1 / 18

YSO Jets: Feedback, Meso and Macro-scales

YSO Jets: Feedback, Meso and Macro-scales. Adam Frank University of Rochester Andrew Cunningham(!) , Kris Yirak Eric Blackman, Alice Quillen,. Feedback and “Protostellar” Turbulence. Can space-filling isotropic turbulence be driven by sticking needles, (balloons) into molecular clouds?

ronia
Télécharger la présentation

YSO Jets: Feedback, Meso and Macro-scales

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. YSO Jets: Feedback, Meso and Macro-scales Adam Frank University of Rochester Andrew Cunningham(!), Kris Yirak Eric Blackman, Alice Quillen,

  2. Feedback and “Protostellar” Turbulence. • Can space-filling isotropic turbulence be driven by sticking needles, (balloons) into molecular clouds? • How to multiple outflows interact with a heterogenious medium • Can we explicate mechanisms by which time-dependent jets give up energy/momentum to turbulent medium. • Can we find connection with observational strutures. • Can we connect the properties of the stars to the properties of the outflows • Observation: total outflow energy budgets = cloud turbulent energy • Observation: Parsec outflows common • Volume fill ratio • L=1 pc, Rbs=0.1 pc, N=32 pc-3 => • 32 protostars pc-3 = whole cloud or core overrun by outflows. • Tens/Hundreds proto-stars eject enough Ek replenish Eturb.

  3. Feedback on Meso & Maco Scales. • Mesoscopic = the scale of individual outflow • (L < 1 pc) • Macroscopic = scale of the entire cluster ( L ~ 1 pc)

  4. The Tool:AstroBEAR AMR Code • “Block” AMR – Retain grids upon refinement (Burger & Collella) • Set of Riemann solvers (Full, Roe, MHD). • Parallel – load balance and domain decomposition • Built-in physics modules: • Time-dependent Ionization and H2Chemistry • heat conduction (multi-grid) • *self-gravity • *rad trans (diff limit) • MHD Flux conservation via CT

  5. Radiative Outflows in Heterogenious MediaCunningham, Frank, Varniere & Mitran 2007

  6. Project 1:Outflow Collisions as a Route to TurbulenceExplore effect of single collisions on accelerating ambient material. (Jet)2, (Wide Angle Wind) 2.Vary impact parameter b Cunningham, Frank & Blackman 2006

  7. Results b=rj b=5rj b=0 b=0 b=rj b=5rj

  8. b = 0 b = rj b = 5.3 rj • RESULTS • For jets we find n ~ 1.7 • Little difference between interacting (b = 0, rj) and non-interacting cases (b >> rj)! • Surface Area Effect – 2 jets become 1 M vs V Plots • M(v) or dP/dv diagnostic for molecular outflows • Power law for low velocities. Collisions reduce effective “entrainment” Increase Radiative Losses Bad for turbulence. Jet WAJ

  9. Project 2:Fossil Cavities as Intermediaries to Protostellar TurbulenceObservations of NGC 1333 : Quillen et al 2005Simulations of Fossil CavitiesCunningham et al 2006

  10. Project 2: NGC 1333: A Test Case(Quillen et al 2005) • NGC 1333: Numerous active outflows • Explore High Rez 13CO Data - No correlatation of outflows with velocity dispersion • But…numerous low V cavities seen in channel maps. • No stellar source at center of cavities – Fossil Cavities of extinct outflows. • In Fossil Cavities: Ek(outflow) ~ Eturb

  11. Cavity SimulationsCunningham, Frank, Blackman & Quillen 2006 • Explore time-decaying Jets/WAW outflow evolution (Bertout et al 96) • Outflow power decays after 104 y. • Simulation runs for 105 y • Run to 0.5 pc scales • Compare with scaling relations of Quillen et al 2005 • Compare with PV diagrams

  12. Fossil Cavity Sims: Jets and WAW Collimated Jet Wide Angle Wind (Matzner Class Sol) • Strong deceleration • Rarefactions backfill cavity

  13. Fossil Cavity Sims: Results Quillen et al scaling relation for momentum Simulation comparison: deviation from scaling relation small WAW jets Time dependent jets/wind = fossil cavities = turbulent support

  14. Project 3:Radiative Jets in Turbulent MediaThe mechanism for a single jetCunningham et al. 2006

  15. Project 3: Jets in a Turbulent Environment 2-D slices of 3-D simulation

  16. Project 3: Jets in a Turbulent Environment

  17. Future: Focus on Individual ObjectsL1551

  18. Conclusions • Colliding Jets • Interactions of active Jets may not matter • Look at time and space domain • NGC 1333/Fossil Cavities • Active jets do not couple well to cloud • Fossil cavities “store” momentum • Energy and Momentum budgets OK • Fossil cavities “well represented” by transient jets

More Related