1 / 16

Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach

Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach. United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Samuel DeWitt Proctor Professor of Education, Emerita Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

Pat_Xavi
Télécharger la présentation

Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SupportingStriving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Samuel DeWitt Proctor Professor of Education, Emerita Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

  2. What Striving Readers & Writers Need -- An Overview A comprehensive and coordinated program of prevention and intervention across all levels and points of instruction and involvement: State LEA School/EC Center Classroom Striving Readers Program

  3. Key Components for consideration by subgrantees - 1. Articulation across all levels of education - birth through high school 2. Special/new emphasis on early literacy development 3. Family involvement at the earliest levels and beyond

  4. Key Componentscontinued - 4. Differentiated instruction - includes careful planning to organize and teach targeted populations (ex. struggling learners, English learners, students with disabilities); knowledge of and respect for cultural and linguistic diversity 5. Articulation between SR Program, regular education (language arts & content area teachers), and other specialized instructional programs and specialized staff

  5. Key Componentscontinued - 6. Assessment - (1) to screen for potential problems; (2) to inform instructional decisions - includes formative with links to summative; specific plans for collection, analysis, and use of data (work samples as well as quantitative data); summative assessments of students; (3) to evaluate overall program success- includes formative with documentation and explanation for adaptations and summative data. 7. Strategic use of media technology

  6. Key Componentscontinued - - 8. Ongoing professional development 9. Links to national, state, and local professional organizations and relevant agencies 10. Makes use of reputable sources of evidence to inform proposal

  7. SomeState Level responsibilities - >Use Key Components to guide, review, and evaluate proposed plans >Guide, monitor, and assess effective implementation of selected proposals >Establish and coordinate efforts of a State Literacy Team; a State Advisory Council on Early Childhood Education and Care >Provide leadership in linking LEAs with relevant organizations and agencies to encourage collaboration, mutual support, dissemination, replication

  8. SomeDistrict Level responsibilities - Special focus on sustainability -- >Provide leadership and support for SR program with attention to linking standards, curriculum, instruction, and assessment in regular programs with Striving Readers initiative. >Provide leadership at district level in linking staff with statewide related efforts, relevant organizations and community-based agencies. Encourage collaboration, mutual support, dissemination, replication.

  9. SomeSchool Level responsibilities - Special focus on sustainability >Provide leadership and support for linking standards, curriculum, instruction in existing programs with Striving Readers program >Support school-wide organization that coordinates and supports SR program efforts (ex. time allocation; staff, etc.) - SR program should support not supplant special efforts in the regular classroom - Avoid fragmentation >Support integrated curricula; collaborative planning by language arts and content area teachers >Support professional development for ALL involved - with focus on building whole school capacity

  10. Working Together!!Early Childhood EducationGrade-level (K-12) Classroom InstructionStriving Readers Programs A synergistic view -- >Based on Principles of Developmentally Appropriate Practice (grounded in child and adolescent development) >Engaging - cognitively & behaviorally (of interest and importance to children) >Scaffolded (1) teacher models; (2) teacher collaborates with children; (3) children work independently

  11. A synergistic view -- -cont. >Differentiated - both organizationally and instructionally for specific needs (ex. English Learners, struggling learners); materials (including technology); intensity and duration) >Explicit with opportunities for Planful, Indirect Follow-up (both are focused and engaging) >Planned program of formative assessment - includes systematic collection of data; record keeping; analysis, and evidence of use of data to inform instruction >Integration of English Language Arts with the Content Areas

  12. Some Cautionary Notes Re: typical components of many intervention programs Extended Time - key elements to consider >Careful design and implementation >Use of appropriately difficult texts >Focused and personalized expert instruction >Substantial opportunities to read and write

  13. Some Cautionary NotesRe: typical components of many intervention programs Specialized Staff- some things to consider >Appropriate selection >Shared understanding of’ roles >Appropriate use of time; effort

  14. Some Cautionary NotesRe: typical components of many intervention programs Tutoring - some things to consider >Training and Supervision >Consistency of effort >Coordination with regular program >Progress Monitoring

  15. Some Cautionary NotesRe: typical components of many intervention programs Technology - some things to consider >Should address established needs >Should complement/support existing curriculum >Requires professional development

  16. A Final Cautionary Note Perhaps The Most Important Ingredient - Professional Development Key components of Effective Professional Development >Stresses both the theoretical (why) and the practical (what) >Is collaborative >Is long term; embedded (linked to instruction) >Involves all related school personnel >Promotes active involvement/application >Promotes shared leadership

More Related