1 / 32

Education for Sustainable Development in European Higher Education

European Seminar on Sustainable Development Minsk, 16-19 March , 2011. Education for Sustainable Development in European Higher Education. Jos H.A.N. Rikers (OUNL) Geert R. de Snoo (Leiden University) Rietje C.E. van Dam-Mieras (UNESCO Chair on ESD OUNL & Leiden University).

vinson
Télécharger la présentation

Education for Sustainable Development in European Higher Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. European Seminar on Sustainable Development Minsk, 16-19 March, 2011 Education for Sustainable Development in European Higher Education Jos H.A.N. Rikers (OUNL)Geert R. de Snoo (Leiden University) Rietje C.E. van Dam-Mieras(UNESCO Chair on ESD OUNL & Leiden University)

  2. EfSD in European Higher Education Presentation: • Regional context: 27 member states in EU • Main trends: European Higher Education Area 2 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  3. H.E. & SD in Europe - 1 • Regional context • Premise: need for paradigm shift • European policies and strategies • Lisbon • Bologna • Shortlist of ESD practices in EHEA 3 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  4. H.E. & SD in Europe - 2 • Main trends: Approaches in the European context • On Curricula and the learning process: • From EoSD to EfSD • Research • On the institutional level • Integrating SD in E: Learning for Sustainable Development • Copernicus Alliance • Social and community engagement • Regional Centers of Expertise • OPEDUCA project 4 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  5. Regional context - 1 Premise: One of the biggest challenges Human kind ever faced is to get Human behavior in line with the wish of continuous presence on Planet Earth. Since the Club of Rome report we have 40 years of experience that solutions within the existing framework do not exist. It is now time for a paradigm shift 5 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  6. Paradigm shift?? Globalization exceeds the traditional frames of reference societies have. Hence finding solutions needs new frameworks based on the diversity so significantly present in different cultures & economies around the globe. 6 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  7. Midterm Review: 2004 European Union and its Members States have clearly themselves contributed to slow progress by failing to act on much of the Lisbon strategy with sufficient urgency. This disappointing delivery is due to an overloaded agenda, poor coordination and conflicting priorities. Still, a key issue has been the lack of determined political action Regional context - 2 European policies and strategies Lisbon Strategy (March 2000 - 2010) To ensure the current EU wealth and to ensure growth through a competitive knowledge economy ? How to redefine wealth ? How to redefine growth ? Is a knowledge economy sustainable 7 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  8. Regional context - 3 European policies and strategies Bologna Process (Declaration June 1999) Harmonization of the European Higher Education policies and create an European Higher Education Area (EHEA) by 2010 So far the discussion was on instruments and not so much on paradigm shift and the role of universities as change agents (Anne Corbett, 2008, GUNI Report Higher Education in the World 4) 8 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  9. Regional context - 4 European policies and strategies: the role of universities How can universities become change agents? A search for practices might indicate the direction?! 9 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  10. Regional context - 5 Studies on innovative practices show: EEAC, 2005 • Governance is of strategic importance to make the shift. • Agenda 21 approach of capacity building, ownership & civil society engagement on all levels is not taken up in EU countries. 10 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  11. Regional context - 6 Inventory of innovative practices in ESD: EC, DG Education & Culture, 2008 • Different geographical levels • Different scales of implementation • Innovation in content • Innovation in delivery method • Innovation in forging new partnerships & networks • Innovation at the institutional level Let’s have a closer look at the trends…. 11 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  12. 12 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  13. Main trends • Curricula and the learning process • Research • Mainstreaming SD in Higher Education • Social & community engagement 13 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  14. Main trends - 1 On Curricula and the learning process From EoSD to EfSD United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2005): EfSD: An instrument for capacity building for individuals, groups, communities, organisations and countries to make judgements and choices in favour of Sustainable Development 14 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  15. Learning on SD Discipline based Fragmented Learning for SD Disciplinary Multi-disciplinary Trans disciplinary Local Regional Global From Education on SD to for SD Formal / Informal & Non-formal learning 15 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  16. Main trends - 2 Research From RoSD to RfSD 16 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  17. Research on SD Discipline based Fragmented Symptoms oriented Research for SD Disciplinary Multi-disciplinary Trans disciplinary Local Regional Global From Research on SD to for SD Complexity Societal context Discipline based Universities Knowledge generation 17 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  18. From Research on SD to for SD Research for SD is: • Comprehensive • Root level oriented • Systems approach • Future oriented 18 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  19. Main trends - 3 Integrating SD in Education Governance at institutional level 19 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  20. Integrating SD in Education - 1 Learning for sustainable development needs to be integrated in the whole H.E. system • on course level • curriculum level • institutional level • Institution – society interaction 20 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  21. Integrating SD in Education - 2 To assure SD integration include assessment criteria in: • Accreditation • QA cycle. Example: The AISHE instrument International exchange and collaboration to support this: • The Copernicus Alliance 21 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  22. The AISHE instrument - 1 AISHE Assessment Instrument for Sustainability in Higher Education (Dr. Niko Roorda c.s.) “The instrument covers all relevant issues related to the complexity faced in integrating sustainability in higher education” 22 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  23. The AISHE instrument - 2 23 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  24. The AISHE instrument - 3 24 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  25. Main trends - 4 Social and community engagement • Regional Centers of Expertise • OPEDUCA project 25 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  26. Social & community engagement – 1Regional Centers of Expertise on Education for Sustainable Development 26 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  27. Social & community engagement - 2 Regional Centers of Expertise • Four principles • Governance and management of the RCE • Transformative education • Research & development • Collaboration In Europe 26 Global 85 www.ias.unu.edu/research 27 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  28. Social & community engagement - 3 OPEDUCA project • The OPEDUCA concept is developed by a group of teachers, schools, universities, companies and experts • Combines formal and informal learning • Uses the “real world” as a learning environment 28 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  29. Conclusions • A firm basis in EU policies • A firm basis in HE engagement • Very diverse policies on national level • Sustainable Development is present in words, but no paradigm shift has taken place so far 29 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  30. Recommendations • European QA in HE mechanisms should be updated with SD criteria (e.g. AISHE model) • European universities should engage in a SD Annual report • H.E. institutions to engage in sustainable regional development (e.g. RCEs) • EU subsidy programs should stimulate EfSD initiatives • EU subsidy programs should stimulate European wide collaboration and networking (e.g. Copernicus Alliance) 30 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  31. Thank you for your attentionContact:jos.rikers@ou.nl 31 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

  32. 32 Jos H.A.N. Rikers Minsk March 2011

More Related