1 / 68

L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli

L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli. Results of B A B AR experiment on CP violation and B physics. Outline. Experimental set-up Charmonium decays B lifetime measurement Mixing and CP asymmetry Rare B decays Future perspective and Conclusions. (4S).

yaron
Télécharger la présentation

L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. L.ListaINFN Sezione di Napoli Results of BABAR experiment on CP violation and B physics Luca Lista

  2. Outline • Experimental set-up • Charmonium decays • B lifetime measurement • Mixing and CP asymmetry • Rare B decays • Future perspective and Conclusions (4S) Luca Lista

  3. center of mass energy  MU(4S) =10.58 GeV/c2 bg= 0.56 at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (California) Low Energy Ring [e+, 3.1GeV] BaBar High Energy Ring [e-, 9.0GeV] Has delivered 23.7 fb-1 from Oct. 99 to Nov.2000 The PEP-II B-Factory Luca Lista

  4. Performance during the 99-00 run Luca Lista

  5. Electromagnetic Calorimeter 6580 CsI(Tl) crystals 1.5T solenoid e+ DIRC (PID) 144 quartz bars 11000 PMTs Drift Chamber 40 axial stereo layers e- Instrumented Flux Return 19 iron / 18-19 RPC layers Silicon Vertex Tracker 5 layers, 2-sided Si strips The BaBar detector Luca Lista

  6. The Silicon Vertex Tracker Beam bending magnets high radiation area Beam pipe layer 1,2 layer 3 layer 4 layer 5 • 5 layers: 20o< <150o; • R= 3.2, 4, 5.4, 9.1-12.7, 11.4-14.4 cm • Single hit resolution: 10-15 mm Luca Lista

  7. The Drift Chamber (pT)/pT= 0.13%  pT 0.45% • 40 axial and stereo layers for Z measurement • small hexagonal cells (11.9 x 19.0 mm) • 80%:20% helium:isobutane Luca Lista

  8. The Cherenkov detector (DIRC) • Internally reflected Cherenkov radiation • ~11000 phototubes Luca Lista

  9. The Electromagnetic Calorimeter • Identification of e±,g,p0 • Energy resolution: Luca Lista

  10. The Instrumented Flux Return Muon and KL reconstruction 18/19 RPC planes ~53000 electronic channels Luca Lista

  11. B-counting • The determination of B decays branching ratios requires a precise estimate of the number of produced (4S)BB events • Counting of Multi-Hadron events • Correction factor:  = 0.99620.0027 • Different efficiencies for mm and MH on and off-resonance • 22,700,000 BB events,1.7% sys. error Luca Lista

  12. b c Efficiency J/, (2S), c c W- B0, B- s, d X d, u Efficiency muons pions Inclusive Charmonium Decays • J/, (2S) and c are reconstructed in final states containing leptons • Different selection purity for different decays Luca Lista

  13. Inclusive J/ decays p*J/ < 2 GeV/c • Inclusive branching ratio: Br(BJ/X) = (1.0440.013 0.028)10-2 Br(BJ/X dir.) = (0.7890.010 0.034)10-2 • p*: J/ momentum distribution in the (4S) system • B system coincides with (4S) within 250 MeV J/ e+e- J/ +- Luca Lista

  14. J/ momentum spectrum BB events continuum Luca Lista

  15. J/ production in continuum • First observation of J/ production in continuum • BB events rejected by p*>2 GeV/c • Rejection of Initial State Radiation • Ntracks, Etot, R2 Angular distribution1+A cos2q* • A (all E*) = 0.250.19 • A (p*>3.5 GeV) l= 0.620.39 • Color singles prediction: A  –0.8,   0.8 pb • NRQCD (c.o.) prediction: 0.6<A<1.0,   2.8 pb Luca Lista

  16. Inclusive (2S) decays Br( B (2S) X ) = (0.2750.020 0.029) 10-2 (2S) l+l-, J/+- p* < 1.6 GeV/c • (2S)  l+l- branching ratio measurement • Assuming PDG values for (2S)J/+-: Luca Lista

  17. Inclusive c decays • Br(B c1 X) = ( 0.378  0.034  0.026 )  10-2 • Br(B c1 X dir.) = ( 0.353  0.034  0.024 )  10-2 • Br(B c2 X) < 0.2110-2 @ 90% C.L.= ( 0.137  0.058  0.012 )  10-2 c2 (?) c2 (?) Luca Lista

