1 / 17

Solar System observations with APEX

Solar System observations with APEX. Emmanuel Lellouch. Observatoire de Paris, France. A few commonplaces. Improved sky transmission with respect to currently available facilities (JCMT, CSO, IRAM, etc…) Lower noise level in bands covered by other telescopes (1300,800,450,350 µm)

regina-acosta
Télécharger la présentation

Solar System observations with APEX

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Solar System observations with APEX Emmanuel Lellouch Observatoire de Paris, France

  2. A few commonplaces • Improved sky transmission with respect to currently available facilities (JCMT, CSO, IRAM, etc…) • Lower noise level in bands covered by other telescopes (1300,800,450,350 µm) • Higher frequencies available (1.0 THz, 1.3 THz)  access to stronger lines and/or new molecules • However, Tsys worse at higher freqs  compromises and feasibility to be studied • ‘’Small’’ antenna (compared to IRAM-30 m)  dilution effects more severe (esp. for planets) • Partly compensated by higher working frequencies e.g. beam = 7’’ at 820 GHz = 30-m telescope beam at 330 GHz • A Southern hemisphere telescope • Solar System objects are moving  need to implement a tracking system – position, velocity – for planets, comets, satellites

  3. Areas • Planetary atmospheres • Cometary atmospheres • Small bodies (continuum) ??

  4. Planetary atmospheres at mm/submmwavelengths • Molecular lines  • Molecular abundances and vertical profiles • Thermal sounding • Wind sounding (Doppler shift) • Bandwidth ~ 1 GHz  sounded pressures < 0.3 bar • Thermal / wind sounding requires spatial resolution Venus Mars Jupiter Io Saturn Titan Uranus Neptune Pluto 10-60’’ 5-25’’ 45’’ 1’’ 18’’ 0.8’’ 3.5’’ 2’’ 0.1’’  In general interferometers better suited (PdB, SMA… ALMA) • APEX: more suited to study « chemistry » than « dynamics »

  5. Molecules detected in planetary atmospheres at mm/submm (>100µm) Venus: CO + isotopes, H2O, HDO, SO2 (?) Mars: CO + isotopes, H2O, HDO, H2O2 Jupiter: CO, HCN + isotopes, CS (+C34S), H2O*, CH4 Io: SO2, SO, NaCl Saturn: H2O, CH4 Titan: CO + isotopes, HCN + isotopes, HC3N, CH3CN, H2O, CH4 Uranus: H2O Neptune: CO, HCN, H2O Pluto/Triton : none * From space (ISO, Cassini, SWAS, ODIN)

  6. Some goals for APEX • Monitor and map H2O (and H2O2 ?) in Venus and Mars • HDO 893 GHz ~50 times stronger than at 226 GHz • Mapping: discriminate diurnal vs. temporal variability • Search for new species in Venus (e.g. HCl at 1251 GHz, 5 times stronger than at 625 GHz)

  7. Determine location of CO in Saturn and Uranus • In Jupiter, CO has 3 sources (internal, external, SL9) • CO present in both Saturn and Uranus but origin (internal vs. external) unknown • CO 806 GHz ~20 times stronger than at 230 GHz and small beam From Thierry Fouchet

  8. Determine still poorly known stratospheric abundance of methane on Uranus and Neptune • Stratospheric abundance related to injection from troposphere through temperature minimum. Thought to be lower on Uranus due to more sluggish vertical transport • Use CH4 rotational lines (forbidden but still detected by Cassini on Jupiter, Saturn and Titan)  advantage: little sensitivity to temperature (unlike thermal IR) • Best APEX line: 1256 GHz Titan Cassini/CIRS spectrum

  9. Explore the chemistry of Io’s atmosphere • Search for new (esp. volcanic) species • E.g. CO (806 GHz), SiO (651 GHz), ClO (464 GHz), KCl • Determine isotopic ratios in SO2 (e.g. 936 GHz, 8x stronger than lines at 1mm) • Search for isotopic species • E.g. DCN on Titan ( D/H in HCN), 13CO in Neptune • Feasibility TBD SO2 221.965 GHz

  10. Comets • General goals of mm/submm observations of comets • Chemical inventory • ~20 molecules detected Similarity of composition with ISM ices and molecular hot cores • Isotopic ratios (D/H, 12C/13C, 16O/18O, 14N/15N, 32S/34S) Bockelée-Morvan et al. A&A 353, 1101, 2000

  11. Comets • Chemical diversity in comets Diversity among Oort cloud comets No systematic differences between Oort cloud and « Kuiper belt » comets (less CO in Jupiter family comets) Crovisier 2005

  12. Comets • Physics of cometary activity • Monitoring of production rates and relative abundances with heliocentric distance (Rh) e.g. HNC/HCN increases with decreasing (Rh) • Coma dynamics and physics (extended sources, velocity and temperature conditions in coma) Biver et al 2002

  13. Interest of APEX • A Southern telescope ! ( monitoring of inclined objects) • Specific goal: D/H ratio

  14. D/H in comets • Measured so far only in 3 Oort-cloud comets • In H2O • Enrichment factor = 12 w.r.t. protosolar value • Acquired in presolar cloud? • Acquired through ion-molecule reaction in outer cold nebula? • Acquired in presolar cloud and reprocessed in inner solar nebula? • In other molecules: measured only in DCN/HCN on 1 comet: enrichment factor ~ 100 • Need to measure D/H in more comets, especially in short-period comets (could be higher if formed in non-turbulent part of nebula)

  15. HDO detectability in comets Q(H2O) = 5 x 1028 s-1; D/H = 3 x 10-4 Noise estimation:1h integration, dual polarization ALMA: Tsys = 100 K; APEX: Tsys = 500 K Model :Tgaz = 30 K; Xne = 0.2

  16. Continuum of small bodies ? • Size/albedo determination of transneptunian objects from bolometric measurements • Marginally feasible with already available instrumentation (MAMBO, SCUBA) • Varuna: 3 sigma detection • UB313: 5 sigma detection (Bertoldi et al, Nature, 2 feb 06) • Problem: LABOCA sensitivity does not seem much better • LABOCA: typical rms ~ 1.5 mJy/hr at 850 µm ~ SCUBA • MAMBO: ~ 0.6 mJy/hr at 1200 µm • Object flux varies in -2 : S/N(MAMBO) ~ S/N (LABOCA) • 295 channels: useless for planetary purposes

More Related