1 / 8

FINDINGS CUMULATION AND REPORT WRITING

FINDINGS CUMULATION AND REPORT WRITING. LECTURE 8 META ANALYSIS EPSY 642 FALL 2009 Victor L. Willson. Meta-Analysis Report-Writing. Traditional journal approach: -Intro, lit review, methods, results, discussion -References: background, studies in meta analysis*

toby
Télécharger la présentation

FINDINGS CUMULATION AND REPORT WRITING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FINDINGS CUMULATION AND REPORT WRITING LECTURE 8 META ANALYSIS EPSY 642 FALL 2009 Victor L. Willson

  2. Meta-Analysis Report-Writing • Traditional journal approach: -Intro, lit review, methods, results, discussion -References: background, studies in meta analysis* -Tables: effects, SEs, Q’s, mediators, moderators -Figures: Cluster diagrams, funnel plots, graphs of effects by features • Literature review approach: -Thematic or theory focus: what lit exists, what does it say Tabular summarizations of works

  3. Theory section • What is already proposed or known about the outcome • What are the purported major mediators and moderators in the literature to date • What does the literature say about each above? What is the controversy

  4. Purpose of Study • Explain why a meta-analysis will resolve problems in the literature • State what the major outcome(s) to be examined • State the major theoretical predictors to be examined

  5. nsevigny@vpfn.tamu.edu Methods • Sample (or population) of studies • Sources used to find articles • Procedures for cross-referencing • Coding procedure • Coding menu (either as a table or appendix if possible) • Procedures for reliability of coding • Data analysis approach (eg. Lipsey & Wilson)

  6. Results • Descriptives: mean, SD, Q total, funnel plot or other figure of effects (see Lipsey & Wilson, for example) • Design artifacts- do any cause interpretation problems, and if so what did you do about them • Revised descriptives after design issues • Mediators and moderators of substantive interest

  7. Data Tables 1. summary of all articles- may have mean effect size or effects for each construct along with major independent variables 2. Table of Q statistics (may be in Table 1 above also) 3. Table of mediators and moderators 4. Any multiple regression analyses (vw does not recommend generally unless good theory for order of entry of predictors)

  8. Summary/Discussion • Refer to your original discussion of literature and theory • What did you find that resolves problems or differences • What new problems have arisen • What research was missing from your meta analysis? What should people study?

More Related