1 / 25

2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results

2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results. Data by Student Groups. 75% of all NEISD Campuses rated Exemplary or Recognized More than 90% of Elementary Campuses are rated Exemplary or Recognized 27% Increase in Exemplary campuses

sven
Télécharger la présentation

2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2003 – 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups

  2. 75% of all NEISD Campuses rated Exemplary or Recognized More than 90% of Elementary Campuses are rated Exemplary or Recognized 27% Increase in Exemplary campuses Once again, NEISD has more Exemplary campuses than any other district in Bexar County Major Highlights

  3. 2008 TAKS passing rates increased in every subject for every student group Marked improvement in Science for African Americans (+13%), Hispanic(+11%), and Economic Disadvantaged (13%) Major Highlights

  4. Are There Gaps in Student Achievement?

  5. Equity and Excellence forAll Students NO GAPS All Hispanic All White All African American All Economically Disadvantaged All Special Education Students All Limited English Proficient (LEP)

  6. Core Beliefs • All children are capable of high levels of academic success; • Academic success equitably includes all student groups; • Adults in schools are primarily responsible; • Traditional school practices result in inequity and must be changed.

  7. Process of Finding the Gaps • Look at current year results and compare them to prior years • Disaggregate by student groups • Close attention to ethnic groups and special populations • Use a variety of tabular and graphic formats • Look at our progress in closing gaps over time • Examine within and across ethnic groups and special populations to determine the extent of gaps

  8. 2008 District Accountability Rating

  9. % = % Pass All = Total W=White H =Hispanic AA = Afr. American ED=Eco. Disadvantaged

  10. High Schools What are educationally important differences - District ± 3%

  11. TAKS Reading/ELA Achievement GAPS:2003 - 2008

  12. TAKS Writing Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008

  13. TAKS Social Studies Achievement GAPS: 2003 - 2008

  14. TAKS Science Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008

  15. TAKS Math Achievement Gaps: 2003 - 2008

  16. 11 14 11 13

  17. 4 -4 -10

  18. 7 -1 -9

  19. Bottom Line • It is not about the gaps. Our goal is to make certain each and every child receives a quality education and is prepared for college and workforce readiness. NEISD Where Every Child Is Prepared for the Future

  20. The End

  21. Exemplary Recognized Acceptable 1604 Preliminary 2008 AEISAccountability Ratings:Elementary School

  22. Exemplary Recognized Acceptable 1604 Preliminary 2008 AEISAccountability Ratings:Middle School

  23. Exemplary Recognized Acceptable 1604 Preliminary 2008 AEISAccountability Ratings:High School Note: ISA is Exemplary

More Related