1 / 9

Naïve Physics and Mental Models

Naïve Physics and Mental Models. Reasoning about devices. Causal Models. Causal models Vosniadou & Brewer Contain causal information Go beyond what we learn May have flaws. Qualitative reasoning. People generally do not reason about quantities

verdad
Télécharger la présentation

Naïve Physics and Mental Models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Naïve Physics and Mental Models

  2. Reasoning about devices

  3. Causal Models • Causal models • Vosniadou & Brewer • Contain causal information • Go beyond what we learn • May have flaws

  4. Qualitative reasoning • People generally do not reason about quantities • Precise distances or specific relations among quanitities • We reason qualitatively • If one quantity increases, another decreases • Boundary conditions • Water flow occurs when the level in one container is larger than the level in the other.

  5. Naïve physics • What would happen to a ball shot through this pipe? • People often respond by assuming curvilinear momentum • McCloskey and Proffitt • Even happens if they carry out an action.

  6. What would happen to a bomb dropped from this plane?

  7. Other areas of naïve physics • Reasoning about collisions • Piagetian Water Level Problem • Reasoning about movement • Importance of embodiment in judging distances • Visual information is not enough • Vestibular information needed for rotation

  8. Why do we err? • Our naïve physics matches our observations • The world has friction, and so there are unseen forces that act in opposition to seen forces • Our naïve physics is often accurate for things we can do with our bodies • Only when we create larger machines do the differences become important. • Should not be a surprise • Newtonian physics is only a few hundred years old • Aristotelian mechanics is closer to our daily experience

More Related