1 / 38

DVCIC Activities and Results - Year Two

DVCIC Activities and Results - Year Two. Committee/Board Meeting and Symposium. UW-Madison Pyle Center February 12-13, 2004. Presentation Outline. Provide “Updated” DVC Numbers State Clearinghouse Objectives Summarize some Website Statistics and Other Information Sharing Activities

sheena
Télécharger la présentation

DVCIC Activities and Results - Year Two

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DVCIC Activitiesand Results - Year Two Committee/Board Meetingand Symposium UW-Madison Pyle Center February 12-13, 2004

  2. Presentation Outline • Provide “Updated” DVC Numbers • State Clearinghouse Objectives • Summarize some Website Statistics and Other Information Sharing Activities • Update of Clearinghouse Activities: • Updated Toolbox Results/Status • Regional DVC Data Management Survey • UW Sign Study • Activities for Next Year

  3. 2002

  4. WISCONSIN NUMBERS • Pretty Constant the Last Few Years • One of Six or Seven Crashes • Some Counties > 45 or 50% • 2002 - About 20,000 Reported

  5. REGIONAL NUMBERS (2000-2002) Notes: 1) Deer or Animal Crashes. 2) Reported versus Estimated. 3) $1,700/Crash Vehicle Damage. 4) National Estimates.

  6. TRB Subcommittee Synthesis and NCHRP Project States/Provinces Michigan New Jersey Texas Utah South/North Carolina Georgia Minnesota Ontario British Columbia Saskatchewan Montana Pool: California Iowa Indiana Maryland North Dakota New Hampshire Nevada New York Oregon Wisconsin Wyoming NATIONAL ACTIVITIES

  7. DVCIC OBJECTIVES • Compile Current DVC-Related Knowledge • Develop/Promote Standard DVC-Related Research and DVC Data Collection/Information Management Approaches

  8. DVCIC OBJECTIVES (Cont.) • Collect, Evaluate, and Analyze Regional DVC-Related Data • Create/Update DVC-Related Data Information System

  9. DVCIC OBJECTIVES (Cont.) • Distribute Useful DVC-Related Information/Findings through the Following Deliverables: • Countermeasure Toolbox • Data Management and Information Survey • Standards Proposal • Regional Data Collection Summary • Webpage (www.deercrash.com)

  10. DVCIC OBJECTIVES (Cont.) • Maintain/Update Information Sources and Knowledge Exchange: • Webpage (www.deercrash.com) • DVC Database and Annual Summary • Papers/Presentations (TAC, TRB, and Others) • Annual Regional Symposia

  11. DVCIC OBJECTIVES (Cont.) • Long-Term: • Contribute to a Decrease in the Frequency and Severity of Deer-Vehicle Crashes (i.e., Useful Information and Monitoring) • “Destination of Choice”

  12. WEBSITE AND INFO SHARING • Website: • Est. 200+ hits per day • Est. 15 Users per day • Noise Devices Site Most Popular • Significant Resource for IIHS Report • Meetings: 2003 TAC, 2004 TRB, 2003 ICOET, 2003 Iowa Mid-Continent, and 2004 Winter WI Cty. Comm.

  13. INFO SHARING (Cont.) • Numerous Media Responses: • Wisconsin Outdoor Journal • Men’s Health Magazine • Canadian Broadcasting Corporation • Milwaukee Public Radio - “At Ten”, and WGN

  14. THE TOOLBOX • Objective: Provide Detail Needed to Support/Defend DVC Countermeasure Application Choices and Decisions • Current Knowledge Related to DVC Reduction Effectiveness • 16 Countermeasures

  15. Noise/Sound/Whistle Devices Reflectors/Mirrors Deer-Flagging Models Deer Crossing Signs Intercept Feeding Speed Limit Reduction Highway Lighting Repellants Deicing Salt Alternatives In-Vehicle Technologies THE COUNTERMEASURES • Roadside Vegetation Management • Hunting or Herd Reduction • Exclusionary Fence • Roadway Development Decisions • Public Information and Education • Wildlife Crossings (Ongoing)

