1 / 43

Oak Wilt in Texas

Oak Wilt in Texas. and the. Texas Oak Wilt Suppression Project. Oak Wilt. Veinal necrosis on live oak. Caused by the fungal pathogen Ceratocystis fagacearum. This native pathogen affects oaks in some 20 eastern and mid-western states (worst outbreak is in Texas).

Anita
Télécharger la présentation

Oak Wilt in Texas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Oak Wilt in Texas and the Texas Oak Wilt Suppression Project

  2. Oak Wilt Veinal necrosis on live oak • Caused by the fungal pathogen Ceratocystis fagacearum. • This native pathogen affects oaks in some 20 eastern and mid-western states (worst outbreak is in Texas). • Fungal spores vectored by insects, primarily nitidulid beetles. • Red oaks andlive oaks are most susceptible. • Veinal necrosis is a diagnostic symptom on live oak leaves.

  3. Oak Wilt in Texas • First identified in Texas in Dallas in 1961. • Live oaks and red (Spanish) oaks are most severely affected. • Only red oaks produce fungal mats. • Most tree losses occur from pathogen spread through connected root systems (common in live oaks). Fungal mat on red oak

  4. Distribution of Oak Wilt in Texas • 55 counties in Central Texas • 6 counties in West Texas Fort Worth Dallas College Station Austin San Antonio Houston Counties in Texas with oak wilt cover an area larger than VT, NH, MA, CT, NJ, RI and MD combined.

  5. Impact of Oak Wilt in Texas Rural Areas Thousands of acres of live oaks have become victims of oak wilt in rural areas of Central Texas.

  6. Impact of Oak Wilt in Texas Rural Residential Areas Loss of live oaks to oak wilt has greater economic impact around ranch houses.

  7. Impact of Oak Wilt in Texas Suburban Areas (1-10 acres) The many new “ranchettes” (<10 ac) in Central Texas have increased incidence and impact of oak wilt.

  8. Impact of Oak Wilt in Texas Urban Areas (< 1 acre) Oak wilt may reduce urban property values by 15-20%.

  9. Texas Oak Wilt Suppression Project 1988 - 2001

  10. Cooperators • USDA Forest Service/ Forest Health Protection • Texas Forest Service • Cities, neighborhoods, private landowners • Texas Cooperative Extension • Texas Agricultural Experiment Station • Lower Colorado River Authority

  11. TFS Oak Wilt Staff • Project director (10%)* + support staff • Administrative coordinator (30%) + support staff • Oak wilt technical coordinator (100%) • Oak wilt field coordinator (35%) • 6 staff foresters (45 - 80%) • 5 urban foresters (10 - 15%)* percent of time devoted to Oak Wilt Project

  12. Oak Wilt Technical Advisory Board • Dr. Dave Appel, TAMU • Dr. Brad Barber, TFS • Dr.Ron Billings, TFS • Carrie Burns, City of Lakeway • Kim Camilli, TFS • Jay Culver, City of Austin • Eugene Gehring, Arborist • Jordy Hagen, Bartlett Tree Services • Emsud Horosovic, City of Round Rock • Billy Kniffen, Hays County Extension • Jon Long, Oak Wilt Specialists of Texas • Dr. Forrest Oliveria, USDA Forest Service • Curt Randa, City of Cedar Park • Dale Starkey, USDA Forest Service • Damon Waitt, Johnson Wildflower Center • Dr. Dan Wilson, USDA Forest Service • = New Members in 2001

  13. Project Objectives • Public awareness • Detection and evaluation • Technical assistance to landowners • Cost shares for oak wilt control • Special projects • Implement long-range management of oak wilt

  14. Increase Public Awarenessof Oak Wilt

  15. Public Awareness • Circulars and publications • Internet web pages, public fairs • Training sessions, tours and demonstrations • Responding to phone calls, e-mail inquiries • News articles, videos, posters, displays, etc. • One-on-one site visits

  16. Oak Wilt Training in Boerne August 17, 2001 150 Participants

  17. Oak Wilt Hot Line For answers to most often asked questions Call 512 - 473 - 3517 Courtesy of Lower Colorado River Authority

  18. Cost Share Procedures • Initial contact • Field inspection • Cultural resource survey • Treatment plan • Landowner agreement • Treatment installation • Completion report • Reimbursement (50%) • Post-suppression evaluation

  19. Barrier Treatments • Trenching (at least 4 feet deep) to halt oak wilt spread through connected root systems • Roguing (removal of diseased trees within trenched area)

  20. Most Common Trenching Equipment in Texas Ripper Bar Back Hoe Rock Saw

  21. 52-Inch Rock SawUsed in Recent Years

  22. Trenching Accomplishments1988 - 2001 • To date, the Project has installed a total of 2,655,900feet (503 miles) of trenches in 35counties since 1988 to halt the spread of 1,903 oak wilt centers. • Equivalent to a trench extending from Houston to Lubbock. • Of this total, ca. 8% have been installed in urban sites, 14% in suburban sites, 35% in rural residential sites, and 43% in rural non-residential sites. • Two of every 3 trenches have held without breakouts.

