1 / 44

Accounting for Printing

Accounting for Printing. and the Cornell Net-Print Service. Who am I?. Rick Cochran Cornell Information Technologies Systems & Operations Designated Services Cornell Physics ’71 Manager of the Research Computing Facilities of the Cornell Center for Materials Research for c. 20 years

Samuel
Télécharger la présentation

Accounting for Printing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Accounting for Printing and the Cornell Net-Print Service

  2. Who am I? • Rick Cochran • Cornell Information Technologies • Systems & Operations • Designated Services • Cornell Physics ’71 • Manager of the Research Computing Facilities of the Cornell Center for Materials Research for c. 20 years • Included printer accounting • Joined CIT as software developer for Net-Print in 1998

  3. Road map • The Cornell Net-Print Service – how we do printer accounting at Cornell • Printer accounting philosophy and decision making • Challenges • Future Possibilities • Demos • Questions

  4. The Cornell Net-Print Service How we do it

  5. Net-Print: Non-technical details • Started in 1996 • Laurie Collinsworth and Mike Hojnowski (design and coding) • Carrie Regenstein (politics) • Student labor (coding) • Cornell has no central funding model • Printing allocations must be done on a per-department basis • Students must be able to have multiple printing accounts • Net-Print must be fully cost-recovered • Originally developed for CIT student labs • Extended to departmental “Partner Labs” • The department buys and maintains their own printers and supplies • We do the authentication, print serving, page counting, accounting, and billing • We return 78% of the funds we collect for printing on the department’s printers to the department • The “Hojnowski” effect • You don’t want to be the last lab still offering free printing

  6. CIT Student Lab CIT Student Lab Departmental Partner Lab Departmental Partner Lab Net-Print: Functional diagram Anywhere Dorm room

  7. Net-Print: Technical Details • Spooler: LPRng (http://www.lprng.com) • Database: MySQL • About 1.2GB • Server: IBM Power PC/AIX • Moving to Opteron/Linux soon • Development language: Perl • c. 21k lines • Web server: Apache • CGI

  8. Net-Print: Authentication methods • MacOS X and Unix: LPRng Kerberized LPR protocol • CUPS backend • CUPS Printing Dialog Extension (PDE) for MacOS X • Thanks to NCSU! • Windows: Sidecar - Cornell’s Kerberos authentication scheme • Protocol-independent, out-of-band, call-back, Kerberos authentication method • Workstation sends print job to server • Server does call-back to Sidecar process on workstation to get user’s Kerberos credentials

  9. Net-Print: We are Green • Charging for printing is inherently green • The Net-Print Service will print c. 8 million pages this year – which is about 24 million pages less than would be printed if we were not charging for printing. • That’s about 1,880 trees this year! • Watermark alternative to banner pages • About 100 trees this year! • 100% recycled paper (in CIT Labs) • Duplex printing

  10. Net-Print: Growth

  11. Net-Print: Printing History

  12. Billing examples – April ‘05 • Bursar billing • $117,153 • 8,699 students • $13.47 average • Department Account billing • $1,330 • Course Account billing • $14,521 • Disbursement to Partner Labs • $55,581

  13. Printer accounting philosophy and decision making

  14. Why Charge for Printing? • Because you have to: Printer supply costs will bankrupt you • Charging for printing is the only effective way to make a brain cell fire before someone pushes the “print” button • To reduce usage of natural resources • Environmental awareness is becoming increasingly important • To cover the cost of quality equipment • Quality printers • Color printers • Specialty printers (poster, etc.) • Printer maintenance contracts to make sure that the printers are actually working

  15. Why Not Charge for Printing? • You will be placing yourself between the user and their output • Not comfortable • Page counting is complex • Students are clever • Accounting and billing are complex and expensive

  16. Why Not Charge for Printing? • Refund processing is aggravating • Printing errors are often caused by the user or the application – not the service • You will get weary of listening to excuses • “Somebody else must have printed on my account” • “It never printed” (when you know it did) • “The printing system ate my homework” • Requires a lot of resources (staff, technology, etc.)

  17. How does your institution work? • Is there a central funding model which can be used to provide students with printing allocations? • This determines how obsessive you need to be about page counting accuracy, refunds, etc. • Is there a strong central IT authority? • This determines whether you can dictate client platforms, printer types, etc.

  18. Commercial or in-house • Will a commercial package be flexible enough to meet your institution’s and customers’ needs? • Multiple accounts per user • A networked authentication solution is more convenient for your users than a commercial “money card” or “release station” solution • Do you have the resources to build and maintain an in-house solution?

  19. Client platforms • Which ones to support? • Windows (9X, ME, XP) • MacOS X • Unix • We support Windows XP and MacOS X officially, and Unix unofficially • Single platform is simpler (but less fun!)

  20. Authentication • Not necessary with “money card” solution • Kerberos, LDAP, Active Directory, NDS, PKI • Things to authenticate • Printing • Windows (“login” or “share”) • Custom • Web pages (signup, account management, job management)

  21. Authorization • Who is authorized to • Print • Move or delete print jobs • Submit refund requests • Start or stop print queues • View people’s printing and accounting logs • Add or remove print queues • Create, remove, or modify accounts • Create, remove, or modify people’s authorization • Roles: end user, operator, manager, etc.

