1 / 31

Pest Surveillance & Farm Advisories A New Approach

Pest Surveillance & Farm Advisories A New Approach. Dr WR Reddy New Delhi, 26 February 2008. what is the problem? . Though 80% Farm advisories relate to pests & diseases, surveillance, the basis of advisories, covers limited area

Ava
Télécharger la présentation

Pest Surveillance & Farm Advisories A New Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pest Surveillance & Farm Advisories A New Approach Dr WR Reddy New Delhi, 26 February 2008

  2. what is the problem? • Though 80% Farm advisories relate to pests & diseases, surveillance, the basis of advisories, covers limited area • No convergence in data of surveillance by multiple agencies • Authenticity/reliability is a problem? • No accurate early warning at district, state or national level • Much plant protection advice based on broad generalisations…. sometimes extrapolated from ‘hotspots’ to unaffected areas; leading mostly to use of pesticides

  3. the consequences are… • Over-consumption of pesticides with impact on environment + livelihoods + market access • Missed opportunities for early intervention • Advisories always – curative than preventive • No data base builds up for forecasting models • No system to monitor “climate change” induced crop pest-benificials relationships

  4. Invasive “catastrophes” not picked up until too late Phalaris minor San Jose scale/ apple • Mexico Blight/ chickpea U.S.A Lantana camara Middle East PStV/ peanut C. America B. tabaci Biotype B/ cotton BBTV/ banana Golden nematode/ potato Sri Lanka U.K.

  5. a solution • To improve this situation, and provide useful early warning for farmers, the different agencies need to work together on pest surveillance • A vital first step is to obtain convergent good quality data on actual/emerging pest problems. This requires: • a new pest surveillance partnership for field surveillance, and for better advice to farmers • standardisation of - surveillance methods - predictive models based on sound IPM principles - and data collection formats • Geo-referenced data capture • All of these will benefit from use of common tools such as an ICT enabled handheld device by surveyors

  6. …a new pest surveillance partnership

  7. partnership comes together around a project A 6 month pilot project to develop a robust field data collection instrument, involving: • State Department of Agriculture • CIPMC • SAUs • NCIPM • NIC • ICT provider (Infronics Systems Ltd) with catalytic funding from FAO (through FAO Norway-PCA), and tested in Andhra Pradesh since the end of January

  8. Data Flow – National e-Pest Surveillance Project NCIPM Database Server NIC GIS Server upload Data Collection by CIPMC Net connected PC Processed data Advisory Reports Users

  9. Sample report

  10. Outcome • Geo-referenced reliable data points across the country • Uniform surveillance protocols & convergence • Effective use of ICT aids in processed reports available in 24 hours • Possible for predicting pest developments & pest forecasting • Over the years “ climate change impact” can be studied and develop appropriate mitigation steps • Easy to expand to more area & widen the sample size for advisories • Better farm advisories leading to effective pest management • Farmer’s prosperity

  11. Further steps • Pilot is working well; currently for rice, groundnut, pulses – to extend to all AP from May • 20 devices available for use by CIPMCs (by trained surveyors) • Initial cost Rs 38,000 each (~Rs 20-25,000 if large volume) – may need 6-10 per district • Technical specifications are made for procurement • NPPTI ready to provide training • Expand the area with more hand held devices • Evolve for enabling farmers inputting data • Setting up of national, state, district surveillance and advisory units

  12. 100% SEED TREATMENT CAMPAIGN - KHARIF 2008

  13. Outcome of Rabi Campaign 2007-08 • Crops covered were wheat, mustard, gram, arhar, sugar cane& potato • States took active interest • Area under seed treatment increased in all states • Active participation by pesticide industry • Mass awareness campaign through print, electronic media & publicity material.

  14. Haryana Seed treatment in various crops 2007-08 (Rabi & Kharif) • Cotton - 100%, increase by 25% • Paddy - 94%, increase by 23% • Sugarcane- 80%, increase by 23% • Wheat - 90%, increase by 50% • Gram - 80%, increase by 50% • Barley - 81%, increase by 24%

  15. Maharashtra Seed treatment in various crops 2007-08 • Jawar - 66%, increase by 31% • Maize - 83%, increase by 55% • Paddy - 85%, increase by 36% • Pulses - 65%, increase by 33% • Soybean - 61%, increase by 35% • Wheat - 77%, increase by 41% • Gram - 68%, increase by 37% • Oilseeds - 62%, increase by 22%

  16. Orissa Seed treatment in various crops 2007-08 • Paddy- 25%, increase by7 % • Pulses- 24%, increase by 10% • Mustard- 30%, increase by 8% • Groundnut- 48%, increase by 18% • Cotton- 100%, increase by 20%

  17. Strategy for Kharif 2008 • Campaign should start in time • Need to adopt Seed Treatment in mission Mode, maximum reach to farmers • Massive use of Print & Electronic Media • Involve KVKs, ATMA on a larger scale • Involve school children in Seed Treatment (Haryana Example) • State/District Coordination Committee should become more active • Make provision for funding Campaign through RKVY

  18. Strategy Continued • Preparation of crop wise, region wise seed treatment practices. • Ensure adequate Supply of Quality Seed Treatment Material • Role of Seed Corporation • Training to farmers for safe and correct use of pesticides through FFS • Ensure availability of Seed Treating Machines at village level

  19. Strategy ContinuedRole of Pesticide Industry • Industry to play an important role • Ensure quality products • Each Industry should adopt specific areas for spreading awareness • May rope in some celebrity for spreading message ( as in polio campaign) • Pesticide dealers to be trained

  20. Be watchful about ? • Seed supplied by State agencies is always treated ? • Right chemical ? • Right quantity ? • Right method ? • Pesticide supplied in a pouch along with the seed always used for treatment? • Quality ? • Label prescription ? • Seed treatment need to be done just before sowing? • Pesticide be given as separate pouch, so that if the seed is not used for sowing, the same can be consumed !

  21. Our Mission is; Food Security through 100% seed treatment (Do not sow without seed treatment)

  22. Quality Control of pesticides • Preventive Assurance Mechanism • Ensure minimum infrastructure in manufacturing units • ISO certified processing • Risk based quality analysis • ABCD analysis and plan for drawing of samples • Source sampling • Strengthening quality testing infrastructure • More SPTLs • Technical personnel positioning • NABL accreditation • Timely penal action • Corruption control

  23. Quality Control- Initiatives by DAC • Conducting a study on sampling procedures in the country. • Improvement in CIL/RPTL Standards • Campaign against Spurious Pesticides • Contemplating training of pesticide dealers • Contemplating online tracking of samples in CIL/RPTL • Online Registration in CIB&RC

  24. Thank You

More Related