1 / 31

Perception of major acoustic cues

Perception of major acoustic cues. Astrid van Wieringen 5th European Master school on Language and Speech Bonn, 12-16 July 2004. Content of Tutorial.

tawana
Télécharger la présentation

Perception of major acoustic cues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perception of major acoustic cues Astrid van Wieringen 5th European Master school on Language and Speech Bonn, 12-16 July 2004

  2. Content of Tutorial • In order to understand why certain speech sounds are not perceived/recognized by hearing-impaired or automatic speech recogniser, one should understand: • major categories + acoustic properties of speech sounds • different types of tests & speech materials • how to assess transmission of robust spectral and temporal cues by means of analytical (phoneme) tests • data collection and analyses • hearing loss (with focus on cochlear implants) • Practical part: • Test perception of filtered speech sounds Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  3. Speech sounds - major categories • Vowel and consonant phonemes are classified in terms of • Manner of articulation • concerns how the vocal tract restricts airflow • completely stopping of airflow by an occlusion creates a plosive (stop consonant) • vocal tract constrictions of varying degree occur in liquids, fricatives, glides and vowels • lowering the velum causes nasal sounds • Place of articulation • refers to the location in the vocal tract • Voicing • presence/absence of vocal fold vibration Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  4. Manner of articulation of most consonants • Stop consonants (plosives): complete closure and subsequent release of a vocal tract obstruction. Pressure build-up followed by burst. • Liquids: like vowels, but tongue is used for some degree of obstruction. For /l/ air escapes around the tip of tongue or dorsum. The /r/ has more variable articulation • Nasals: a lowering of the velum. Airflow out of the nostrils. In English only nasalized consonants (oral tract completely closed), in French also nasalized vowels (air escapes through oral tract and nasal cavities). Vowels may be nasalized in English, but the distinction is not phonemic (= vowel identity does not change). In French there are pairs of vowels that differ only in the presence or absence of vowel nasalization. • Fricatives: narrow constriction in the oral tract (for some language in the pharynx and in the glottis). If the pressure behind the constriction is high enough and the passage sufficiently narrow, airflow becomes fast enough to generate turbulence at the end of the constriction • Strident fricatives: noise amplitude is enhanced by airflow striking a surface:  (shy) • Affricate= stop + fricative: d (gin) Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  5. Place of articulation (varies per language) Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  6. Place of articulation • Labials • bilabial: if both lips constrict • labiodental: if the lower lip contacts the upper teeth • Dental: the tongue tip or blade touches the edge or back of upper teeth • interdental: if the tip protrudes between the upper and lower teeth (‘the’) • Alveolar: the tongue tip or blade touches the alveolar ridge • Palatals: the tongue blade or dorsum constricts with the hard palate • retroflex: if the tongue tip curls up • Velar: the dorsum approaches the soft palate • Uvular: the dorsum approaches the uvula • Pharyngeal: constriction in the pharynx • Glottal: vocal folds close or constrict Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  7. Dutch vowel triangle Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  8. Major acoustic cues of stop consonants • /p, t, k, b, d, g/ • Phonetic features • Manner: stop (plosive) • Place (bilabial, alveolar, velar) • Acoustic cues • Silence (corresponds to the period of oral constriction = stop gap) • Voiced stops: low energy, also called voice bar • Burst: corresponds to the articulatory release of the oral constriciton and to aerodynamic release (due to build-up of pressure). Bursts occur in initial and medial position, rarely found in final position. Place of articulation may be signaled by spectrum of burst, but • Transition is also very important. Transition corresponds to the articulatory movement from oral constriction for the stop to the more open tract for a following sound (usually vowel). Easy to identify for voiced than for voiceless sounds. • Most important features: • stop gap • release burst • presence/absence of voice onset time • transition • voicing features Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  9. Duration of stop consonants • Stop gap: 50-100 ms • Burst: 5-40 ms (a ‘transient’ = disappears immediately, shortest event in speech!) • CV (consonant - vowel) and VC (vowel consonant) transitions: 10 - 40 ms. Reflects changes in the vocal tract. Very difficult to measure/analyze such a short event. However, perceptually very important! Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  10. Time-signals of Dutch plosives Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  11. Onset of • b • in • aba • Onset of • d • in • ada • / • / • / • / • / • / • / • / • 0.1817 • 0.296 • 0 • 0 • -0.1792 • -0.2195 • 0 • 0.0687982 • 0 • 0.0817687 • Time (s) • Time (s) • Onset of • p • in • apa • Onset of • t • in • ata • / • / • / • / • / • / • / • / • 0.221 • 0.276 • 0 • 0 • -0.2187 • -0.2101 • 0 • 0.0812925 • 0 • 0.111791 • Time (s) • Time (s) Initial part of Dutch plosives Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  12. aka • / • / • aba • apa • / • / • / • / • 4 • 10 • 4 • 4 • 10 • 10 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0.690023 • 0 • 0.677007 • 0 • 0.700023 • Time (s) • Time (s) • Time (s) • ada • ata • / • / • / • / • 4 • 4 • 10 • 10 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0.704014 • 0 • 0.675011 • Time (s) • Time (s) Spectrogram of Dutch plosives Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  13. Fricatives • Phonemes: • voiced /, , , / • voiceless: /,  , , , , / • Phonetic features: • manner: frication • place: labiodental, linguadental, alveolar, palatal, glottal • Acoustic cues: • voicing • frication noise: noise generated as air is forced through a narrow constriction. Then filtered by the vocal tract. • transitions to and from the vowels due to changes in the vocal tract • sibilants/ stridents have intense noise energy • non sibilants: weak noise energy Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  14. afa • ava • / • / • / • / • 4 • 4 • 10 • 10 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0.716032 • 0 • 0.754014 • Time (s) • Time (s) • asa • aza • / • / • / • / • 4 • 4 • 10 • 10 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0.738005 • 0 • 0.728027 • Time (s) • Time (s) Spectrograms of a few Dutch fricatives Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  15. Nasals • Phonemes: /m, n, / • Phonetic features: • manner: nasal • place: bilabial, alveolar, velar • Acoustic features: • murmur: as a result of nasal radiation of acoustical energy. The spectrum is dominated by low-freq. energy (< 500 Hz). Murmur cues of three different nasals are not exactly alike, but difficult as a distinctive cue • transitions: preceding and following vowels will be nasalized. Cues to place of articulation • voicing is always present (except during whispering) • Spectrum of nasals reflects a combination of formants and antiformants Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  16. Spectrograms of a few Dutch nasals Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  17. Glides • also called ‘ approximants ’ and semivowels: • gradual articulatory movement • vocal tract narrowed, not closed • Phonemes: /j/ & /w/ • Phonetic features • Manner: glide or semivowel • Place: palata l or labiovelar • Acoustic cues • A relatively slow transition (75-150 ms) • F1 of both sounds starts at very low value (a little higher than for stops) • F2 of /w/: 800 Hz Compare with /b/!!, F3 of /w/: 2200 Hz • F2 of /j/: 2200 Hz (compare wih /d/!!), F3 is 3000 Hz • longer glides: vowel-vowel sequences!: • [bi] - [wi]- [ui] and • [du] - [ju] - [iu] Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  18. Spectrograms of 2 Dutch glides Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  19. Liquids • Phonemes: /l/ & /r/ • Phonetic features: • Manner: lateral or rhotic • Place: alveolar for /l/, palatal for /r/ • Acoustic cues: rather complex: • both relatively fast formant transitions • similarity with glides: well-defined formant structure (less constriction than stops, fricatives, and affricates) • /l/: energy mainly in the low frequencies. Resonances and antiresonances due to divided vocal tract. Resembles /n/. F1: 360 Hz, F2: 1300 Hz, F3: 2700 Hz • /r/: similar for F1 • F2 somewhat lower than for /l/ • F3 especially lower (1650 Hz). Durations of formant transitions somewhat longer for /r/ than for /l/ • temporal cues: • /r/: F1 has a short steady-state + relatively long transition • /l/: F1 has a long steady-state + relatively short transition Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  20. Spectrograms of 2 Dutch liquids • no clear distinction between vowel and consonant • F3 of /r/ lower Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  21. Speech perception assessment for the hearing-impaired Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  22. Speech perception assessment • Required for diagnostic purposes • monitoring progress in a rehabilitation programme • comparison of different speech processing strategies (hearing aids and ochlear implants) • understand “limited” technology/number of channels available for hearing impaired or implantees • hearing aid: speech divided into frequency bands. Acoustically enhanced • cochlear implant: acoustical sound is picked up by microphone, analyzed into frequency bands, coded and sent to limited number of electrode pairs in the inner ear (electrical stimulation) Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  23. How a cochlear implant works... (MedEL) • (1)Sounds are picked up by a microphone and turned into an electrical signal.(2) This signal goes to the speech processor where it is "coded" (turned into a special pattern of electrical pulses).(3) These pulses are sent to the coil and are then transmitted across the intact skin (by radio waves) to the implant.(4) The implant sends a pattern of electrical pulses to the electrodes in the cochlea.(5) The auditory nerve picks up these tiny electrical pulses and sends them to the brain. (6) The brain recognizes these signals as sound. Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  24. Tutorial article on cochlear implants that appeared in the IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pages 101-130, September 1998. Introduction to cochlear implants Philipos C. Loizou Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  25. Figure of electrode array in the cochlea... • Necessary to ‘map’ (fit) acoustical information to electrical information.... Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  26. 8 7 6 5 A amplitude per channel 4 3 2 1 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 time (ms) Top: Output of the CIS algorithm for the word ‘som’. Pulse channels reflect the envelopes of the bandpass filter output Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  27. Transmission of AMA & ASA by a CI device Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  28. Analytical tests: purpose and performance • Many types of speech tests to evaluate CI performance • detection of environmental sounds • identification of male/female voice • identification of vowels and consonants (V & C) in nonsense cont. • words • sentences • Each type of test triggers a different level of performance. • Why is a carefully balanced V & C test important? • /paat/, /pit/, /poot/, etc., or /apa/, /ara/, /ana/, • it gives important information on the transmission of speech features via the implant and hearing aid (e.g. voiced- voicelessness, nasality of /m/ or high frequency frication/turbulence of /s/) • analytical: no contextual information • therefore, information can guide the fitting of an implant Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  29. Choice of test depends on objectives, BUT • speech stimuli should be • carefully pronounced and, if possible, adjusted to the same RMS level (so that other cues are kept in hand) • presented via hard disc of PC, CD or tape (recorded at highest level of quality) • administered to the subject in a quiet room (if presented acoustically) • presented a sufficient number of times to obtain a reliable score • Note: an analytical test does not replace other tests, but it measures speech perception based on auditory information alone. Can be used for several languages. • At the Lab. Exp. ORL recordings were made of Dutch vowels and consonants in different contexts. These were carefully selected from different tokens, segmented (with an additional hamming window to avoid on- and offset clicks), equalized in RMS (root mean square) and partly analyzed (with regard to their main spectral and temporal properties). • /aCa/: /p, t, k, b, d, r, l, m, n, s, f, z, v, w, j/. • /pVt/:/oe, ie, i, oo, o, ee, e, u, aa, a/ • All speech sounds were analyzed (frequency, duration, energy, …) Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  30. Confusionmatrix • Distribution of errors even more interesting • not random • can be quantified by means of an information transmission algorithm (Miller and Nicely, 1955) Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

  31. Effect of filtering • Loss of auditory information can be examined in normal-hearing persons by filtering away acoustical information: to allow certain frequencies to be transmitted while attenuating others. • a high-pass filter allow all components above a cutoff frequency to be transmitted • a band-pass filter allows frequencies within a certain band to pass • low-pass filter allow all components below a cutoff frequency to be transmitted • Demonstration of loss of acoustical cues! Astrid van Wieringen 12-16 July 2004

More Related