  18. Exclusive B decays • Motivation: • Several channels are used to constrain the unitarity triangle • Charged modes may exhibit direct CP asymmetry • Probe of non perturbative QCD • Theoretical prediction available for many decays in the factorization hypothesis • Kinematics selection: • Energy substituted mass • Independent on particle mass hypotheses • Energy difference in the center of mass Luca Lista

  19. Golden CP mode: BJ/K0S Luca Lista

  20. BJ/K0L • KL reconstructed as neutral deposit in the I.F.R. or E.M. Calorimeter • 1.4 < p*J/ < 2.0 GeV/c • No KL momentum measurement • DE is determined assuming the mBmass constraint Luca Lista

  21. Selected rare channels First observation: B0C1 K*0 B0J/ 0 Luca Lista

  22. Branching ratios results Luca Lista

  23. BaBar compared to PDG 2000 Luca Lista

  24. +1.9 ( 5.0  0.1 ) % -1.7 J/+ / J/K+ • Cabibbo and color suppressed tree diagram • possible CP asymmetry from penguin contribution • Unbinned maximum likelihood fit based on kinematical variables: Br(B+J/+)/Br(B+J/K +) =(3.910.78 0.19)10-2 ( 5.2  2.4 ) % ( 5.1  1.4 ) % Luca Lista

  25. Z e-e+ 9 GeV 3.1GeV Dz bg= 0.56 gbctB@260mm B± and B0/B0 lifetimes • One B is fully reconstructed • in a B0 or B mode • Measure both B vertices • Fit for Dt @ Dz/c gBU bgUlab • ideally PDF(Dt)  exp(-|Dt|/tB) • Novel method for • asymmetric e+e- machines • Different systematics from • previous measurements • Detailed understanding of • resolution function needed B1 partially reconstructed sz ~ 140mm B2 fully reconstructed sz~ 60-100 mm Luca Lista

  26. The 99-00 data sample 22.7 106 BB pairs recorded B0/B0 B B0  D(*)+  - D(*)+- D(*)+a1- J/K*0 B-  D(*)0  - J/K- (2S)K- 6967 ± 95 purity  90% 7266 ± 94 purity  93% Luca Lista

  27. Fitting procedure B0/B0 MC Resolution function fitted on data: R(Dt)=f*Gaus(s)+(1-f)*Gaus(s)Exp(k) identical for B±andB0/ B0 psig from mass distribution fit t residual/ t Unbinned maximum likelihood fit: Bkg description from side-band events Luca Lista

  28. B B0/B0 background Dt (ps) Dt (ps) preliminary Lifetime results t0 = 1.546  0.032(stat)  0.022(syst) ps t  = 1.673  0.032(stat)  0.022(syst) ps t0 /t = 1.082  0.026(stat)  0.011(syst) common resolution Luca Lista

  29. Other lifetime ratio measurements Luca Lista

  30. A=(,) B=(1,0) C=(0,0) The Unitarity Triangle • Unitarity relations on matrix elements lead to a triangle in the complex plane • Quark mixing is described by the CKM matrix    1 Luca Lista

  31. CP violation via mixing interference in bccs B0 J/yK0s B0 t d b B0 B0 W W t b d @Dt=0 B0 B0 F- F+ Dt(ps) CP violation at asymmetric B factory Integrated asymmetry = 0 time dependent analysis required • coherent production: • Y(4S)  BB •  clock starts at • 1st B decay Luca Lista

  32. J/K0S (p+p-) 425 ± 22 purity  94% J/K0S (p0p0) hCP = -1 (2S)K0S (p+p-) J/K0L hCP = +1 199 ± 23 purity  45% The 99-00 data sample: CP modes Luca Lista

  33. B01 partially reconstructed flavour tagged B02 fully reconstructed D*+  - or J/K0S e-e+ B1 = B0 B1 = B0 unmixed B0 B0 Dz mixed B0B0 or B0B0 Mixing and CP asymmetry of B0/B0 CP modes: FCP(Dt)  e-|Dt|/tB ( 1  hCP sin2b. sin Dmd Dt ) Flavour specific modes: Fflav(Dt)  e-|Dt|/tB ( 1  cos DmdDt ) Luca Lista

  34. leptons:b  l- , b  l+ • p*>1.0 GeV/c (e±), p*>1.1 GeV/c (m±) • e = 10.9  0.4% • kaons: b  K- , b  K+ • e = 36.5  0.7% Tagging the flavour of the B0CP/flav Look at the second B in the event • Neural network mainly to • recover unidentified leptons • and use soft pions from D* • NT1:e = 7.7  0.4% • NT2:e = 13.7  0.5% • Total e = 68.9  1.0% Luca Lista

