1 / 34

Team CHIP: Controlled Human Interface for Prosthetics

Team CHIP: Controlled Human Interface for Prosthetics. Research Proposal Tuesday, March 11 th , 2007. Mentor: Dr. Pamela Abshire Graduate Student Mentor: Mr. Alfred Haas Avi Bardack Erik Li Pratik Bhandari Elaine Petro James Doggett Mark Sailey Max Epstein Natalie Salaets

Anita
Télécharger la présentation

Team CHIP: Controlled Human Interface for Prosthetics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Team CHIP: Controlled Human Interface for Prosthetics Research Proposal Tuesday, March 11th, 2007 Mentor: Dr. Pamela Abshire Graduate Student Mentor: Mr. Alfred Haas Avi Bardack Erik Li Pratik Bhandari Elaine Petro James Doggett Mark Sailey Max Epstein Natalie Salaets Nick Gagliolo Ben Tousley Steve Graff John (Andy) Turner

  2. Outline • Introduction/Motivation • Research Problem • Research Question • Background • State of the Art • Where do we come in? • Methodology • Timeline • Conclusion/Summary

  3. Introduction/Motivation • Simple, everyday tasks such as tying your shoes or drinking a cup of coffee are very difficult for those with artificial limbs. • 1.9 million amputees in America (NIH) • 50,000 more annually • 29,275 wounded in action during Operation Iraqi Freedom (U.S. DoD) • Significant percentage of wounded are amputees

  4. Research Problem • Lack of functionality is the biggest problem facing amputees (Demet, 2003) • Many opt for cosmetic alternative or hook • EMG prosthetic seeks to mitigate effects of physical disabilities • Existing technologies • Many utilize bulky and/or inefficient interfaces • Other models require surgery http://www.amputee-coalition.org/inmotion/nov_dec_02/handl_img02.jpg

  5. Research Question • How can an EMG signal classifying chip be designed to enhance interactions between people and technological systems?

  6. Background • Electromyographical (EMG) signal: the electric potential generated when a muscle contracts • Can be detected at the skin surface • Interface between people and technology http://www.dataq.com/images/article_images/emg.jpg

  7. Signal Processing Background • Noise Removal/Conditioning • Feature Extraction • Classification

  8. Fourier Transform dspguide.com

  9. Linear Envelope Generation http://educ.ubc.ca/faculty/sanderson/EMG/Documents/emg_linear_envelope.htm

  10. Classification • Manual/Arbitrary • (Semi)Automatic • PCA (Principle Component Analysis) • ANN (Artificial Neural Network)

  11. Hardware Background input output • Front-end • Bioamplifier magnifies weak bioelectric signal • Sets to appropriate level for classifier • Example: Harrison et al., 2003 • CMOS bioamplifier with range of 25 mHz - 7.2 kHz • Consumes 80 µW of power • Occupies 0.16 mm2 area of chip Preamplifier Classifiers Postamplifier

  12. Hardware Background 2 input output Preamplifier Classifiers Postamplifier • Classifiers • Performs mathematical operations on amplified signal based on chosen signal processing algorithm • Depends on signal characteristics of interest • Example: Horiuchi et al., 2007 • On-chip comparator detected spikes in signal • Based on measurements of peaks and troughs

  13. Hardware Background 3 input output Preamplifier Classifiers Postamplifier • Back-end • Amplifier scales the classifier output to level appropriate for application • e.g. prosthetic control, video game control, etc. • Entire System • Low-power • Amplifiers: low-noise

  14. State of the Art Technology • Otto Bock • Utah Arm

  15. Recent Prototypes • Variability of Signal • Neural Network • Portability vs. Functionality • Number of Motions Discriminated and Accuracy Rate

  16. Su et al., 2007

  17. Where do we come in? • EMG-controlled Prosthetic • Improved range of motion • More natural movements • Decreased learning/adaptation time • Entire system implemented on portable, miniaturized chip

  18. Methodology • Engineering problem solving approach • Signal Acquisition • Signal Classification • Hardware Implementation • Prototype Testing

  19. Konishi et al., 2007

  20. Signal Acquisition Getting the best sEMG signal: • Preamplifier • Choice of Muscles • Size of electrodes

  21. Signal Classification • Need to select algorithms for noise reduction and signal classification • Determine common methods and techniques from literature search • Test effectiveness on existing data sets • Decide which features of the signal will be useful in classification • Use iterative development to improve selected algorithm

