1 / 13

Navy Enterprise Business Process & Functional Area Management

Navy Enterprise Business Process & Functional Area Management. Captain Sandra T. Buckles OPNAV CIO Sandra.buckles@navy.mil. Designing Navy Business Processes to leverage Horizontal integration of information & decision making Capitalizing on Enterprise Network Services of NMCI

MikeCarlo
Télécharger la présentation

Navy Enterprise Business Process & Functional Area Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Navy Enterprise Business Process & Functional Area Management Captain Sandra T. Buckles OPNAV CIO Sandra.buckles@navy.mil

  2. Designing Navy Business Processes to leverage Horizontal integration of information & decision making Capitalizing on Enterprise Network Services of NMCI Define & preserve our decision making authority Navy Enterprise Business Process

  3. Purpose: Compare current and future business function opportunities to current applications Goal: Improve Business Processes Right mix of supporting technology Streamline quantity of applications Reduce cost of supporting Future Navy Business Functional Area Management

  4. Navy divided up functional areas into 24 groups Large FAMs – Cross other Functional Areas Acquisition, Administration, Logistics, Science & Tech, Enterprise Services, Education & Training Small FAMs – All the rest C3, Civpers, Finance, IW, Intel & Cryp, Legal, Manpower & Pers, Medical, Meteorology, Mod & Sim, Nuclear Propulsion, Reserve, Precise Time, Readiness, Religious Ministries, Resources/Requirements & Assessments, Test & Eval, and Weapons Planning & Control Only reviewed NMCI Applications Future consideration of IT-21, BLII, others FAM - Background

  5. Short Term: Collect apps and begin categorization Mid-Term: Consolidate/Map applications to Navy Processes driven Taxonomy End Goal: Portfolio Management Portfolio management versus streamlined applications using portfolio management disciplines Functional Area ManagementRationalization Process

  6. Determined Applications In Use Created Taxonomies Developed and Implemented Rationalization Process Cleaned Up Application Database 37,287 3,821 Allowed with restriction 6,971 3,150 Preferred FAM Application RationalizationPhases – NMCI Apps only Migration Planning Short Term Mid Term 6,971 3,821 Goal 3,150 Preferred Jun 03 Jan 03 Dec 02 May 02 May 03 • Questionnaires complete • Scorecarding complete • Determine approved (preferred) applications • Determine Allowed with restriction • Determine COTS candidates for enterprise licensing • List GOTS server apps for server consolidation & migration to NMCI • Develop Migration Process • BCAs • Rebuild apps • BPRs • Integration across functional areas • Discard applications no longer required

  7. Near Term (Short Term) Started with over 60K Applications Initial reduction due to duplications, spelling differences, versions, etc. Mid-Term Target reduce portfolio to 5% of our starting point Current Reduced the list by 90% Just over 3K apps FAM Application ReviewProgress – Near and Mid Phase

  8. In-depth review of Business Functions to Application Development of Business Cases Process Improvements Applications mapped to Taxonomy (Biz Process) Compare taxonomy to applications: Ensures all functions/processes are supported by an application Don’t create a disconnect between functions Does the Taxonomy truly define our Business Processes Looking for Business Best Practices/Models FAM Application ReviewFuture Steps

  9. Compare current taxonomy (Business Process) to applications In-depth Process Reviews Step by step work flow review Pilot locations selected to conduct mission impact Process Improvements to leverage NMCI NMCI provides new infrastructure NMCI capabilities provide advantage to meet Navy Mission Reduce the # of applications Return to an Enterprise Network FAMs & Process Improvement

  10. Compare taxonomy (Business Process) to applications In-depth Process Reviews Echelons 1 through 7 Step by step work flow review Process differences between Echelon 1 and Echelon 7 Further define Admin functional area FMMP (BMMP) domain was initial guide Is it the right one for Navy What does Industry use Portfolio Management Looking for tools to facilitate migration More than migration – looking for Process Improvements FAMs & Process ImprovementAdministration

  11. Streamlined ability to meet mission Common/repeatable processes across Navy Standardized applications/data repositories Data Integration across authoritative data sources Enterprise licensing Process Improvement End Goal

  12. Industry best practices Proven, like processes that can be ported to Navy Pilot efforts that industry has completed Navy wants to adapt proven cost efficient business processes FAM & Industry Support

  13. Questions??? Captain Sandra Buckles, OPNAV CIO 703-602-5130 Sandra.buckles@navy.mil

More Related