mobile Transformer • Determined to be non-feasible • Cable length to transformer location presents problems • Voltage drop • Safety hazards • Security of power system

  21. Summary • Reduce outage periods • Save money for SIUC • Recommend database for all power equipment at SIUC • Estimated cost to implement: ~$92,000 • Time to implement: estimated 8 months

  22. Summary - Acknowledgements • Steve Lazorchak • Damon Adams • Rob Estes • Justin Harrell • Rick Martin • Joe Wolfe • Keith Field • Mrs. Purcell • Dr. Hatziadoniu

More Related