1 / 20

Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for estimating protein-ligand affinities

Ronald Levy Emilio Gallicchio , Mauro Lapelosa Chemistry Dept &BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University. Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for estimating protein-ligand affinities. Ways of Estimating Binding Affinities. Binding Free Energy Methods.

Ava
Télécharger la présentation

Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for estimating protein-ligand affinities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ronald Levy Emilio Gallicchio, Mauro Lapelosa Chemistry Dept &BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for estimating protein-ligand affinities

  2. Ways of Estimating Binding Affinities

  3. Binding Free Energy Methods • In principle they account for: • Total binding free energy • Entropic costs • Ligand/receptor reorganization Free Energy Perturbation (FEP/TI) Double Decoupling (DDM) McCammon, Jorgensen, Kollman (1980’s – present) Jorgensen, Gilson, Roux, Dill (2000’s – to present) • : • Challenges: • Dissimilar ligand sets • Dependence on starting conformations • Multiple bound poses • Numerical instability • Slow convergence

  4. Statistical Thermodynamics Theory of Binding [Gilson et al., (1997)] Binding “energy” of a fixed conformation of the complex. W(): solvent PMF Ligand in binding site in absence of ligand-receptor interactions Probability distribution of binding energy in “0” ensemble Formalism homologous to Particle Insertion for solvation (Pratt, Widom, etc.)

  5. Choice of Vsite • Free energy gain for turning on ligand-receptor interactions • Gets less favorable as Vsite is increased • Entropic work to place the ligand in binding site from a solution at concentration C° • Gets more favorable as Vsite is increased • The two effects cancel each other out • Result insensitive to choice of Vsite as long as it contains all of the bound conformations

  6. The Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) P0 (ΔE): encodes all enthalpic and entropic effects Integration problem: region at favorable ΔE’s is seriously undersampled. P0(ΔE) P0(ΔE ) [kcal/mol-1] • Solution: • Hamiltonian Replica Exchange +WHAM • Biasing potential = λ ΔE • Ideal for cluster computing. Main contribution to integral ΔE [kcal/mol]

  7. Improved Sampling with HREM Uncouple-MD • Better sampling at λ≈1 • BEDAM/HREM less sensitive to initial conditions than BEDAM/MD Phenol bound to L99A/M102Q T4 Lysozyme X-ray pose ΔFb [kcal/mol] Coupled-HREM “Bad” pose time [ns]

  8. Binding Affinity Density Can write: with “Binding Affinity Density” Measures contribution to binding constant from conformations at ΔE k(ΔE) Spread indicative of multiple poses entropically favored k(ΔE) Average binding energy (“enthalpic” component) ΔE ΔE

  9. H H H The AGBNP2 Implicit Solvent Model OPLS-AA/AGBNP Non-Polar Hydration First-Shell Hydration Analytical Generalized Born Parameter-free pairwise descreening implementation Analytical intermolecular HB potential Cavity/vdW dispersion decomposition. Gallicchio, Paris, Levy, JCTC, 5, 2544-2564 (2009). Gallicchio, Levy. JCC, 25, 479-499 (2004).

  10. Improved Intramolecular Interactions • MD simulations of mini-proteins with the AGBNP 2.0 model • Number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds now agrees with explicit solvent and NMR. FSD TrpCage PSV

  11. L99A Hydrophobic cavity L99A/M102Q Polar cavity Brian Matthews Brian Shoichet Benoit Roux David Mobley Ken Dill John Chodera Graves, Brenk and Shoichet, JMC (2005) Results for Binding to Mutants of T4 Lysozyme BEDAM: 2ns HREM, 12 replicas λ={10-6, 10-5, 10-4, 10-3, 10-2, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.2} IMPACT + OPLS-AA/AGBNP2

  12. Isosteric Ligand Set L99A – Apolar L99A/M102Q – Polar Binders Binders benzene iso-butylbenzene phenol 3-chlorophenol indole toluene catechol toluene Non-Binders Non-Binders phenol 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene 4-vinylpiridine phenylhydrazine cyclohexane ter-butylbenzene 2-aminophenol 4-chloro-1h-pyrazole

  13. Binders vs. Non-Binders L99A T4 Lysozyme, Apolar Cavity L99A/M102Q T4 Lysozyme, Polar Cavity

  14. Free Energy vs. Energy-based Predictors L99A/M102Q T4 Lysozyme, Polar Cavity • The minimum binding energy is poorly correlated to binding free energy • Average binding energy is a somewhat better predictor

  15. 3-chlorophenol ΔF°b=-3.47 kcal/mol Kb = (1.77 + 0.71 + 0.28)  103 catechol ΔF°b=-3.44 kcal/mol Kb = (1.48 + 1.31)  103 k(ΔE) [kcal/mol-1] Xtal1 52% Xtal2 46% Xtal 62% pose2 25% pose3 10% ΔE [kcal/mol] ΔE [kcal/mol] Conformational Decomposition Observed binding constant is a weighted average of the binding constants of individual macrostates i Macrostate-specific binding constant Macrostate population at λ=0 Observed affinity due to multiple binding poses

  16. Reorganization (ligand and receptor) • Reorganization refers to the free energy cost to restrict the system to the bound conformation • λ-coupling in BEDAM is a partial solution, • Additional ways to accelerate sampling of unbound states using (multi-dimensional) replica exchange are available Example: TMC278 HIV-RT Inhibitor Temperature replica exchange + WHAM Bound conformation P3% Frenkel, Gallicchio, Das, Levy, Arnold. JMC (2009) Okumura, Gallicchio, Levy, JCC, 2010

  17. Reorganization: large scale studies Ligand Receptor • 146 ligands for 4 target receptors: • ABL-kinase, P38-kinase, nn-HIVRT, PDE4 • Temperature RE calculations HIV-RT (non-nucleoside site) Analysis of ~100 crystal structures Count ΔF(reorg) [kcal/mol] • The majority of ligands have reorganization free energy > 1 kcal/mol Paris, Haq, Felts, Das, Arnold, Levy. JMC (2009)

  18. Sampling Enhancements for reorganization • (λ, T)-replica exchange with conformation reservoirs Precomputed receptor and ligand T-REM conformational reservoirs at λ=0. λ 0 T • Reservoirs at λ=0 provide conformational diversity • Calculations for ligand reservoirs are inexpensive • Receptor λ=0 reservoir needs to be computed only once • Can include a “knowledge-based” set from crystal structures

  19. Conclusions • BEDAM: binding affinities from probability distributions of binding energies in a special ensemble (l=0) • Full account of entropic effects • Efficient implementation based on parallel HREM sampling and WHAM; well matched to underlying theory • Illustrative calculations on T4 Lysozyme • Enhancements needed to fully treat ligand/receptor reorganization

  20. Ronald Levy Emilio Gallicchio, Mauro Lapelosa Chemistry Dept &BioMaPS Institute, Rutgers University Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method (BEDAM) for estimating protein-ligand affinities

More Related