1 / 13

Don Medley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California Thursday, June 25, 2009

The Politics of Science. Don Medley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California Thursday, June 25, 2009. The Superconducting Supercollider A Cautionary Tale.

wilbur
Télécharger la présentation

Don Medley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California Thursday, June 25, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Politics of Science Don Medley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California Thursday, June 25, 2009

  2. The Superconducting Supercollider A Cautionary Tale The Superconducting Super Collider (SSC), planned to be built mostly in Waxahachie, Texas, would have been the world's largest and highest-energy particle accelerator complex. Its planned ring circumference is 87.1 km (54 miles) with an energy of 20 TeV per beam, potentially enough energy to create a Higgs boson, a particle predicted by the Standard Model but not yet detected.

  3. The ScSC: Death of High Energy Physics Leadership in the United States “Ultimately, in 1990, President George Bush (a Texas resident) decided the Texas bid was the most acceptable one. Perceptions were that politics drove the decision more than scientific excellence although at this level, such qualitative distinctions involve often very fine lines. Despite some mutterings, the project was funded initially by Congress. Fairly quickly in the program's life, however, the project came under fire especially as construction costs continued to escalate with projected total costs rising from $4.4 billion in 1987 to $8.25 billion in 1991 to $11 billion in 1993. From a congressional perspective, the space station and ScSC came together as two high-tech projects operating with out of control budgets. The explanations provided by ScSC supporters proved unconvincing in part because the science suggested as so critical had little grounding in reality as understood by laypersons (who were no longer willing to automatically accept the professionals' judgments. As the budget vise grew tighter upon discretionary spending, the ScSC became even more controversial. In 1992, the House struck down the ScSC but the Senate prevailed in conference. Later, in 1993, the House again moved to strike funding for the ScSC, providing only shut down funding. The Senate resisted but ultimately gave up; given the intransigent nature of the House's resistance to program continuation, further resistance was futile.” Congress, constituency, and jobs: the Superconducting Super Collider, the Space Station, and National Science Policy*1 R. Handberg, Department of Political Science, Center for Space Policy and Law, University of Central Florida, HFA 414, Orlando, FL 32816-1356, USA

  4. All that now remains are 200,000 square feet of still-vacant factories and labs, and over 30 km of carved-rock tunnels slowly filling with water.

  5. A Renaissance for Science Funding?

  6. Yes, it started with the Bush Administration…. Fact Sheet: The American Competitiveness Initiative: Encouraging Innovation President Discusses American Competitiveness InitiativeAmerican Competitiveness Initiative Today, President Bush Discussed His American Competitiveness Initiative (ACI) – A Comprehensive Strategy To Keep Our Nation The Most Innovative In The World. As the President outlined in his State of the Union Address, the ACI commits $5.9 billion in FY 2007 and more than $136 billion over 10 years to increase investments in research and development (R&D), strengthen education, and encourage entrepreneurship and innovation.

  7. But, the Obama Administration is placing an even greater emphasis on science.. Not just on funding, but also on using science to guide policy decisions. • Steve Chu, Secretary of Energy, Nobel Laureate • Steve Koonin, Under Secretary for Science, DOE, former Caltech Provost • John Holdren, Science Advisor to the President, Former Harvard Professor • Harold Varmus, Co-Chair, PCAST, Nobel Laureate and PresidentMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

  8. More importantly – stepping up to the plate with funding “requests.” FY2010 Budget Request Invests in the Sciences. Investments in science and technology foster economic growth; create millions of high-tech, high-wage jobs that allow American workers to lead the global economy; improve the quality of life for all Americans; and strengthen our national security. The recovery Act included a $5 billion investment in key science programs, which is by itself an almost 50-percent increase for these programs over 2008 and represents a significant down-payment toward the President’s plan to double the funding for these agencies over 10 years. Under the President’s doubling plan, the Budget provides a16-percent increase over 2008 funding levels for the National Science Foundation and similarly large increases for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science and the Department of Commerce’s National Institute of Standards and Technology.

  9. Appropriations Process Timeline 2007 Continuing Resolution President transmits budget to Congress 2008 Omnibus Appropriations Legislation Drafted House and Senate Conference Legislation ------- Final Passage Bills Passed by House and by Senate Appropriations Budget Hearings Committees “Mark Up” Legislation August Recess Continuing Resolution?? Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 9/30 End of Fiscal Year House Appropriations Reports out Energy and Water Development Appropriations FY2005 Omnibus Signed into Law Senate Appropriations Reports out Energy and Water Development Appropriations

  10. 3 Simple Truths • Members of Congress and their staff thrive on and appreciate information • Members of Congress are always looking for things to do – oblige them • If you don’t go to DC you should know that everyone else is already there

  11. Members of Congress and their staff thrive on information • Staff have long lists of issue area responsibilities – you can make their jobs easier • Keep it simple and understandable to the lay person – 8th to 10th grade level is recommended • Whenever possible, link information to the Member’s district or state – you’ll get their attention quicker and hold it longer

  12. Members of Congress are always looking for things to do – oblige them • Members of Congress are usually ready and willing to write letters or have their staff make phone calls regarding programs and projects – very typical type of congressional action • Congressional Record statements for anniversaries, major milestones, retirements, etc. • Assistance on appropriations

  13. If you don’t go to DC you should know that everyone else is already there • Face time is important – phone calls and emails as follow up • Humility and empathy are critical – Members and staff are important and busy, understand this and let them know that you do • Effusive appreciation is absolutely required “The squeaky wheel gets the grease,”statement by Congressman Zack Wamp of Tennessee.

More Related