1 / 24

Auxiliary Material Wilhelm Rall Konrad Stahl Case 3: Product Portfolio Choice in the Wine Industry

Auxiliary Material Wilhelm Rall Konrad Stahl Case 3: Product Portfolio Choice in the Wine Industry. Main purpose of the case. To learn about the industry To examine the complete portfolio restructuring of a winery including the complementary marketing strategy

yetta-oneill
Télécharger la présentation

Auxiliary Material Wilhelm Rall Konrad Stahl Case 3: Product Portfolio Choice in the Wine Industry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Auxiliary Material Wilhelm Rall Konrad Stahl Case 3: Product Portfolio Choice in the Wine Industry

  2. Main purpose of the case • To learn about the industry • To examine the complete portfolio restructuring of a winery including the complementary marketing strategy • In particular:To identify the depth (vs. breadth) strategy and competitive advantage over rivals • To determine whether the Tesch model is one to be imitated

  3. Industry structure • Five major wine growing areas in Germany: Moselle, Rhine, Franconia, Rheine-Hessia, Rheinland-Palatinate. • Rhineland Palatinate (containing 2/3) 2003: • 5,817 Estate wineries • 6,145 Sideline (moonshine) vintners • (Mainly) sideline vintners organized in co-operatives that absorb the crop to produce wine • Bottlers (negociants) ar not major players • 15 % of area cultivated serves co-operatives and negociants

  4. Firm size distribution • Industry consists of extremely small scaled wineries, by international standards • Average area cultivated by an estate winery, Rhineland-Palatinate: 3.2 ha (1979), 7.5 ha (2003) • Typical French winery has more than five fold the size

  5. Industry evolution • 19th century • German wine prices topped world prices • Until the late 80’s • Slow increase in wine land • Production of primarily sweet wines • Late 80’s + • Decline in wine land • Increasing share of dry wines produced. 1999: ¼ red, ¾ white, 2004: 1/3 red, 2/3 white • Rapid technological change: Absorption of international technology • Mid 90’s + • Increasing share of red wines produced • 2000 + • Outburst of reviews comparing wineries for the discriminating consumer (Typical example: Vinum Journal, Annual Gault-Millau WineGuide) • Enhances competition amongst premium producers • Slowly increasing export (< 1.5 %, almost 50 % to GB)

  6. Product description (1/2) • Product extremely varied • Very large number of varieties (horizontal differentiation): 10+ white, 5+ red • Development towards dry vs. medium dry vs. sweet wines • German wine law allows for vertical differentiation of wine developed from the very same grape: • Tafelwein, Q.b.A., Prädikatswein: Kabinett, Spätlese, Auslese, Beerenauslese, Trockenbeerenauslese • (the latter two variants almost always sweet) • (share of premium to QbA wines 2005: 15.5%) • Development of white and red wines in barrique

  7. Product description (2/2) • Especially in the Rhine valley: extreme variation in soil conditions (terroir) • Extreme horizontal and vertical differentiation in individual technique: • Personal style of wine growing: • cultivation of vineyards • Intensity of quantity reduction • Harvesting time • Personal style of development • idiosyncratic and commercial yeasts, • fermentation temperature, • length of fermentation, • filtration • (production of cuvées)

  8. Typical Firm (1/2) • Typical estate offers a large menue of varieties, and quality levels per variety. • Example (1): Weingut Bergdolt-St.Lamprecht, Duttweiler • Top producer of Pinot Blanc in Germany • Offers currently in its premium category • 9 Rieslings • 12 Pinot Blancs • 2 Chardonnays • 2 more whites from differing varieties • Amongst them 5 sweet • 3 Pinot Noirs • 4 more reds from differing varieties • 5 Cremants

  9. Typical Firm (2/2) • Example (2): Weingut Becker, Schweigen • Top producer of Pinot Noir in Germany • Offers currently • 8 Rieslings • 3 Pinot Blancs • 3 Pinot Gris • 2 Chardonnays • 2 Auxerrois • 1 Chardonnay • 1 Blanc de Noir • 1 Gewürztraminer • Amongst them 5 semi-dry • 6 Spätburgunder plus Several Reserve Barriques on Request • 2 more reds from differing varieties • 1 Cremant • A variety of estate produced spirits, in particular Marcs

