1 / 15

Alex Kaufman, PHD Candidate Faculty of Environment and Resource Study, Mahidol University Email: lex_int@yahoo.com

Creating Vibrant Communities through Ecologically Sound Food Production Theme: Social Transformation Research Domain: Ecological Diversity and Resilience. Alex Kaufman, PHD Candidate Faculty of Environment and Resource Study, Mahidol University Email: lex_int@yahoo.com.

Albert_Lan
Télécharger la présentation

Alex Kaufman, PHD Candidate Faculty of Environment and Resource Study, Mahidol University Email: lex_int@yahoo.com

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating Vibrant Communities through Ecologically Sound Food ProductionTheme: Social TransformationResearch Domain: Ecological Diversity and Resilience Alex Kaufman, PHD Candidate Faculty of Environment and Resource Study, Mahidol University Email: lex_int@yahoo.com

  2. Background: Post World War II (Asia) • The Cold War led to the strategic importance of Asia • US technical advise from the 50s, promoted development of infrastructure in the rural areas through agricultural aid • “Green Revolution” transforms rural economies • Extraction of commodities for local manufacturing and export • Period of sharp economic growth through the 80’s and 90’s • Prior to the Asian Economic crisis of 1997, the King warns that Thailand should follow a path of moderation: Sufficiency Economy

  3. Economic Development and Ecosystems • Fishing, aquaculture, agro-forestry and commodity based agriculture increase to meet urban demands • Results: reduced fish stocks, deforestation and pollution from agro-chemicals • Diminished capacity of ecosystems to provide essential services: food, clean water and cycling of waste • Self-sufficiency and stability of rural communities decrease as a result of the ecological transformation (UNEP 2007)

  4. A Global Supermarket • Modern economic development in its current form creates a loss of community identity, culture and traditional livelihoods • As modern society absorbs rural communities, local residents are forced to extract natural resources and engage in monoculture, aquaculture and other means of paying for basic requisites • The constant demand for resources to sustain city life and provide input for industry erodes the self-sufficiency of local communities and degrades the environment • Rural areas serve as a ‘supermarket’ which provides nourishment for the inhabitants of the city and fuels industry

  5. Rural-Urban Divide • The growth in urban areas has increased the demand upon rural areas for food production (60% of the world population: city based by 2050) • Food production consolidated through agro-industry • Monoculture degrades ecosystems services and human livelihoods • Rural farmers are experiencing a diminishing quality of life (Shiva 1991; UNEP 2007)

  6. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: RURAL-URBAN FOOD PRODUCTION CYCLE ECOSPHERE POLLUTION WASTE WATER CHEMICALS FEEDBACK FEEDBACK URBAN ZONE RURAL ZONE DECREASED QUALITY OF LIFE POLITICAL SOCIAL ECONOMIC TENSION INPUTS OUTPUTS INPUTS WATER FOOD ECOSYSTEM SERVICES

  7. Food Production and Ecosystem Integrity • Transformation of rural ecosystems in order to meet high levels of food demands in the urban areas • Production methods have a detrimental impact on rural ecosystems (monoculture, aquaculture, livestock) • Degraded ecosystems provide low quality food to all stakeholders • Urban areas remain put in place technological barriers to support their lifestyles (air-conditioning, heating, water-purification, etc.) (McNeely and Scherr 2003)

  8. Loss of Community Identity • Economic pressures force rural communities to engage in natural resource extraction, monoculture, aquaculture and other means of paying for basic requisites, once freely available in their community • Subsequent loss of community-identity, disintegration of culture and traditional livelihoods • Modern economics, science and related technology transform indigenous livelihoods - vernacular societies no longer preserve their natural resources through spiritual beliefs and traditions (Goldsmith 1996) - local watersheds and neighboring land no longer considered a commons (Hardin 1968)

  9. Indigenous Agriculture • Early societies highly conscious of food chains: sacredness of biodiversity • Insect control and soil fertility were organic processes: sourced locally/naturally • Water was part of the commons (Hardin 1963) • Ecologically sound and self-sufficient: ‘indigenous technology’ (Ramakrishnan 2006; Shiva 1991)

  10. Indigenous Agricultural Practices (Low Impact) (Shiva 1991) Shiva 1991

  11. Holistic Systems: “ecoagriculture” • Mechanized agriculture is expensive and unhealthy to humans and the environment • New approaches: organics, polyculture, biodiversity reserves, ecological management (Westra 2000) • NTA: New Theory Agriculture: 30/30/30/10 (Impaeng Network and Sufficiency Economy) • Agriculture which mimics natural systems (McNeely and Scherr 2003; Sathirathai and Piboolsravut 2004)

  12. Bioregions and Communities • Healthy farms, biodiversity reserves, and habitat networks form bioregions (McNeely and Scherr 2001; McGinnis 2005) • Farming communities delineated by natural watersheds and landscapes with a respect for ‘The Commons” • Self-sufficiency through regional trading networks: (Chumporn Cabana) and organics (Green Net) • Vital and healthy rural-urban communities through bioregionalism (Gray 2007) (UNDP 2007, Hardin 1963)

  13. Objectives • To survey the importance of healthy food to modern society • To study communities which have improved ecological integrity and quality of life through healthy food production • To critically examine how new paradigms based on self-sufficiency (sufficiency economy, GNH, GPI) are linked to food production • Develop an appropriate tool which can be utilized to measure the impacts of food production on ecosystem services, and quality of life • Test the functionality of this tool in several communities

  14. Hypotheses • Bioregional management of food production will lead to healthy food, and vibrant communities • Healthy food production translates into healthy ecosystems and an improved quality of life in rural and urban areas (Gray 2007; McGinnis 1999)

  15. Is this sustainable rural development? Email contact: lex_int@yahoo.com

More Related