1 / 23

Cache River Monitoring 11-6000

Cache River Monitoring 11-6000. Jennifer L. Bouldin , PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University. Cache River. Delta – bottomland hardwood forests Agricultural land 2 main channels of watershed Cache & Bayou DeView. Cache River. 95% of watershed in NE AR

trung
Télécharger la présentation

Cache River Monitoring 11-6000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cache River Monitoring11-6000 Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University

  2. Cache River • Delta – bottomland hardwood forests • Agricultural land • 2 main channels of watershed • Cache & Bayou DeView

  3. Cache River • 95% of watershed in NE AR • Impairment turbidity, total dissolved solids, and lead. • Agriculture activities the major source • Upper Cache highly channelized • Lower Cache not channelized • Except for last 7 miles • Forms Big Woods connected to White River bottomland hardwood forests arkansaswater.org

  4. RamsarConvention on Wetlands • Intergovernmental treaty • Wetlands of International Importance • Commitment to maintain • Ecological character • Sustainable use of all wetlands in their territories

  5. Wetland of International Importance • 1989 • Ramsar site 442

  6. Sampling sites 1 • Site 1 – upstream of target subwatersheds • Sites 2-6 – Bayou De View subwatersheds • Site 7 – Cache River main channel 3 2 4 5 6 7

  7. Measured Parameters • pH • Dissolved Oxygen • Total Suspended Solids (TSS) • Turbidity • Dissolved Nitrate, Nitrite, Orthophosphate • Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus

  8. Site 1Upper Cache River 1

  9. 3.83 1.94 1.65 2.12 1.53 1.81 Site 1 2.16

  10. Site 2 Morrison Lake 2

  11. 1.62 2.22 1.72 Site 2

  12. Site 3 Buffalo Creek 3

  13. 3.71 1.88 2.23 Site 3 3 3

  14. Site 4 Caney Creek 4

  15. 1.64 2.26 1.74 Site 4 4 4 896 505

  16. Site 5 Turkey Creek 5

  17. Site 5 5

  18. Site 6 Channey Slough 6

  19. 1.96 Site 6 6 6

  20. Site 7 Cache River 7

  21. Site 7 7

  22. Preliminary results • Nutrient spikes following applications and rainfall events • Sediment and nutrients tend to decrease at downstream sites • Cache and Bayou De View channels • Benefit from wetlands and natural meanders • Established wetlands should reduce nutrient and sediment loading • Data from drought year (2012) and wet year (2013) difficult to interpret

  23. Questions? Thanks to ANRC, Carlos Rosado-Berrios, students and technicians at Ecotox

More Related