1 / 14

ERCOT PROGRESS REPORT

ERCOT PROGRESS REPORT. Board of Directors Austin, Texas October 15, 2002. Votes. Mediated Settlement with Frontera/APX Bylaws and Board Procedures Amendments Protocol Revisions (and Appeal) Budget Approval Foreign Corporate Guarantee. Updates . Frontera Settlement Retail Transactions

wesley-miles
Télécharger la présentation

ERCOT PROGRESS REPORT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERCOT PROGRESS REPORT Board of Directors Austin, Texas October 15, 2002

  2. Votes • Mediated Settlement with Frontera/APX • Bylaws and Board Procedures Amendments • Protocol Revisions (and Appeal) • Budget Approval • Foreign Corporate Guarantee

  3. Updates • Frontera Settlement • Retail Transactions • Other Activities • Retail Mechanics (Monte Jones) • Reliability and grid operations (Sam Jones)

  4. Frontera/APX • Protocols were not totally clear in certain situations -- as a result: • Frontera expected to be paid as bid (OOMC) • Even though there was no “market solution” • ERCOT contends that protocol’s intent was to cover variable costs plus a premium (10%) • Frontera requested ADR to resolve issues

  5. Frontera/APX (Cont’d) • Unique circumstances existed: • ERCOT’s reliability needs (OOMC) were the primary reason for starting up the plant (92% of the time) over five months • Third party revenues were derived from ERCOT’s commitments, not the reverse • The plant had economic value to the merchant market, beyond ERCOT’s needs

  6. Frontera/APX (Cont’d) • Based on these factors, ERCOT offered an alternative approach: • Variable costs would be paid by ERCOT • Third party revenues would be shared in the same proportion as the ratio of variable to total costs • No fixed costs or premium would be allowed • Frontera would retain 100% of OOME payments

  7. Frontera/APX (Cont’d) • A settlement agreement is proposed: • That is fair to Frontera and to the ERCOT market • That covers six months of (past) operations, and • That identifies the need for future protocol changes that reflect these unique circumstances • Thereby establishing a context for future market discussions regarding reliability service

  8. Retail Transactions • Total transactions now exceed 2.5 million • Sample data indicate that success rate is improving rapidly • 814 transactions were within protocols >95% of the time • 867 transactions were even better • ETS will enable 100% sample evaluation

  9. Transactions

  10. Other Activities • Taylor dedication scheduled to coincide with November Board meeting • January Board meeting will be a retreat • ISO CEOs to meet in Austin on October 24th and 25th • Disaster Recovery project proceeding well

  11. Disaster Recovery Goals • Provide continued transaction processing in the event of site disaster • Ensure “high availability” of critical applications in event of system failure • Allow for data (disk storage) capacity growth • Isolate application development and testing

  12. 2002 2003 Disaster Recovery Milestones 8-02 12-02 4-03 9-02 10-02 11-02 1-03 2-03 3-03 5-03 6-03 7-03 Order/Install EMC#2 Equipment Migrate – Blue Building to Taylor Data Center Select Fiber Type & Vendor Negotiate Network Terms & Conditions Order Network Implement Network Identify New / Upgrade Servers Purchase & Install Servers Relocate EMC#1 From Taylor To Met Center Disaster Recovery Taylor to Austin Go-Live

  13. Grid Operations and Reliability • Seven RMR contracts signed with AEP • Congestion reductions via new or improved transmission will reduce RMR demands • None of Reliant’s tendered plants are needed through 12/31/02 • Additional RMR discussions are pending

  14. Conclusions • Steady progress continues • Feld Group continues to match current staff capabilities with expanding requirements • Generation and transmission planning are receiving increased emphasis in order to maintain reliability in an increasingly dynamic market

More Related