1 / 12

G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA 30332 – 0405 USA

Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team. G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA 30332 – 0405 USA. Problem Definition.

terryroy
Télécharger la présentation

G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA 30332 – 0405 USA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected DivertorsS. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta, GA 30332–0405 USA

  2. Problem Definition • Work on Liquid Surface Plasma Facing Components and Plasma Surface Interactions has been performed by the ALPS and APEX Programs • Operating Temperature Windows have been established for different liquids based on allowable limits for Plasma impurities and Power Cycle efficiency requirements • This work is aimed at establishing limits for the maximum allowable temperature gradients (i.e. heat flux gradients) to prevent film rupture due to thermocapillary effects • Spatial Variations in the wall and Liquid Surface Temperatures are expected due to variations in the wall loading • Thermocapillary forces created by such temperature gradients can lead to film rupture and dry spot formation in regions of elevated local temperatures • Initial Attention focused on Plasma Facing Components protected by a “non-flowing” thin liquid film (e.g. porous wetted wall)

  3. Problem Definition open B.C. at top, L L periodic B.C. in x direction Non-uniform heat flux yl>>ho Gas Gas ho initial film thickness ho initial film thickness Liquid Liquid y y Wall Wall x x Non-uniform wall temperature Initially, quiescent liquid and gas (u=0, v=0, T=Tm at t=0) Convective cooling Specified Non-uniform Surface Heat flux Specified Non-uniform Wall Temperature • Two Dimensional Cartesian (x-y) Model (assume no variations in toroidal direction) • Two Dimensional Cylindrical (r-z) Model has also been developed (local “hot spot” modeling)

  4. Governing Equations • Conservation of Mass • Momentum • Energy • Non-dimensional variables Specified Non-uniform Surface Heat flux Specified Non-uniform Wall Temperature

  5. Asymptotic Solution (Low Aspect Ratio Cases) • Long wave theory with surface tension effect (a<<1). Govering Equations reduce to : Specified Non-uniform Wall Temperature * Specified Non-uniform Surface Heat flux * [Bankoff, et al. Phys. Fluids (1990)] • Asymptotic solution used to analyze cases for Lithium, Lithium-lead, Flibe, Tin, and Gallium with different mean temperature and film thickness • Asymptotic solution produces conservative (i.e. low) temperature gradient limits • Limits for “High Aspect Ratio” cases analyzed by numerically solving the full set of conservation equations using Level Contour Reconstruction Method

  6. aNu=100 aNu=10-1 aNu=10-2 aNu=10-3 aNu=10-4 1/We=107 1/We=106 1/We=105 1/We=104 1/We=103 1/We=102 Asymptotic Solution (Low Aspect Ratio Cases) Maximum Non-dimensional Temperature Gradient (Ts/L)/(L2/Loho2) Maximum Non-dimensional Heat Flux Gradient a=0.02 (Q/L)/(aLgk/o) o/LgL2 1/Fr Specified Non-uniform Surface Heat flux Specified Non-uniform Wall Temperature • Similar Plots have been obtained for other aspect ratios • In the limit of zero aspect ratio

  7. Asymptotic Solution (Low Aspect Ratio Cases)– Specified Non-uniform Wall Temp (ho=1mm) • Property ranges * 1/We  ho, 1/Fr  ho3

  8. Asymptotic Solution (Low Aspect Ratio Cases)– Specified Non-uniform Surface Heat Flux • ho=10 mm, a=0.02 • ho=1 mm, aNu=1.0

  9. Phase 1 F e AtA -BtB Phase 2 A BtB n B s -CtC Numerical Solution (High Aspect Ratio Cases) • Evolution of the free surface is modeled using the Level Contour Reconstruction Method • Two Grid Structures • Volume - entire computational domain (both phases) discretized by a standard, uniform, stationary, finite difference grid. • Phase Interface - discretized by Lagrangian points or elements whose motions are explicitly tracked. n : unit vector in normal direction t : unit vector in tangential direction  : curvature • A single field formulation • Constant but unequal material properties • Surface tension included as local delta function sources • Variable surface tension : • Force on a line element normal surface tension force thermocapillary force

  10. black : blue : red : Numerical Solution(High Aspect Ratio Cases)- Specified Non-uniform Wall Temperature case using Lithium a=0.02 maximum y location y [m] y [m] minimum y location x [m] time [sec] velocity vector plot temperature plot • Two-dimensional simulation with 1[cm]0.1[cm] box size, 25050 resolution, and ho=0.2 mm

  11. Pr=40 Pr=0.4 Pr=0.004 Asymptotic Solution Numerical Solution(High Aspect Ratio Cases)- Specified Non-uniform Wall Temperature case a=0.02 1/Fr=101 1/Fr=103 1/Fr=105 (Ts/L)/(L2/Loho2) Maximum Non-dimensional Temperature Gradient 1/We 1/We 1/We

  12. Conclusions • Limiting values for the temperature gradients (or heat flux gradients) to prevent film rupture can be determined • Generalized charts have been developed to determine the temperature (or heat flux) gradient limits for different fluids, operating temperatures (i.e. properties), and film thickness values • For thin liquid films, limits may be more restrictive than surface temperature limits based on Plasma impurities (evaporation) constraint • Experimental Validation of Theoretical Model has been initiated • Preliminary results for Axisymmetric geometry (hot spot model) produce more restrictive limits for temperature gradients

More Related