  16. COUNTERMEASURE UPDATES • Noise/Sound/Whistle Devices • UPDATE: Acoustical Physicist Investigated Combinations of Device Sound Levels, Deer Hearing Range, and Necessary Field Characteristics for Effectiveness • Deer Crossing Signs/Tech. • More Systems (Proposed and Running) and Options • Deicing Salt Alternatives • ROW Salt Ponds and Moose Hits in Canada

  17. NEW 2003 SUMMARIES • Exclusionary Fencing • Range of Fencing Studies With and Without Complementary Infrastructure/Activities • One-Way Gates • Wildlife Crossings • Active Maintenance and Animal Removal • Cattleguards • 60 to 97 Percent Reduction Range in Animal Mortality (Result Patterns?) • Primarily 8-Foot (2.44-Meter) Fencing Used - Studies of Other Heights are Questionable

  18. NEW 2003 SUMMARIES (Cont.) • Exclusionary Fencing • Potential Factors that Impact Fencing Effectiveness: • Proper Installation (e.g., Height, Location/Length, and Strength) • Active Maintenance/Repair • Complementary Infrastructure • Vigilant Removal of Animals • Location with Respect to Woods, Grazing Land, and Topography • Suggested Extension of Ends 1/2-mile (0.8 km) beyond Activity Area

  19. NEW 2003 SUMMARIES (Cont.) • Roadside Vegetation Management • Suspected DVC Impacts are Mostly Anecdotal • Further Analysis/Study Needed • Summary Includes List/MN Tool Site • Public Awareness/Education and Hunting or Herd Reduction • Part of a Complete DVC-Reduction Program, but Impacts of Policy Changes are Difficult to Prove • No Studies on Educational DVC Impact • Models Show Relationships between Herd Density and DVC Trends (One of Several Variables) • Small Area Hunting Studies Show Some Potential

  20. NEW 2003 SUMMARIES (Cont.) • Roadway Development Decisions • Proposed: Inherent Consideration of Animal Mortality in Maintenance, Design, and Planning/Programming Decisions and Processes • Potential DVC-Reduction Impacts • Some GIS and Expert Systems Combining Habitat and Safety Information to Identify Existing/Proposed “Wildlife Critical” Locations

  21. ONGOING SUMMARY • Wildlife Crossings • Effectiveness Often Measured by Animal Use rather than DVC-Reduction • Some Potential Factors that Impact Use: Location, Adjacent Topography/Vegetation, Geometrics, Fencing, and Human Activity • Variability in Studies (e.g., Species, Crossing Designs, and Location) Limits Transferability of Specific Conclusions • Great Study Summary in “Road Ecology” Book

  22. ONGOING SUMMARY (Cont.)

  23. REGIONAL DATA SURVEY • Final Form on Web and then Hard Copy in Next Few Months • 9 DNR Questions and 18 DOT Questions • Written Responses and Telephone Follow-Up • Primary Focus: Deer, Vehicle Travel, and DVC Data Characteristics, Collection, and Management

  24. SURVEY(Cont.) • Objectives • Share DVC-Related Data Characteristics and Collection/Management Procedures Used by Individual States with DVCIC Partners and Beyond • Allow Proper DVC-Related Data Comparisons Between and Within States • Allow Proper DVC-Related Data Combinations within Region Annually and from Year to Year within States • Similar National Consideration at TRB

  25. SOME DATA SURVEY CONCLUSIONS • Annual Deer Population Estimates done Pre- or Post-Hunt at DMU or County Level • DNRs Rarely Consulted on Roadway Planning Projects about Animal/Vehicle Conflicts • Other States: Carcass Removal Primarily a State and Local DOT Job - Done When Needed but Usually not Recorded • DNRs Typically Not Consulted about Deer Crossing Sign Locations