  10. Industry – main features • Convergence towards a small mean firm size • Annual product cycle • Repeat sales to the same custom • Quick obsolescence from the point of view of producer (white wines older than two years are difficult to sell) • Time to market is crucial only when sold out varieties are to be replaced • imitation of technique is not very problematic, as style differences dominate • Vertical and horizontal differentiation • Switching costs

  11. Central Feature influencing Demand: Switching costs (one stop shopping) • Classical (and still typical) consumer • Selects a winery from an extreme variation of styles across wineries • Buys at the winery after a wine tasting • Selects a menu of varieties within the very same winery from which to choose for different meals and separate consumption • Stays loyally with one winery for many years • Modern consumer: • Selects winery on the basis of reviews to buy more selectively

  12. External analysis • Customers • Suppliers • Substitute products • Potential entrants - BTE • Established rivals

  13. Customers • Individuals • Rely on their tastes and/or on reviews • Quite important: Tasting based spontaneous purchases • Retailers and Gastronomy • Develop their own product line • Rely on reviews • Care about brand names • Exporters • Purchase primarily high end dry and sweet wines • Care about brand names • Are price sensitive

  14. France 56 litres Italy 51 l Switzerland 42 l Argentina 36 l Spain 30 l Germany 24 l Australia 21 l UK 20 l USA < 10 l Annual wine consumption per head (2003)

  15. Suppliers • Premium vs. Mass wine producers • Production costs: • Very much dependent on aspired quality • land cost/ha Germany between € 5.000 and € 10.000(Bordeaux, Napa Valley € 100.000) • Development cost/ha € 5.000 – 6.000 • Hectar yield between 2.000 and 20.000 litres • Vinification € .3 - .6 per .75 l bottlebarrique development muich more expensivenew barrique barrel € 600 • Bottling € .5 – 1.5 per .75 l bottle • Storage costs • Distribution costs

  16. Main Distribution Channels

  17. Substitutes • Beer: • Highly concentrated industry • Substantively less differentiated product, almost completely commodified • May be a close substitute to bulk wines, but not to premium wines • Spirits: • Highly concentrated industry for branded products • Highly dispersed industry for fruit and wine spirits • Some products (Marcs) served by the wine industry itself

  18. Barriers to Entry • By EU decree: limited availability of land • High capital cost • High skill needed • Production cost advantage unimportant

  19. External forces - summary • Wine is an extremely differentiated commodity • Consumers exhibit very idiosyncratic tastes • Premium wine purchase is governed by one-stop shopping phenomenon • High Barriers to Entry • Wine making industry is highly competitive in bulk wines, but not extremely competitive in premium wines. Premium producers secure healthy profits

  20. Tesch‘s Product Line • 84 % Riesling • 8% Pinot blanc • 8 % Pinot Noir • All Rieslings fermented to dryness • All premium • Particularly interesting marketing device: the Rieslings are labelled by a distinctively coloured label

  21. Tesch’s core position • Advantages: • One main product line: (almost) all Premium Riesling varieties, • Exploitation of one stop shopping via a completely different approach • Scope: • Appeal to the educated and discriminating buyer • High-end performance fits these customers • Tesch avoids the low end of the market • Tesch’s customers are (probably) not very price sensitive since they care more about quality • Tesch focuses exports – that’s where most of the sophisticated customers are

  22. Tesch’s sales and marketing • Sales to • Exports: 15 % • Gastronomy: 20 % • Retail: 30 % • Final custom: 35 % • Relationship buyers • Individual customers – repeat sales • Transaction buyers • Gastronomy • Retailers • “We … like to sell to the educated customer.”

  23. Summary • Strong one-stop purchasing effects • Standardization • extreme differentiation • strong ex ante, little ex post competition • Success is possible only if quality is high, variety is extreme • But this fits only “sophisticated customers” • Tesch generally provides high end Rieslings • Tesch is strong in the US market for dry wines, where there are many “sophisticated” customers

  24. Case Question: • Imagine that you would consider entering the market for wine production, by purchasing an established winery with conventional product portfolio. • Would you find it attractive imitating Tesch‘s strategy? • If not, what would be the best alternative business strategy?

More Related