1 / 32

East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River

East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River. In operation since 2003 2,297 Landowner / operators 540,782 irrigated acres Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Mariposa counties We manage group permit for our members. Coalition Overview.

york
Télécharger la présentation

East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. East San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition Parry Klassen Executive Director Merced River

  2. In operation since 2003 2,297 Landowner / operators 540,782 irrigated acres Madera, Merced, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Mariposa counties We manage group permit for our members Coalition Overview

  3. Board of Directors Board Officers Parry Klassen, Board Chairman Coalition for Urban Rural Executive Director Environmental Stewardship; fruit grower Wayne Zipser, Vice-Chairman Stanislaus Co. Farm Bureau Bill McKinney, Treasurer almond grower Board Members Amanda Carvajal Merced Co. Farm Bureau John Eisenhut Hilltop Ranch, almond grower Brian Franzia West Coast Vineyards Richard Gemperle Gemperle Enterprises, almond grower Anja K. Raudabaugh Madera Co. Farm Bureau Alan Reynolds Gallo Vineyards, Inc. Albert Rossini Rossini Ag, grape grower Jim Wagner Wilbur Ellis Co. Mike Neimi Turlock Irrigation District Non-voting Gary Caseri Stanislaus County Agricultural Commissioner David Robinson Merced County Agricultural Commissioner Bob Rolan Madera County Agricultural Commissioner Dianna Waller Natural Resources Conservation Service Dennis Wescot San Joaquin River Group Authority

  4. Approach for new ILRP • Maintain water quality coalitions • Geographic/commodity based orders • Develop high/low vulnerability areas • Focus requirements and plans on High Vulnerability areas Focus on management practice implementation and reporting Limited monitoring (compared to other programs)

  5. Known Nitrate Sources (Regional) Figure 1. Estimated groundwater nitrate loading from major sources within the Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley, in Gg nitrogen per year (1 Gg = 1,100 t). http://groundwaternitrate.ucdavis.edu/files/139110.pdf ; Viers, J.H., et al (2012). Nitrogen Sources and Loading to Groundwater

  6. Nitrates and Groundwater • Pollution pathways for nitrates and pesticides are similar • Nitrates/water soluble pesticides leach through soil to groundwater • Pathway for nitrates/pesticides • Surface runoff • Unprotected / improperly sealed wells • Over application of nitrogen fertilizer • Other conduits to groundwater (e.g., backflow)

  7. Member RequirementsCoalition Enrollment Existing members Current members confirm membership Must notify owners if tenant New members 120-day window to enroll with third-party (starts ~Nov. 15, 2012) After deadline, must apply to Regional Board, pay fee, before joining coalition

  8. Member RequirementsManagement Practices Implement management practices Practices found protective through representative groundwater monitoring program Respond to management plans Meet discharge limitations

  9. Member Requirements Activities and Reports Why the Reporting Requirements? The Water Board needs information to determine compliance - Is water quality being protected? Traditional reliance primarily on monitoring is EXPENSIVE Reporting on what you are doing to protect water quality will be much CHEAPER

  10. Member Requirements Activities and Reports Participate in annual outreach events Complete farm evaluation, other reporting as needed Describe water quality protection practices in place Site specific information Allow property access to Regional Board at reasonable hours - FOR COMPLIANCE INSPECTION PURPOSES ONLY! Focus on bad actors and complaints

  11. Member Requirements under ConsiderationHighly Vulnerable Areas Information reported to coalition • Individual farm evaluations • Nitrogen Budget reports - certification

  12. Member Requirements under ConsiderationLow Vulnerability Areas Information kept on farm: • Individual farm evaluations • Nitrogen budget reports Must be produced for Water Board inspections

  13. WDR Development Schedule

  14. WDR Development Schedule

  15. 1984-2004

  16. 2005-2010

  17. Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory Program ESJWQC Approach • Classification of vulnerable areas • Well head protection program • Nitrogen management plans

  18. Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory Program Assessment Report (due January 2014) • Rank land vulnerability based on Assessment Report • High Vulnerability Areas ID’d using DPR pesticide groundwater protection areas, State Water Board vulnerable areas • 2014: Farm assessment requirement starts • 2014: Nitrogen budget requirement starts • 2014 Well head protection • Low Vulnerability • Keep farm assessment/nitrogen budgets on farm

  19. Madera County Vulnerable Areas

  20. Wellhead Protection BMPs Wellhead house keeping Prevent ponding for extended periods Waste can enter if wellhead/casing is cracked or improperly sealed Grade away from wellhead to prevent storm runoff ponding Open discharge well Air gap between well discharge and receiving device Pressurized systems: Back flow preventers In case of power failures and/or pump malfunction Back siphoning can directly contaminate groundwater Abandoned wells Develop plan to manage

  21. Nitrogen Management Plan Components • Apply N at crop removal rates • Dairies regulated to 140% of crop use (N applications) • Test well water for nitrogen levels (then adjust N applications accordingly) • Leaf / tissue testing • Soil testing • Irrigation management

  22. Proposed reporting of nitrogen budget sheet information: • Submit form to Coalition • Coalition compiles ratios; separates into crops, “reporting areas” • “Reporting area” depends on aquifer, basin, sub basins, soil types etc.

  23. Field Reporting Map Completed by Grower

  24. Potentially applying too much N (outliers) Most growers (UC recommended rates)

  25. What the area report should show: • Where most growers are with nitrogen ratios • The “Outliners:” those who apply too much or too little • Focus of outreach with commodity specific information/references

  26. Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory Program Representative Monitoring Confirm that management practices implemented to improve groundwater quality are working • Are agricultural management practices protective of groundwater in high vulnerability areas • Assess effectiveness of any newly implemented management practices. Coalition to rank/prioritize high vulnerability areas and commodities and present phased approach Coordinated effort by coalitions/commodity groups to complete

  27. Waste Discharge RequirementsIrrigated Lands Regulatory ProgramRegional Water Board process • Next steps • Public review of draft WDR • Comment deadline July 31, 2012 • October 4, 2012 Regional Water Board ILRP meeting • Approve or delay? • After passage, ESJ has 30 days to apply to be Third Party • 120 day “holiday” to join coalition directly • Holiday ends February 1, 2013 (approximate)

  28. Parry Klassen 559-288-8125 www.esjcoalition.org

More Related