1 / 42

Risk factors for inhibitor development: any clinical role?

This article explores the risk factors for developing inhibitors in hemophilia patients receiving factor VIII treatment and discusses the clinical implications. It also examines the limitations of current knowledge and highlights areas for future research.

westover
Télécharger la présentation

Risk factors for inhibitor development: any clinical role?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Risk factors for inhibitor development:any clinical role? Alfonso Iorio McMaster University Canada

  2. Disclosures for Alfonso Iorio, MD

  3. Program What we do know What we don’t know Where do we go from here

  4. What we do know • About 1/3of PUPs develop some form of inhibitory response • Extreme variability and inconsistency of results • Subclinical antibodies responsible for variation in half-life? • About ¾ of inhibitors disappears at some point • ITI? • QoL of patients with persistent inhibitors is reduced

  5. Coppola A et al. Haemophilia,16 Suppl1:13–9.

  6. Multicausality principle1 Previous F8 exposure CTL-4 polymorphism FVIII genotype (missense/point) IL10, TNF-a polymorphism FVIII genotype (deletions/inversions) F8 Dangersignal F8 Dangersignal treatment F8 1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S.Am J Public Health. 2005;95:S144–50. Modified from GouwS. SeminThrombHemost2007;35:723–34.

  7. SR: gene-related inhibitor risk Gouw S et al. Blood2012;119(12):2922–2934.

  8. Risk PREDICTION MODELS

  9. Alternate view on the problem Why 2/3 patients DO NOT develop inhibitory antibodies toward a complex and highly immunogenic protein they were not exposed to before?

  10. Gouw, S.C.. Blood, 2013, 121, 4046–55.

  11. 19 subjects dosed 3 low titer (15.8%) FVIII inhibitors (≥ 0.6 and ≤ 5 BU/ml) 5 high titer (26.3%) FVIII inhibitors (> 5 BU/ml) 8 subjects (42.1%) with confirmed FVIII inhibitor 9 subjects with suspected FVIII inhibitor 1not confirmed FVIII inhibitor • Inhibitor incidence per protocol • Courtesy of Guenter Auesrwald: ASH, New Orleans, 2013.

  12. Adjusted Relative Risk of Inhibitor Development, According to the Type of Factor VIII Product Gouw SC et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:231-239.

  13. Proportion of recombinant FVIII used in UK PUPs by year Collins et al, Blood 2014

  14. UKHCDO cohort: effect of time and … RODIN? Kogenate Advate RODIN = Dashed Not RODIN = Solid RODIN vs not RODIN P = 0.08

  15. Data from the EUHASS annual reports to the Investigators

  16. Data from the EUHASS annual reports to the Investigators

  17. FVIII concentrates • rFVIII: E (121 patients) • Advate (Baxter Bioscence) • 3rd generation concentrate (full length) • CHO • Marketing authorization: March 2, 2004 • pdFVIII: G (99 patients) • - Factane (LFB) • - Ion exchange chromatography (SA: FVIII: 100 IU/mg) • VWF content: 20-40 IU/100 IU FVIII • Marketing authorization: January 16, 2001 Goudemand, Oral communication, ISTH Toronto 2015

  18. Results: Outcomes according to thefirst FVIII product received Goudemand, Oral communication, ISTH Toronto 2015

  19. Results: inhibitor risk according to the FVIII product (primary analysis) Goudemand, Oral communication, ISTH Toronto 2015

  20. FranceCoag RODIN UKHCDO 303 436 88 50 321 51 721 IPDMA - EUHANET

  21. Lesson learnt • 1/3 patients exposed develop an inhibitor • this is not a “rare” adverse event • The RR/HR for the few predictors identified do not explain a significant proportion of the variability, and mostly point to “circumstances” of factor VIII presentation • PUPs can be accrued fast enough and are very countable, yet needed sample size is huge

  22. Lesson learnt • 1/3 patients exposed develop an inhibitor • this is not a “rare” adverse event • The RR/HR for the few predictors identified do not explain a significant proportion of the variability, and mostly point to “circumstances” of factor VIII presentation • PUPs can be accrued fast enough and are very countable, yet needed sample size is huge

  23. Evidence suggesting RCTs are superior to observational studies

  24. The randomized trial design - hemophilia 1 4 3 2

  25. Tolerogenic interventions

  26. Treatment with kynurenine prevents anti-FVIII antibody development Kynurenine/vehicle

  27. IDO1 induction through CpG ODN prevents inhibitor development in hemophilic mice

  28. Inhibitor rates in PTPs • 1.7 (95% CI 1.3 – 1.7) * 1000 pts y (43/4323) • 3.0 (95% CI 1–4) per 1000 patients-years (25 studies providing data on follow-up) • Xi M et al. J ThrombHaemost2013;11:1655–62. • HA: 1.5 (CI 1 – 2.2)* 1000 pts y (26/17,667) • HB: 0.4 (CI 0 – 2.0) * 1000 pts y (1/2836) • Fischer Ket al. ThrombHaemost2015;113:968–75.

  29. 0/29 • 1/25 • 1/30 • Xi, M et al. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis : JTH, 2013; 11(9), 1655–62.

  30. Inhibitor rates, selected recombinant FVIII • * 0.26 (0.16 - 0.44) at fixed effect model • Xi, M et al. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis : JTH, 2013; 11(9), 1655–62.

  31. Results: case retrieved • Literature: • 29/43 cases • 19 publications • Source population: • 4443 • EUHASS / CHESS • 27/45 cases • 19 centers • Source population: • 31551 patient years => 7887 patients

  32. Conclusions – PTP study • More than half of the inhibitors was cleared, either spontaneously or with ITI • More than half was low responder • Two only were refractory to ITI • 1 in 4 had surgery and/or intense treatment in the previous 2 months.

  33. Immune Tolerance Treatment

  34. Inhibitor clearance Tagariello G, et al J HematolOncol 2013;6:63. CaramC, et al. ThrombHaemost 2011;105:59–65.

  35. Conclusion • Over the last 30 year the data collection capacity has enormously increased • However, a purely observational approach has not produced any actionable evidence • We need to climb up one step in our capacity to produce trustable comparative data

  36. Thank you Slides available for download at: http://hemophilia.mcmaster.ca

More Related