  22. Criteria for Evaluation • Efficiency • Accuracy • Ease of implementation • Robustness • Binary/Proportional

  23. Evaluation of Algorithms • Decided on four algorithms to explore further • Fourier Transform • Independent Component Analysis (ICA) • Principle Component Analysis (PCA) • Support Vector Machine (SVM) • Will implement these in code • Evaluate each based on criteria

  24. Hardware Implementation • Evaluate three different approaches for implementing system: • FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) • Mixed-Signal IC (Integrated Circuit) • DSP (Digital Signal Processor)

  25. FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) Tools: HDL (Hardware Description Language), Code Power – BAD Speed – GOOD Size – GOOD Ease of Implementation – EASY Precision based on bits http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/35/Fpga_xilinx_spartan.jpg/556px-Fpga_xilinx_spartan.jpg

  26. Mixed-Signal IC (Integrated Circuit) Tools: Design, HDL for Digital ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) Power – BEST Speed – BEST Size – BEST Ease of Implementation – HARD Precision based on noise http://www.uta.edu/ra/real/images/0/537_0_570.jpg

  27. DSP (Digital Signal Processor) Tools: Development Kit, Program Power – OK Speed – OK Size – OK Ease of Implementation – EASY Precision based on bits http://www.kk7p.com/images/dspx2185a.jpg

  28. Testing • Preliminary Phase • Test prototype on team members • No IRB required • Secondary Phase • Test improved prototype on outside subjects • College students • Amputees at Walter Reed Army Medical Center • Two sub-phases • Front-end only • Full integrated system • IRB required

  29. Summary • Ultimate goal: EMG signal classifying system implemented in hardware • Low-power • Minimal delay • Miniaturized • Applied to an improved EMG controlled prosthetic • More degrees of freedom • Decreased learning/adaptation time • Other applications in biological signal processing

  30. Timeline • Sophomore Year • Fall 2007 • Study previous IBIS Lab EMG software, hardware and data • Decide on target muscle groups • Evaluate simple signal processing algorithms for classification in MATLAB • Learn basic integrated circuit design and development • Spring 2008 • Identify/contact outside individuals for secondary testing phase • Design/develop optimal signal processing algorithm • Continue learning integrated circuit design and development • Choose between prefabricated and/or custom chip • Select showcase application of our technology • Conduct preliminary testing of EMG system components in lab • Apply for IRB approval

  31. Timeline 2 • Junior Year • Fall 2008 • Simulate implementation of the algorithm on a chip • Optimize and debug chip design • Draft chapter 1 and 2 of thesis • Send in chip design to manufacturer (if custom chip) to be constructed • Complete preliminary testing phase • Spring 2009 • Begin testing actual chip with outside test subjects (secondary testing phase) • Revise/optimize chip design based on test results • Resubmit chip design to manufacturer, if necessary • Draft and revise chapters 1-3 of thesis • Search for organizations/businesses with possible interest in our project

  32. Timeline 3 • Senior Year • Fall 2009 • Develop physical demonstration of our technology • Possibly pitch project to interested organizations/businesses • Complete entire draft of thesis, make revisions • Draft thesis presentation • Possibly file for a patent for our chip • Spring 2010 • Practice thesis presentation at rehearsal • Finalize thesis, submit draft • Present and defense thesis at Team Thesis Conference • Revise and submit final thesis • Possibly publish work in relevant technical journal

  33. References • Demet, K., Martinet, N., Guillemin, F., Paysant, J., & Andre, J. (2003). Health related quality of life and related factors in 539 persons with amputation of upper and lower limb. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25(9; 9), 480. • Harrison, R. R., & Charles, C. (2003). A low-power low-noise CMOS amplifier for neural recording applications. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, 38(6), 958-965. • Horiuchi, T., Tucker, D., Boyle, K., & Abshire, P. (2007). Spike discrimination using amplitude measurements with a low-power CMOS neural amplifier. Circuits and Systems, 2007. ISCAS 2007. IEEE International Symposium on, 3123-3126. • Tenore F., Ramos A., Fahmy A., Acharya S., Etienne-Cummings R., Thakor N., “Towards the Control of Individual Fingers of a Prosthetic Hand Using Surface EMG Signals”, Proc. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, August 23-26, 2007. • United States Department of Defense. (2008). OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM (OIF) U.S. CASUALTY STATUS. Retrieved February 28, 2008 from http://www.defenselink.mil/news/casualty.pdf

  34. Thank you!Questions?

More Related