  26. CONCLUSIONS (Cont.) • States in Region are Using Reflectors, Fencing/Bridges, Crossing Signs, and Crossing Signs with Detectors as Countermeasures (Some Studied for Effectiveness) • Minimum Crash Reporting Thresholds Vary ($400 to $1,000) and Almost all Have Changed during Last 10 Years • Two DOTs Appear to have a Rule of Thumb Consideration to Install Crossing Signs

  27. UW SIGN STUDY • Presented at 2004 TRB/Paper on Website • Plotted Deer Carcass Removal (DCR) to DVC Ratios by County [State Average Ratio: 2.2] • Ranked Counties by Six DCR and DVC measures: • Total Magnitude • Per HMVMT • Roadway Mile • Land Area • Human Population • Deer Population

  28. SIGN STUDY CONTENT • Selected Five Counties/38 Sign Pairs • Considered 1/4-Mile and Segment DVC Rates and Frequencies • Evaluated DVC Peaking Patterns • Suggested Seven Step Installation Guidelines • State Average • County Average • DVC Peaking Between Signs

  29. Sign Locations 2 Mile Outside Segment 2 Mile Outside Segment Variable Length Between Segment TYPICAL STUDY SITE Study Site Length

  30. EXAMPLE 1/4-MILE DVC PATTERN

  31. PROPOSED INSTALLATION GUIDELINES • Step 1: Site Visit/Segment Definition • Determine Physical Limits • Discuss with Natural Resource Staff • < 1.0 Mile (Reconsider Sign Installation) • > 5.0 Miles (Consider Multiple sign Pairs) • Step 2: DVC Data Collection • Define Sign Segment Plus 2 Miles in Each Direction • Three Years of Location-Based DVC Data • County and State Averages

  32. INSTALLATION GUIDELINES (Cont.) • Step 3: DVC Measure Calculations • DVCs/mile/year and DVCs per HMVMT • 1/4-Mile and Average Segment Measures Between and Outside Signs • Step 4: State/County Average Comparison • Between Sign Average Measures > State Average • Between Sign Average Measures > County Average • If Either is Not True: Reconsider Installation

  33. INSTALLATION GUIDELINES (Cont.) • Step 5: Between to Outside Comparison • Calculate Between to Outside DVC Measure Ratio and Compare to 1.0 and County Average (If Available) • If Less than Either: Reconsider Installation • Step 6: Positive Sign Location (PSL) Determination • Is Site a PSL (i.e., Are 1/4-mile DVC Measures and Averages Between Signs of Study Site)? • If not: Redefine Proposed Sign Location and Study Site (See Step 7).

  34. INSTALLATION GUIDELINES (Cont.) • Step 7: Redefine Sign Study Site • Consider Peak DVC Measures for each 1/4-Mile, Between Signs, and Outside the Signs • Shift Study Site to Include All Measures Between Signs (i.e., a PSL Results) • Lengthen Study Site to Include All Measures Between Signs • If Redefined Length > 5 Miles Consider Multiple Sign Pairs • Reapply Procedure from Step 2 for Redefined Study Site

  35. GUIDELINE LIMITATIONS • Installation Only Allowed at Sites with DVC Problems > Existing Sites • Effectiveness Depends on Previous Decisions • Required Measures Can be Difficult to Collect, Calculate, and/or Update • Adjustments Needed if Applied to Existing Sign Locations

  36. FUTURE DVCIC ACTIVITIES • Print Regional Data Survey • Complete/Review Wildlife Crossings, Exec. Summary and Conc./Rec. of Toolbox • Collect 10 Years of Upper Midwest DVC-Related Data and Summarize • Update a UW County-Level DVC Prediction Models • Propose Research Guidance and Strategy • Pursue Clearinghouse Continuation Funding

  37. Questions and Discussion Website: www.deercrash.com

More Related