100 likes | 226 Vues
This document outlines the Wisconsin Department of Transportation's response to questions from the Special Committee on Weight Limits and discusses the effects of different truck weights and configurations on pavement damage and infrastructure life cycles. It highlights the impact of Environmental Stress and Load Factors on road wear, the importance of aggregate quality, and compares Wisconsin's bridge designs and weight limits to those of Michigan. Additionally, it addresses the challenges posed by illegal overweight vehicles on local roads.
E N D
Highway Weight Limits Wisconsin Department of Transportation Response to Questions from the Special Committee on Weight Limits November 13, 2006
The Effect of ESALs • A method of expressing the effect of loads on pavement relative to an 18,000 pound single axle • A six axle truck at 120,000 GVW has about the same impact on a pavement as a five axle 98,000 GVW truck • Either of those loads cause about 400% more pavement damage than a 90,000 GVW, six axle truck
Harder Pavement Aggregates WisDOT specifies high quality aggregates suitable for the pavement design Designing pavements for heavier loads can be accomplished in a number of ways Limiting aggregates to a single type or source is cost prohibitive
Effect of Wider Tires • Tire loads affect localized areas • Narrow width tires concentrate weight on a small area • Wider tires distribute the weight over a larger area and cause less stress on a single spot • Axle loads are relevant regardless of the spot stresses • Total loads may cause damage or failure even if the local point stresses are not large • Refer to Washington DOT material for their description
Effect of Changing from 73,000 to 80,000 pound limit for cement trucks • No specific information • Assuming truck configurations, travel speed, tire pressure, and vehicle suspension were unchanged, the roughly 10% increase in load would increase pavement wear by perhaps 80%, possibly offset or mitigated by trip reduction • Rough relationship reflects the geometric relationship between increased loads and impacts on infrastructure
Factors influencing life cycle of roads and bridges • Loads • Capacity and uses • Environment
Comparing Standards • Wisconsin • Majority of bridges designed for 36 tons or less (HS15 or HS20) • Michigan • Typically design for HS25 truck (90,000 pound GVW) – although max legal weight is 164,000 • Law requires very specific axle spacing and weight configurations • Bridge postings are subject to considering 31 various legal loads on each bridge (versus just 3 for most states) – result is more posted bridges
Comparing Systems • MI system is showing the effects of heavy loads • Deficient bridges much more common • MI 28% of bridges deficient • WI 16% of bridges deficient • Reflects accelerated wear and also generates need for more intensive maintenance and rehabilitation at greater cost
Conditions of Local Roads • Bridge information is available for local roads • Other local road information for pavements is just being accumulated and detailed information about roadway structure is not readily available • Many local roads are not designed or constructed for heavy loads
Costs of Illegal Overweight Vehicles to the State • Unable to provide a reliable estimate due to inadequate knowledge of: • Number of illegal loads • Miles driven by illegal loads • Roads impacted by these loads