1 / 5

Review of the Ripple XRP Case possibilities by Mount Equity Group for 2022

Security tokens are bonds and stocks in digital format, and itu2019s becoming a crypto buzzword. Fintech industry analysts and executives see such tokens as cryptocurrency space reinvigoration and development essential in future endeavors. Experts say that the critical difference between security tokens and other cryptocurrencies is falling within regulatory parameters and asset backing.

Mount1
Télécharger la présentation

Review of the Ripple XRP Case possibilities by Mount Equity Group for 2022

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MOUNT EQUITY GROUP TOKYO REVIEW Review of the Ripple XRP Case possibilities by Mount Equity Group for 2022

  2. Although blockchain technology and digital currency are extremely popular right now, the financial technology sector has seen better times due to ongoing legal and regulatory conflicts. In this Mount Equity Group Review, we'll discuss the case possibilities for Ripple XRP and the consequences after 2022. So far, XRP versus SEC With the use of Deliberative Process Privilege (DPP) in the Ripple v. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) case, the US government has launched numerous attacks against the

  3. cryptocurrency industry in recent years. Despite three fixes, the problem has persisted for more than a year, upsetting the Fintech community. Judge Netburn instructed the SEC to turn over other internal XRP, Ethereum, and Bitcoin documents as further proof for greater context. On May 6, 2021, the SEC submitted a further motion requesting clarification and a review of the standards. A second XRP motion was filed on August 10 with the SEC insisting on DPP after the judge ordered the release of specific internal SEC records. Regarding the dispute with federal regulators over the security and registration of the digital asset XRP, they held another hearing on August 31, although the decision-making process lasted until January 13, 2022. XRP Legal Memos from 2012. According to Mount Equity Group Review, on February 18, 2022, recent court papers disclosed two legal memoranda from Perkins Coie LLP to Ripple about XRP tokens, dated February 2012, warning Ripple to avoid selling proposed currencies because to

  4. potential security and commodity difficulties. XRP might not technically be regarded as a security asset under current federal rules, but there was a chance that the SEC would disagree, according to another memo from the same company that was sent to Ripple in October 2012. Ripple carried on with its business despite the early legal counsel and notification. Perkins Coie LLP ended up being right about their insight. Eight years after that warning, the SEC sued the company along with Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Bradly Garlinghouse and co- founder Christian Larsen alleging that the two men sold the virtual tokens profiting around $600 million, disregarding the prior legal advice that XRP may be considered an investment contract or security asset. While the case is still ongoing, pending further investigation from the multiple parties involved, Mount Equity Group Review finds that the results and rulings of the XRP vs. SEC lawsuit could impact the entire Financial Technology sector and its various currencies. It could start a series of anti-crypto cases or modified security asset definitions to apply to other tokens moving forward.

  5. Bottomline The decentralised nature of blockchain and smart contracts is fought while this case aims to lead bitcoin regulation and security measures. It's possible to claim that because cryptocurrencies are merely money and shouldn't be governed by security asset decisions, this particular case has been taking a while. Even while other nations are more receptive of the Financial Technology sector generally, there are still disagreements about the industry's regulatory and legal implications for the Finance sector. If the US bans or accepts cryptocurrency, that will depend on time.

More Related