1 / 9

Social Policy

Social Policy. Social insurance = largest part of welfare state Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment, Worker’s compensation Benefits working middle class; payroll tax contributions; “deserving ”; indexed Public assistance Food stamps, housing, child welfare

viho
Télécharger la présentation

Social Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Policy • Social insurance = largest part of welfare state • Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment, Worker’s compensation • Benefits working middle class; payroll tax contributions; “deserving”; indexed • Public assistance • Food stamps, housing, child welfare • Selective and means-tested; not indexed; controversial • Education • Private welfare state = relatively large • Health insurance, pensions from employer • Government-subsidized through tax code, exemptions • More inequitable than public programs • Spending on social insurance, public assistance, and state-subsidized private welfare expanded dramatically since WWII • Still comparatively small (Figure 10.1) • Americans enjoy fewer social rights (e.g., right to health care)

  2. Historical Welfare State • Early American welfare state= extended social protection to veteran soldiers and mothers (following Civil War) • (1880-1910) ¼ of federal budget spent on pensions for Civil War veterans and dependents • Progessive Era “maternalist” welfare state developed to promote motherhood • Income assistance to single, poor mothers who proved “worthiness”; contingent on behavior • Conform to traditional gender roles (i.e., full-time child-centered domesticity) • Unwed mothers often excluded • Many states, localities excluded black mothers (especially in South) • Gender and race roles inscribed in social policy

  3. New Deal and Beyond • Expansionof welfare state • Unemployment, poverty, despair  political action  federally funded jobs and social welfare • Reform resisted by corporate community • Social Security Act (1935) • Pensions, unemployment compensation for workers; public assistance to elderly, blind; for poor, single mothers -- Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) • Reinforced conservative nature of welfare state • Localism (states set benefit levels, eligibility requirements) • Benefits set low • Distinction between “deserving” and “undeserving” = social assistance programs (payroll taxes) vs. public assistance programs (general fund) • Gender inequalities (men more likely to qualify for social insurance) • Racial content (advantaged whites, excluded African Americans); clear example, GI Bill • Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) established minimum wage and 40 hour work week

  4. New Deal and Beyond, cont. • WWII halted social reform; business community, conservative Congress resisted new initiatives • (1946) Full employment, (1949) National Health Insurance, Truman’s Fair Deal (extending New Deal) all defeated • Unions, liberals used collective bargaining to gain pensions, health insurance, unemployment protection  private welfare system • Employer-based benefits= workers dependent for social protection (health insurance, pensions) on firms; tied workers to employers • Divided workers from each other = workers in corporate sector had less stake in improving, expanding programs for other workers, poor • Businesses offered tax incentives to subsidize employer-based welfare • Limited public benefits encouraged reliance on private, corporate welfare plans • Private plans act as brake on extension of public welfare state

  5. New Poverty • Increasing numbers living in poverty (1960s) • African Americans in urban ghettos • Greater discrimination than earlier groups of immigrants • Postindustrial economy  increasing importance of education, skills; factories relocated to suburbs; service sector jobs don’t pay living wage • Women • (present) 1/3 of all female-headed households in poverty; ½ of all families in poverty • Women earn lower wages; some need to stay home to care for children • Children • (present) poverty rate among children around 20%; 3x’s higher than in Europe • Welfare state generationally skewed (most benefits flow to elderly through expensive programs: Medicare and Social Security) • Poverty today • Good and bad jobs growing at expense of blue collar jobs in middle • Service sector = low wages, no benefits, irregular employment • Value of federal minimum wage declined (Table 10.1) • See page 331, Responsibility for Poverty: What Do You Think?

  6. Great Society Program • Johnson declared War on Poverty (Great Society = free of hunger and privation) • Health insurance (Medicare, Medicaid) for aged, poor; education for disadvantaged (Head Start, Upward Bound); Job-training (Job Corps); Housing and urban development (Model Cities) • Goal = enhance opportunities for poor • Undermined by social unrest, war in Vietnam • Conservatives = War on Poverty failed, harmful • Great Society polarized electorate along social insurance/public assistance and race lines • Politicians exploited tensions using “welfare” as code word to appeal to some voters’ fears over crime, taxes, morality, and race (peaked during Reagan administration) • War on Poverty successes • Reduced poverty from 19% (1964) to 12% (1979) • Reduced malnutrition, increased access to medical care, improved housing, expanded education

  7. Reagan to Clinton • Reagan reduced size, scope of welfare state • Slowed spending; slashed Great Society • Left social insurance intact • Put welfare state on defensive • Problem of poverty = increasing poor’s resources  changing the poor’s behavior; blaming circumstances on inadequacies of economy  perverse incentives of welfare state • Clinton • Abandoned campaign promise to invest in domestic programs • Supported welfare “reform” with Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) (1996) • Replaced AFDC with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) • States got fixed sums in form of block grants; Two year limits; lifetime limit of 5 years • Welfare rolls declined with resurgent economy (1993); grew in wake of Great Recession (2008)

  8. Bush to Obama • Expanded federal role in public education • No Child Left Behind (NCLB) (2002); sought to narrow gap between advantaged and disadvantaged; underfunded, controversial • Medicare Part D (2004); prescription drug coverage to Medicare recipients • Supported by pharmaceutical manufacturers (no price controls, price regulation, and negotiation to secure lower prices) • Increased spending on children’s health • State Children’s Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP) expanded federal Medicaid spending so states could provide health insurance to children whose families met income requirements • Healthbecame fastest growing area of welfare state; US top in expenditures on health (Figure 10.2) • Obama’s Affordable Health Care Act (AHCA) (2010) • Employers (> 50 workers) must provide affordable insurance; individuals required to have health insurance; state-based insurance marketplaces called exchanges; insurers unable to deny applicants, impose lifetime limits; improved medicare prescription drug benefit; children on parent’s policies until 26 • Hugely controversial; massive lobbying by pharmaceutical industry, health insurance companies; successfully blocked public option

  9. Conclusion • Conservative = stabilizes corporate capitalist system; alleviates but does not correct basic structural inequalities; reinforces market by making inequalities, insecurities tolerable • Egalitarian = offers more egalitarian alternative to market; can improve workers’ standards of living making them less dependent on wages, thus reducing power of employers; can spread to other activities, progressively infringing on areas operated on market principles and ability to pay • US welfare system exhibits both = extended protections to vulnerable groups, but in ways that reinforce divisions between workers and poor, whites and blacks, men and women • Question of poverty: economic growth alone cannot reduce poverty; only government programs in tandem with successful economy • Goals of welfare state(?): support private economy to increase economic growth; compensate for inequalities; provide security against hazards; enhance and equalize opportunities; reduce income and wealth gaps…what do you think?

More Related