1 / 11

Overlay Networking Research @NTG

Overlay Networking Research @NTG. Srinivasan Seetharaman Fall 2006. Overlay Networks. Overlay networks help overcome functionality limitations of the Internet by forming a virtual network on top of the IP network. Overlay nodes collaborate to offer multiple services:

scout
Télécharger la présentation

Overlay Networking Research @NTG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overlay Networking Research@NTG Srinivasan Seetharaman Fall 2006

  2. Overlay Networks • Overlay networks help overcome functionality limitations of the Internet by forming a virtual network on top of the IP network. • Overlay nodes collaborate to offer multiple services: • Multicast (Ex: ESM, Overcast) • Alternate paths (Ex: RON, Detour, X-Bone, Brocade) • Customized forwarding (Ex: I3, Scattercast) • QoS (Ex: OverQoS, SON) • Name resolution, Intelligent routing…

  3. Overlay Networks (contd.) • Typical features: • Overlay routing is independent of IP layer routing(Possibly with functionality overlap) • End-system overlays (Ex: Skype), or Service overlays (Offer services to actual end-systems) • Each Overlay link is actually an IP route between the two overlay nodes • Each Overlay path is comprised of one or more Overlay links, inline with a certain objective

  4. Example: Latency-Optimized paths • Potential for selfish behavior. Impact varies based on the • percentage of overlay traffic • scale of overlay networks A 50ms D 20ms 20ms C B Relaying

  5. A D 20ms 20ms C B Relaying What can go wrong? • Overlay routes can violatenative layer polices- [Srini ICNP06] • Extra load on native linkscausing bottleneck issues.Serious issue when nativelayer wants load balance.- [Srini Ongoing] • Failure detected by both layers and rerouted twice,with each rerouting disrupting the optimality of the previous.- [Srini Infocom06]

  6. A D 20ms 20ms C B Relaying What can go wrong? (contd.) • Sub-optimal performance becauseof lack of cooperation. Potentiallya chicken-and-egg problem- [Srini Hotnets05] • Topology (Nodes+Links)placement is tricky- [Jinliang Infocom06, Sridhar Ongoing, YongZhu Infocom06] • Overlay routing can clash with TCP congestion control- [Ruomei Ongoing]

  7. 1. BGP Policy Violations • Example violation over Planetlab and its benefit 6.3ms lower latency = 10.48% gain • Transit policy is violated in the above example. Harvard Univ pays its provider unnecessarily and unavoidably.

  8. 3. Dual Rerouting 2 G 3 Consider a native link failure in CE • Only overlay link AE is affected. • The native path AE is rerouted over F(ACE → ACFDE) A I 3 2 4 E OVERLAY NATIVE G B I A ∞ F C H + Cost Overlay recovery: 8 E D Original: 2 Native Rerouting: 2 Overlay rerouting: 4 Time Native Failure Native Recovery Native Repair

  9. 4. ESM-Friendly Native Network • Reduce extra copies on some links • No extra copies on each link • Latency to reach C is less… If there were native layer support A D New packet replication capability Similar in spirit to REUNITE, Packet reflection C B

  10. What can go right? 0. The services listed earlier, viz. QoS, Multicast, resilience, intelligent routing, security • Improve performance of TCP using schemes like Overlay-TCP- [Pradnya Networking05] • Improve services offered at the native layer by deploying them at the overlay layer (Ex: Name resolution)- [Sridhar Ongoing] • Creating improved service-based architectures and end-system driven functionalities- Anyone interested?

  11. References • Jinliang Fan, Mostafa Ammar, "Dynamic Reconfiguration of Service Overlay Networks," IEEE INFOCOM, 2006. [PDF] • Yong Zhu and M. Ammar, "Algorithms for assigning substrate network. resources to virtual network components," IEEE INFOCOM, 2006. [PDF] • Pradnya Karbhari, M.Ammar, E. Zegura, "Optimizing End-to-End Throughput for Data Transfers on an Overlay-TCP Path", IFIP Networking, 2005. [PS] • S. Seetharaman and M. Ammar, "Characterizing and Mitigating Inter-domain Policy Violations in Overlay Routes," IEEE ICNP, 2006. [PDF] • S. Seetharaman and M. Ammar, "On the Interaction between Dynamic Routing in the Overlay and Native Layers," IEEE INFOCOM, 2006. [PDF] • S. Seetharaman and M. Ammar, "Overlay-Friendly Native Network: A Contradiction in Terms?," ACM HOTNETS IV, 2005. [PDF]

More Related