1 / 25

Alternative Research Designs

Alternative Research Designs. Visualizing Designs. Block notation Useful for visualizing conditions, interactions Design notation Useful for seeing the temporal sequence of the experiment. Design Notation. Elements: Observations/Measures: O Treatments/Programs: X

Gabriel
Télécharger la présentation

Alternative Research Designs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Alternative Research Designs

  2. Visualizing Designs • Block notation • Useful for visualizing conditions, interactions • Design notation • Useful for seeing the temporal sequence of the experiment

  3. Design Notation • Elements: • Observations/Measures: O • Treatments/Programs: X • Conditions: Each condition has its own line • Assignment to group: • R = Random assignment • N = Nonequivalent groups • C = Assignment by cutoff • Time: Moves from left to right

  4. Design Notation • Kasser & Sheldon (2000) • Bransford & Johnson (1972)? R XMS F O R Xmusic F O

  5. Alternative Research Designs • Quasi-experimental designs • Nonequivalent groups • Interrupted time series • Small-N designs

  6. Quasi-Experimental Designs • Strictly speaking—true experiments use random assignment or counterbalancing • Quasi-experiments: • You cannot randomly assign experimental participants to groups • You DO manipulate an IV • You DO measure a DV

  7. When to use quasi-experimental design? • Study participants in certain groups • Evaluate an ongoing or completed program/intervention • Study social conditions (examples: poverty, race, unemployment) • Expense, time, or monitoring difficulties • Ethical considerations

  8. Nonequivalent Groups Design • Structured like a pretest-postest randomized experiment • Key is to create as equal a comparison group as possible through our selection criteria N O X O (treatment) N O O (comparison)

  9. Nonequivalent Groups Design • Example: Geronimous (1991) • Typical outcomes for teen mothers: • Poverty, high-school dropout rates increase, higher infant mortality • Geronimous believed that family factors, like SES, were better predictors of outcomes than teen pregnancy • How to find a comparison group as similar as possible?

  10. Nonequivalent Groups Design: Analysis • Example: Fry pan company wants to institute a flextime schedule • Pittsburgh plant (experimental group) • Cleveland plant (comparison group) NPitt O Xflextime O NClev O O

  11. Nonequivalent Groups Design: Analysis • Your groups began the experiment as not equivalent • So, the important question is not whether there was a difference • Is the difference the same as before the experiment?

  12. Nonequivalent Groups Design • Threats to Internal Validity • Maturation • Instrumentation • Interaction between selection and history • Statistical regression

  13. Regression and Matching • Use matching as a control procedure to create equivalent groups • BUT! What if the groups come from populations that are different on the factor that’s used as the matching variable?

  14. Regression and Matching • Example: Improving reading skills in disadvantaged youth • Treatment (reading program): Most in need • Comparison group: Similar neighborhood in other cities • Match groups according to initial reading skill

  15. Regression tendency Improvement tendency 25 17 Population mean Regression tendency 35 Population mean 29 25 Regression and Matching Experimental Group Pretest = 25 Reading program Posttest = 25 Comparison Group Pretest = 25 Posttest = 29

  16. Nonequivalent Groups Design • Interpretation of findings must be more cautious than for a true experiment, but a strong research design

  17. Interrupted Time-Series Design • Measure a group of participants repeatedly over time • Interrupt with a treatment • Measure participants repeatedly again O1 O2 O3 O4 X O5 O6 O7 O8

  18. Interrupted Time-Series Design • Threats to Internal Validity • History • Maturation • Instrumentation

  19. O1 O2 O3 O4 X O5 O6 O7 O8 O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 Interrupted Time-Series Design • How to control for history threats? • Frequent measurement intervals • Comparison group

  20. Interrupted Time-Series Design • How to control for history threats? • Frequent measurement intervals • Comparison group • Measure, treatment, measure, then “undo” the treatment, measure again • Not always feasible

  21. Small-N Designs • Single-subject or very few subjects • Why use? • Sample may exhaust the population • A single negative refutes a theory • Participant may be extremely rare • Research is time consuming, expensive, requires lots of training • How is this different from a case study?

  22. Small-N Designs • Behavior of the individual must be shown to change as a result of treatment • Characteristics: • Repeated measures • Baseline measurement • Change one variable at a time

  23. Small-N Designs • A-B design • Problems? • A-B-A design • Problems? • A-B-A-B design

More Related