1 / 25

Discipline: A little informed action can make your job and sleep a lot better

Training goals. De-mystify employee discipline; HR's

Gabriel
Télécharger la présentation

Discipline: A little informed action can make your job and sleep a lot better

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Discipline: A little informed action can make your job (and sleep) a lot better May 17, 2010 Stephen Smith, VPHR&LA With thanks to Jim Tuttle, Lee Lambert, and AAG Mitch Sachs

    3. Four mistakes managers make when disciplining employees

    4. Mistake no. 1

    5. Mistake no. 2

    6. Mistake no. 3

    7. Mistake no. 4

    8. Discipline in general

    9. Discipline in general (cont.)

    10. Discipline in general (cont.)

    11. Progressive discipline

    12. Progressive discipline overview (cont.)

    13. Progressive discipline overview (cont.)

    14. Progressive discipline overview (cont.)

    15. Types of misconduct subject to discipline (Pers. Apps. Bd. cases) Abuse of fellow employees Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude [inherent baseness, depravity] Excessive tardiness or absenteeism Gross misconduct Incompetence Indolence

    16. Types of misconduct subject to discipline (PAB cases)(cont.) Inefficiency Insubordination Malfeasance (wrongful conduct by a public officer or in an official role) Neglect of duty Willful violation of published employer rules or regulations Violation of policy

    17. Misconduct subject to discipline- collective bargaining agreements WFSE/ HE (classified): No discipline without just cause (29.1) Work nexus required if discipline based on off-duty activities (28.2) SCCFT (faculty): Corrective action shall be progressive and for sufficient cause (Art. XII) Dismissal only after corrective action and for specified sufficient cause (Art. IX.C)

    18. Disciplinary procedures- collective bargaining agreements-1 WFSE/ HE (classified): Must protect employee privacy (29.3) Right to request union representative at investigatory interview or pre-disciplinary meeting (29.5) Notice & response opportunity before discipline, except reprimands (29.7) Discipline may be grieved (29.9) & usually then arbitrated by AAA (30)

    19. Disciplinary procedures- collective bargaining agreements-2 SCCFT (faculty): Most discipline grievable and subject to arbitration by AAA (Art. XV) Notice and response opportunity before any action re dismissal (Art. IX.D.1) Dismissal hearing before faculty-majority review committee; final decision on dismissal by Board of Trustees (Art. XI)

    20. Disciplinary procedures Unrepresented classified & exempt Unrepresented classified: WAC 357-40; Personnel Resources Board Administrative exempt employees: individual employment contracts Non-renewal not a panacea (possible claims of discrimination, retaliation, violation of public policy, etc.)

    21. (1) Corrective action v. (2) Formal discipline Corrective action: where progressive starts Informal? Not appealable? Formal discipline: when corrective action hasnt worked Employee loses pay Subject to grievance and arbitration

    22. Distinguish: Correcting vs. Counseling Correcting is an FYI factual review of a perrmance issue or concern, to ensure the employee understands what they did was not acceptable. Corrective Counseling is more than that, an expression of dissatisfaction with specific performance

    23. (1) Corrective actionstypes (AGO) Oral reprimandexplanation, expectation, warning (recorded) Written corrective action plan-explanation, action(s), warning, acknowledged/ signed Memo of concern/ counselingnot quite a reprimand Written reprimandpersonnel file, grievable by represented employees

    24. Oral/ verbal reprimand

    26. Corrective action writings

    27. Corrective action plan (1 of 2)

    28. Corrective action plan (2 of 2)

    29. Investigationsgenerally Goal: Discover all relevant information through a fair process Must be prompt Scope must be appropriate to concern/ allegations, yet thorough Must be objective: Who, What, Where, When, Why & How

    30. Investigationssteps (1 of 2) Define issue(s)not just fishing Identify potential witnesses/ sequence, available documents and evidence Evidence can be verbal, written, and/or physical; cf. demonstrative Favorite trick: request drawing of a map Witness interviews: plan key questions, use of documents; listen!

    31. Investigationssteps (2 of 2) Records of interviews: notes, written/ signed statements, recordings? Interview admonitions: NO retaliation KNOWN un-confidentiality??? Report: just facts/ findings (no opinions) Consult with HR? (Role of HR)

    32. Pre-discipline notice & conference

    33. Pre-discipline conference (cont.)

    34. (2) Disciplinary action--letter From appointing authority, signed Summarize progressive discipline history (or justification for skipping) but avoid double discipline Specify misconduct; attach documentation? Usually at least 15 days prior to effective date for pay reduction, demotion, or dismissal Notice of right to grieve or appeal

    35. Formal discipline--types 1A. Suspension15/30 day limits? 1B. Reduction in salarylower step in same range for specified time 2. Demotionto different position with lesser salary range 3. Dismissalas follow-up or for extremes 4. Immediate dismissalgood of the service

    36. Suspension

    37. Termination

    38. Review Standard: Just Cause (1,2 of 7) 1. Did the employer put the employee on notice of the possible or likely disciplinary consequences of the employees conduct? 2. Was the employers rule reasonably related to the operation of the employers business?

    39. Review Standard: Just Cause (3-5 of 7) 3. Did the employer, prior to imposing discipline, determine whether the employee violated or disobeyed an employer rule or the employers expectations? 4. Was there an investigation or fact-finding? 5. Did the employer obtain substantial evidence or proof?

    40. Review Standard: Just Cause (6-7 of 7) 6. Has the employer applied the rules consistently to other employees? 7. Was the discipline reasonably related to the seriousness of the employees proven offense?

    41. Lees Golden Rule

    42. Golden Rule (cont.)

    43. Golden Rule (cont.)

    44. Conclusion Employee discipline de-mystified: Progressive discipline: correction action plus, if necessary, formal discipline Just Cause Fairness General principles and issue-spotting are the keys. (You can look up specifics, or call HR.)

More Related