  22. Network printing protocols • Client to server • SMB, LPR, IPP • We use SMB and LPR • Windows LPR implementation is flawed • “Push” bits in TCP reduce throughput • Server to printer • LPR, IPP, App socket (port 9100) • We use port 9100 because it’s simpler and bi-directional, but it has problems with Binary PostScript

  23. Server architecture • Central (simpler) or distributed (scales better) • Hardware and software platform

  24. Page counting • Software (on client or server) • Less accurate (assumes the job printed OK) • Requires more CPU resources • Hardware (read the printer’s page counter) • More accurate • Delay between print jobs • Requires printer-dependent code • Requires printer lockdown • IP address restrictions to prevent circumvention of the printing system

  25. Page Description Languages (PDLs) • PostScript • Preferred by professionals • The PostScript Printer Description (PPD) spec provides device-independent support for printer features • Printers without licensed Adobe PostScript engines (HP, Lexmark) may have problems printing documents generated by Adobe applications • PCL • Less problems printing Adobe documents • Limited feature control at the server end • We require PostScript • The “watermark” alternative to banner pages is impossible to implement with PCL

  26. Printer monitoring and security • Printer lockdown requires setting and monitoring printer parameters • Anyone with physical access to the printer can re-configure it • Passwords are required to prevent tampering via the network (near and far) • Vendor-supplied solutions • Lack functionality (printing or exporting data!) • Don’t support other vendors’ printers well • Usually require Windows servers • Are designed to look good in demos so that • You will buy their printers, and • You will buy their printing supplies

  27. Banner pages • It’s important to separate print jobs and identify their owners • Average job size = 4.8 pages waste 17% of paper • Alternative: “watermark” at top of first page of output • User-selectable (default is “watermark”) • Possible only with PostScript

  28. Where are the costs? • It’s not the paper!

  29. Accounting • Real-time vs. batch • Web interface • Types of accounts • Credit (unlimited, billed monthly) • Bursar • Department • Debit (disallow printing when limit is reached) • Cash • Credit card (pre-paid on-line) • Course (allocated by student’s department) • Authorization • Bursar billing eligibility feed • Department account

  30. Refund Processing • Reasons for refunds • Printer failures • Toner outages, printer jams, etc. • Configuration failures • Binary PostScript • Application failures • Page selection in Word • User failures • Blank pages in Excel spreadsheets (record: 969!) • Wrong Web “frame” active • Wanted “6-up” in Powerpoint • Somebody else picked up the output • Forgot to log out • You name it • Only the first category above is the “fault” of the printing service! • We grant refunds for all but “forgot to log out”

  31. Refund Processing (cont.) • If you’re going to offer refunds, the process must be automated • Labor intensive • You need to make sure that all refund requests correspond to actual charges! • Logs and statistics are helpful • For resolving disputes • For determining systematic printing problems

  32. Refund processing (cont.)

  33. Billing • Bursar feed • Department account feed • Cash management • Security • Requires audit trail • Online credit card • Use a service (eg. VeriSign) which insulates you from liabilities • Billing reports • Who printed how much on this account • We send report spreadsheets as e-mail attachments

  34. Challenges

  35. Challenge - Authentication • Sidecar is going away • Sidecar is a protocol-independent, out-of-band, call-back, Kerberos authentication scheme • Hence it has inherent vulnerabilities (eg. with NATs) • We would like a Kerberized LPR (or other) protocol “port manager” for Windows. Please email rcc2@cornell.edu if you have one!

  36. Challenge - Duplex page counting • Sheets vs. sides (impressions) • Must charge about the same to print a given document duplexed as for simplexed (you save only 1/3 cent per document page) • The SNMP page counters in Lexmark, HP, and Xerox printers click twice for each duplex page • A three page document costs $.30 simplexed and $.40 duplexed • Xerox Phaser job accounting (to the rescue!) • Counts sheets and sides • Accessible via SNMP • Misbehaved Microsoft apps • IE, Word append a blank page when duplexing an odd number of pages – defeating our sophisticated page counting technology • We will document this and wait for Microsoft to fix it

  37. Challenge - Binary PostScript • Generated by default by some apps – notably Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, and Pagemaker • Advantage: Half as big as ASCII PostScript • Example: 100MB vs 200MB • When sent via port 9100 causes printers to spew many pages of gibberish • Can be fixed by encoding with TBCP • Works fine for Windows • The MacOS X spooler won’t TBCP encode Photoshop output. • Xerox Phaser printers may be able to deal with Binary PostScript if the port 9100 “filter” option is set to “none” • Needs more research

  38. Future Possibilities

  39. Future Possibilities • Charging by supply usage instead of by pages • Single printer for both B/W and color • Charges fairly for small vs. full-page images • But: the customer doesn’t get to know their charges in advance • Sell “Printing plans” (like cell phone plans) ??

  40. Future Possibilities • Multiple printers per queue: Load balancing • Current job prints on whichever printer is working/not busy • Resolves problems caused by long jobs and broken printers • Might confuse students: “Where did my output go?”

  41. Future Possibilities • Multiple queues per printer • Separate queues would reduce the confusion involved in choosing duplex or simplex printing • Separate queues would permit different charges for different media • Color printer tray 1 - paper at $.25 • Color printer tray 2 - transparency at $1.00

  42. Future Possibilities • FAX • Specialty printers • Printed card-stock front and back covers • Hot tape binding • Low cost

  43. Future Possibilities • Using a messaging service • Purpose: To inform users that . . . • Their account is empty • Their print job has just printed on printer xx • Currently using e-mail and a printed sheet for error messages • Must be authenticated to avoid spam and security issues

  44. Demos and Questions

More Related