1 / 21

Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum

Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum. Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott, Nathan Schwadron, and Ruedi von Steiger. Ulysses’ Three Polar Orbits.

Gideon
Télécharger la présentation

Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Weaker Solar WindOver the ProtractedSolar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott, Nathan Schwadron, and Ruedi von Steiger

  2. Ulysses’ Three Polar Orbits

  3. Comparison of SWOOPS SW plasma data from Ulysses’ 1st and 3rd (Solar Minimum) Orbits McComas et al., GRL, 2008

  4. SWOOPS first and third orbits (> 40°) • Parameter <1st> <3rd><3rd>-<1st> • <1st> • vp (km s-1) 761 739 -3% • vα (km s-1) 772 746 -3% • npR2 (cm-3) 2.65 2.19 -17% • nαR2 (cm-3) 0.12 0.10 -17% • TpR x105 (K) 2.66 2.30 -14% • Mass Flux (kg m-2 s-1) • ρiviR2 x10-15 3.96 3.17 -20% • Dynamic Pressure (nPa) • ρivi2R2 3.01 2.34 -22% • Proton Thermal Pressure (pPa) • npkTpR3 9.89 7.43 -25% • Alpha to proton ratio, nα/np 0.044 0.044 ----- • Long term reduction in pressure inflating Heliosphere McComas et al., GRL, 2008

  5. Heating in Subsonic Region • Nearly all of the energy of the solar wind is carried off in the form of bulk flow energy  excellent measure of the average energy being introduced in the corona, which ultimately accelerates the solar wind • Leer and Holzer [1980] developed a simple model to examine the effects of solar wind energization by heating and momentum addition • addition of energy above the sonic point primarily increases the wind speed • addition of energy below the sonic point increases the mass and momentum flux roughly comparably, leading to little change in wind speed  higher density McComas et al., GRL, 2008

  6. Ulysses (black) compared to ACE (red)Shows that reduction in SW power is truly global phenomenon McComas et al., GRL, 2008

  7. Electron Properties • Electron density and temperature deduced using quasi-thermal noise spectroscopy • Compared 3rd orbit PCH data with 1st orbit ~19% less dense (confirms SWOOPS ~17% lower protons and alphas) ~13% lower electron temperature (similar to SWOOPS ~14% lower proton temperature) Issautier et al., GRL, 2008

  8. IMF 1st vs 3rd Orbits (Ulysses) Smith and Balogh, GRL, 2008

  9. IMF Observations • Earth-based magnetograph observations indicated that the Sun’s polar cap field strength, Bp, decreased by a factor of about two between 1st and 3rd polar passes • Ulysses measurements show that the average value of r**2 Br decreased from • 3.6 nT (AU)**2 in 1993.5 to 1995.0 • 2.3 nT (AU)**2 in 2006.1 to 2007.4 • Decreased by factor of 0.64, but not precisely at minimum • Averages of in-ecliptic Br at the two solar minima are 2.82 and 2.45 nT (13% reduction) • Decreases contrary to observation based on previous solar cycles that Br returns to the same value of ~3 nT at solar minima Smith and Balogh, GRL, 2008

  10. Magnetic Field Fluctuations Decreased Smith and Balogh, GRL, 2008

  11. THE SOLAR WIND POWER FROM MAGNETIC FLUX • Reduction in high latitude fast SW power in Ulysses 3rd orbit compared to 1st correlates with reduction in Sun’s total open magnetic flux • These observations support models of the SW energy and particle sources (Schwadron & McComas, 2003; Schwadron et al., 2006) • Constant electromagnetic energy input per particle (assumed) • Magnetic flux emergence naturally leads to an energy flux proportional to the strength of large-scale magnetic field Schwadron and McComas, ApJ, 2008

  12. Solar wind mass flux vs.magnetic flux density Sun delivers ∼600 kW/Wb to power the solar windThis power to magnetic flux relation extremely stable over Ulysses’ three polar orbits Schwadron and McComas, ApJ, 2008

  13. SW Power inAstrophysical context SW observation in context of X-ray results of Pevtsov et al., 2003Black line is 600 kW / Wb as shown in previous plotRed line shows the power X-ray luminosity of ~1% of total SW power (Schwadron et al. 2006) Schwadron and McComas, ApJ, 2008

  14. So what has happened in the solar wind since 2007(2008 publications) ???

  15. Not 2007 – 2010!

  16. Solar Minimum has Extended

  17. Recent Data (and end of Ulysses)

  18. Ram Pressure of typically ~3 nPa Down by a Factor of ~2

  19. OMNI - CMEs Removed

  20. Summary • Ulysses’ 3rd orbit showed fast SW was slightly slower, significantly less dense, cooler, had less m, p, and E flux and weaker IMF than previous solar minimum (first) orbit • Combined ACE/Ulysses show that this is a significant, long-term change in SW output from the entire Sun • Similar SW speeds with lower power indicates SW energy fed in below the sonic point • Charge states indicate coronal temperatures lower • Significant, long-term trend to lower dynamic pressure  Heliosphere has been shrinking (Voyager & IBEX) • Same law that governs energy released in the corona and from other stars also applies to the total energy in the solar wind • Decreasing SW power has continued through 2009 approaching ~1.5 compared to ~3 pPa 20 years ago

More Related