1 / 36

Comparative survey on non linear filtering methods : the quantization and the particle filtering approaches Afef SELLAMI

Comparative survey on non linear filtering methods : the quantization and the particle filtering approaches Afef SELLAMI. Chang Young Kim. Overview. Introduction Bayes filters Quantization based filters Zero order scheme First order schemes Particle filters Sequential importance

ulfah
Télécharger la présentation

Comparative survey on non linear filtering methods : the quantization and the particle filtering approaches Afef SELLAMI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Comparative survey on non linear filtering methods : thequantization and the particle filtering approachesAfef SELLAMI Chang Young Kim

  2. Overview • Introduction • Bayes filters • Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • Particle filters • Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) filter • Comparison of two approaches • Summary

  3. Non linear filter estimators • Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • Particle filtering algorithms: • Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) filter

  4. Overview • Introduction • Bayes filters • Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • Particle filters • Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) filter • Comparison of two approaches • Summary

  5. Bayes Filter • Bayesian approach: We attempt to construct the πnfof the state given all measurements. • Prediction • Correction

  6. Bayes Filter • One step transition bayes filter equation • By introducint the operaters , sequential definition of the unnormalized filter πn • Forward Expression

  7. Overview • Introduction • Bayes filters • Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • Particle filters • Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) filter • Comparison of two approaches • Summary

  8. Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • One step recursive first order scheme • Two step recursive first order scheme

  9. Zero order scheme • Quantization • Sequential definition of the unnormalized filter πn • Forward Expression

  10. Zero order scheme

  11. Recalling Taylor Series • Let's call our point  x0 and let's define a new variable that simply measures how far we are from x0 ; call the variable h = x –x0. • Taylor Series formula • First Order Approximation:  

  12. First order schemes • Introduce first order schemes to improve the convergence rate of the zero order schemes. • Rewriting the sequential definition by mimicking some first order Taylor expansion: • Two schemes based on the different approximation by • One step recursive scheme based on a recursive definition of the differential term estimator. • Two step recursive scheme based on an integration by part transformation of conditional expectation derivative.

  13. One step recursive scheme • The recursive definition of the differential term estimator • Forward Expression

  14. Two step recursive scheme • An integration by part formula where where

  15. Comparisons of convergence rate • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • One step recursive first order scheme • Two step recursive first order scheme

  16. Overview • Introduction • Bayes filters • Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • Particle filters • Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) filter • Comparison of two approaches • Summary

  17. Particle filtering • Consists of two basic elements: • Monte Carlo integration • Importance sampling

  18. p ( x ) ` wl = q ( x ) ` Importance sampling Proposal distribution: easy to sample from Original distribution: hard to sample from, easy to evaluate Importance weights

  19. Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • we want samples from • and make the following importance sampling identifications Proposal distribution Distribution from which we want to sample

  20. draw xit-1from Bel(xt-1) draw xitfrom p(xt | xit-1) Importance factor for xit: SIS Filter Algorithm

  21. Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) Problems of SIS: • Weight Degeneration Solution  RESAMPLING • Resampling eliminates samples with low importance weights and multiply samples with high importance weights • Replicate particles when the effective number of particles is below a threshold

  22. Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) Prediction Resampling Update Sensor model x

  23. Overview • Introduction • Bayes filters • Quantization based filters • Zero order scheme • First order schemes • Particle filters • Sequential importance sampling (SIS) filter • Sampling-Importance Resampling(SIR) filter • Comparison of two approaches • Summary

  24. Elements for a comparison • Complexity • Numerical performances in three state models: • Kalman filter (KF) • Canonical stochastic volatility model (SVM) • Explicit non linear filter

  25. Complexity comparison

  26. Numerical performances • Three models chosen to make up the benchmark. • Kalman filter (KF) • Canonical stochastic volatility model (SVM) • Explicit non linear filter

  27. Kalman filter (KF) • Both signal and observation equations are linear with Gaussian independent noises. • Gaussian process which parameters (the two first moments) can be computed sequentially by a deterministic algorithm (KF)

  28. Canonical stochastic volatility model (SVM) • The time discretization of a continuous diffusion model. • State Model

  29. Explicit non linear filter • A non linear non Gaussian state equation • Serial Gaussian distributions SG() • State Model

  30. Numerical performance Results • Convergence tests • three test functions: • Kalman filter: d=1

  31. Numerical performance Results : Convergence rate improvement • Kalman filter: d=3 <Regression slopes on the log-log scale representation (d=3)>

  32. Numerical performance Results • Stochastic volatility model • <Particle filter for large particle sizes (N = 10000) and quantization filter approximations for SVM as a function of the quantizer size>

  33. Numerical performance Results • Non linear explicit filter • <Explicit filter estimators as function of grid sizes >

  34. Conclusions • Particle methods do not suffer from dimension dependency when considering their theoretical convergence rate, whereas quantization based methods do depend on the dimension of the state space. • Considering the theoretical convergence results, quantization methods are still competitive till dimension 2 for zero order schemes and till dimension 4 for first order ones. • Quantization methods need smaller grid sizes than Monte Carlo methods to attain convergence regions

More Related