1 / 23

Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia

Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia. Avian Euthanasia. Euthanasia and Depopulation. Euthanasia Transitioning painlessly and stress-free as possible Mass Depopulation Large numbers, quickly and efficiently Consideration to welfare as practicable Terms used interchangeably here.

yestin
Télécharger la présentation

Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mass Depopulation & Euthanasia Avian Euthanasia

  2. Euthanasia and Depopulation FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Euthanasia • Transitioning painlessly and stress-free as possible • Mass Depopulation • Large numbers, quickly and efficiently • Consideration to welfare as practicable • Terms used interchangeably here

  3. Euthanasia and Depopulation FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • May be practiced during an animal health emergency • Goals of Euthanasia • Provide humane treatment • Select acceptable method • Minimize negative emotional impact • Safeguard food chain • Prevent or mitigate disease spread

  4. Handling FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian Goal: Humane Treatment Decrease animal stress, excitement Competent, trained and experienced personnel Restrain without undueinjury or pain Handle animals quietly USDA APHIS and CFSPH

  5. Euthanasia Methods FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Acceptable (noninhalant) • Conditionally acceptable • Adjunct • “Other” • Consider disease agentwhen choosing method • Zoonotic potential

  6. NoninhalantInjectables FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Injectable barbituates • Barbituatederivates

  7. Inhalant FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Conditionally acceptable • Carbon dioxide • Carbon monoxide • Nitrogen • Argon

  8. Physical Methods FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Conditionally acceptable • Cervical dislocation • Decapitation • Electrocution • Gunshot • Percussive stunning/Captive bolt • Manually applied blunt force trauma

  9. Additional Methods FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Water-based foam • Ventilation shut down • Not recommended

  10. Adjunct Methods FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Potassium chloride or magnesium sulfate • IV or Intracardiac • Exsanguination (consider biosecurity) • Bird MUST be unconscious

  11. Injectable Chemical Agents FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Small numberof birds, companion birds • Intraperitoneal injection • Nonirritating euthanasia agent • Restrain with Ketamine hydrochloride, if necessary • Death is prolonged when compared to intravenous methods

  12. Types of Gaseous Agents FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • CO2– used extensively • Heavier than air, will remain near floor • Nitrogen, argon • Specific gravity similar to air • Does not sink • Must be used in a completely closed system

  13. Physical- Cervical Dislocation FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Should only be performed by well-trained individuals • Only practical if: • Small birds • Small number to be euthanized • Tissues collection • When learning technique, sedate or anesthetize birds first

  14. Physical- Decapitation FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Not recommended in mass depopulation situations • Risk of disease spread • Offensive • Stressful to birds and responders • Inefficient • Welfare concerns

  15. Physical- Percussive Stunning FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Cash Poultry Killer (CPK) • Chickens, turkeys, ducks, geese • Cartridge-powered • New cartridge for each use • May overheat with continuous use • Air-powered • Intended for production slaughter

  16. Physical- Electrocution FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Successfully used with poultry • Mobile electrical water bath systems • On-farm stunning, euthanasia • Sufficient to kill without need for adjunct method • Requires individual handling and leg-shackling necessary • No existing electrocution mass depopulation systems in the U.S.

  17. Physical- Gunshot FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Acceptable for small number of feral/wild birds that cannot be moved, trapped • Use appropriate shot size • Acceptable for large birds or ratites

  18. Ventilation Shutdown FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Cease ventilation of building • May also increase ambient temperature • Welfare concerns: • Method of death: suffocation or heat stress • Possible prolonged suffering • Method not addressed by AVMA • Approved in United Kingdom • Not recommended

  19. Water-Based Foam FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Advantages: • Decreased labor • Little/no bird handling • Decreases dust • Disadvantages: • Water supply • Birds must be on floor

  20. Confirmation of Death FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • Confirmation of death can be difficult • Sustained lack of heartbeat and respiration • Rigor mortis • Evaluate by competent, experienced personnel

  21. For More Information FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian • FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines& SOP: Mass Depopulationand Euthanasia (MDE) (2011) • http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/emergency_management/ • MDE web-based training module • http://naherc.sws.iastate.edu/

  22. Guidelines Content FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: MDE- Avian Authors (CFSPH): • ReneéDewell DVM,MS • Nichollette Rider, Veterinary Student Significant contributions to the content were provided by USDA APHIS VS: • Lori P. Miller, PE • Darrel K. Styles, DVM, PhD

  23. Acknowledgments Development of this presentation was by the Center for Food Security and Public Health at Iowa State University through funding from the USDA APHIS Veterinary Services PPT Authors: Dawn Bailey, BS; Kerry Leedom Larson, DVM, MPH, PhD, DACVPM Reviewers: Glenda Dvorak, DVM, MPH, DACVPM: Cheryl L. Eia, JD, DVM, MPH, Patricia Futoma, BS, Veterinary Student, ReneéDewell DVM,MS

More Related