  35. perfect tagging/ resolution imperfect tagging/ perfect resolution imperfect tagging/ imperfect resolution B0 B0 e-|Dt|/tB (1hCP sin2b  sin Dmd Dt) e-|Dt|/tB (1hCP Dsin2b sin Dmd Dt) e-|Dt|/tB (1hCP D sin2b  sin Dmd Dt)  R(Dt) unmixed mixed e-|Dt|/tB (1cos DmdDt) e-|Dt|/tB (1 D cos Dmd Dt) e-|Dt|/tB (1D cos DmdDt)  R(Dt) Imperfect tagging and resolution Luca Lista

  36. largest correlation withsin2b: 7.6% Fitting Procedure unbinned maximum likelihood fit: • Dmd : flavour specific sample • sin2b : flavour specific +CP samples Mainly constrained by high stat flavour sample Empirical description fitted on data Luca Lista

  37. Fraction of wrongly tagged events s(sin2b) 1/(Q) NT2 kaons NT1 leptons Flavour misid. measurement D = 1 - 2 w Check w with a time-integrated method (events with |Dt|<2.5 ps to optimise s(w)) On the same sample and on ~11000 D*ln Luca Lista

  38. Dmdmeasurement preliminary Dmd= 0.519 ±0.020stat±0.016systps-1 e-|Dt|/tB (1D cos DmdDt)  R(Dt) Luca Lista

  39. l+or l- e-e+ l+or l- N+–, –+ – N++, –– Asymmetry A(Dz)= N+ –, –+ + N++, –– Dz Dmdmeasurement: the di-lepton analysis Dmd= 0.499 ± 0.010 ± 0.012 ps-1 Luca Lista

  40. preliminary preliminary Luca Lista

  41. sin2b results sin2b=0.25±0.22stat sin2b=0.87±0.51stat sin2b = 0.34 ± 0.20stat ± 0.05syst Luca Lista

  42. Time dependent asymmetry hCP = -1 sin2b=0.25±0.22stat ln(L/Lmax) hCP = +1 sin2b sin2b=0.87±0.51stat combined result Luca Lista

  43. Cross-checks: sin2b on sub-samples sin2 sin2 Luca Lista

  44. sin2b systematic uncertainties Luca Lista

  45. World average for sin2b Luca Lista

  46. 1s 2s Unitarity triangle sin2b = 0.34 ± 0.20stat ± 0.05syst Luca Lista

  47. J/ K*0 angular analysis • L=0,1,2 waves • Both CP even and odd amplitudes are present • Measurement of sin2b is possible from angular analysis f (costr, cosK*, tr) = f1 |A0|2 + f2 |A|||2 + f3|A|2f4 Im(A||* A) + f5 Re (A0* A||) + f6 Im (A0* A) Channels withoutp0 Channels withp0 J/ rest frame K* decay plane |A|2 + |A|||2 + |A0|2 = 1 Luca Lista

  48. J/ K* angular analysis Indication of FSI (a) Raw measurement (b) Acceptance correction (c) “ “ + mES fit (d) “ “ + (Self) Feed Across Time dependent CP asymmetry dilution factor: D =1 – 2|A|2 = 0.680.10 Luca Lista

  49. B  D*D(*)K • Study of the bccs transition • Experimental inclusive estimate from from BDSX, (cc)X, CX, CX (ALEPH, CLEO) • Br(bccs) ~ 15.82.8 % • Theoretical calculation can’t determine this low value together with inclusive s.l. branching ratio (bcW) • Three-body B  DDK can contribute • Study of color suppressed modes (B+ D*+D*-K+) Color suppressed Color allowed Luca Lista

  50. B  D*D(*)K • Reconstructed decays: • D*+ D0p+ • D*0 D0p0 • D*0 D0g • D0 K-p+ • D0 K-p+p0 • D0 K-p+p-p+ • D+ K-p+p+ • Br(B0 D*+D0K+) = (0.280.070.05)10-2 • Br(B0 D*+D*0K+) = (0.680.170.17)10-2 • Br(B+ D*+D*-K+) = (0.340.160.11)10-2 • First observation of color suppressed mode other than B  (charmonium)X B0 (all modes) NS = 18021 B+ (all modes)NS = 11715 B+ D*+D*-K+ NS = 8.23.5 Luca Lista

More Related