  23. Cost/foot and number of trenches vary with land use category • Rural Non-residential: More than 10 acre ranch without a residence in vicinity of trench • Rural Residential: Home site on ranch of more than 10 acres • Suburban: 1-10 acre home sites in transition area between rural and urban areas • Urban: Urban residential setting (< 1 acre)

  24. Percent of Total Trenches by Land Use Percent U = Urban S = Suburban R. R. = Rural Residential R. N. = Rural Non-residential

  25. Cost of Oak Wilt Trenching by Land Use Total Cost/Foot U = Urban S = Suburban R. R. = Rural Residential R. N. = Rural Non-residential

  26. What are Economic Benefits of 500 miles of trenches? • The 500 miles of trenches effectively protect a total of15,000 acresfrom oak wilt spread over 5 years. • These 15,000 acres include 20,000 urban trees, valued at$70 million,150,000 suburban trees ($47 million), 110,000 trees ($78 million)on rural residential sites, and210,000 trees($5 million)on rural non-residential sites. • The total value saved is ca. $200 million for an investment of $10 million.

  27. Prevention

  28. Prevention of Oak Wilt • Avoid pruning between January and June • Paint wounds and pruning cuts • Remove and dispose of diseased trees • Treat threatened oaks with fungicide Alamo® • Proper management of oak firewood • Plant resistant trees, diversify landscapes

  29. Other Special Projects • Aerial sketch mapping and ground verification of oak wilt centers • Development of computerized data management system • Economic analysis of Project activities • Partnerships with cities of Austin and Lakeway • National Oak Wilt Symposium; North American Forest Insect Work Conference

  30. Aerial Detection Surveys • Sketch map surveys conducted over 13 million acres (319 USGS quadrangles or 19 counties). • Total of 8,002 mortality centers detected on 13 million acres; of 5,714 centers (71%) ground checked to date, 4,989 (87%) are oak wilt. • An estimated 6,962 oak wilt centers occur on the 13 million acres of land surveyed to date. • Assuming 20% of land in oaks, this represents 2.7 oak wilt centers/1000 acres of host type.

  31. Economic Analysis FY 1990 - 1996 Objective: To determine the economic efficiency of the Texas Oak Wilt Suppression Project. Benefits: Infected tree removal and tree replanting costs avoided by cooperators due to Project- installed trenches to halt oak wilt spread for 5 years (although many additional benefits are involved). Costs: Total Project costs, including cost shares and administrative costs ($5,491,468 for FY 1990-1996).

  32. Results of Benefit : Cost Analysis Urban 6 : 1 Suburban 14 : 1 Rural Residential 8 : 1 Rural Non-residential 4 : 1

  33. Project Accomplishments • Network of TFS foresters established throughout Central Texas to provide technical assistance. • Aerial detection surveys conducted over 13 million acres (ca. 19 counties); ca. 8,000 oak wilt centers detected and 5,000 confirmed on ground to date. • Public awareness of oak wilt greatly increased and $1.6 million of cost shares distributed in 35 counties. • More than 2.6 million feet (503 miles) of trenches installed to control 1,900 oak wilt centers. • Several thousand infected red oaks removed and live oaks injected with fungicide.

  34. Highlights in FY 2000-2001 • Oak wilt technical coordinator position filled (Kim Camilli); 10 new members added to Technical Advisory Board. • New office opened in Johnson City (Robert Edmonson); Lampasas position filled (Jay Hein). • City of Lakeway adopted as newest city partner and oak wilt forester hired by city (Carrie Burns). • Oak wilt “how to” brochure translated into Spanish. • Computerized Operations Information System revamped. • Office facilities in Austin expanded to better serve public.

  35. The Texas Oak Wilt Program is integrated with other federal programs.

  36. Coordination with other Programs Oak Wilt Program Stewardship Program Urban Forestry Program Fire Prevention Program

  37. What is the Impact of the Suppression Project on a Landscape Scale? • Assume 8,000 - 10,000 oak wilt centers in Texas • Only 150 - 200 centers controlled per year with Project assistance • New centers develop each year as Texas’ population expands • Without additional federal and state support, the Project is unlikely to substantially reduce the incidence of oak wilt on a landscape scale.

  38. Does this mean that suppression efforts are futile? Oak wilt in Texas Suppression Project

  39. Are Suppression Efforts Futile? Definitely Not !

  40. Oak wilt is analogous to auto accidents • Both will increase as the human population in Central Texas increases. • Frequency and severity can be reduced through public education (= defensive driving class). • With oak wilt, trenching reduces potential losses, as do seat belts and air bags in autos. • Prevention is preferred and most effective approach.

  41. Long-range Strategic Plan • Apply integrated approach to pest management • Identify priority areas for education, prevention & suppression • Empower communities to address oak wilt • Increase state funding; technical assistance staff • Seek federal funds from federal Cooperative Forest Health Program • Plant resistant trees; diversify landscapes

  42. When it comes to oak wilt, Texans are learning to: Make the best of a bad situation

  43. Thank youfor your attention!

More Related