1 / 22

ENGLAND NETBALL COMPETITION STRUCTURE

ENGLAND NETBALL COMPETITION STRUCTURE. Quality experience, accessible for all. England Netball wants: Better opportunity for more people Appropriate netball competition fitting with LTAD and player pathway To grow netball - club emphasis with school base

Sharon_Dale
Télécharger la présentation

ENGLAND NETBALL COMPETITION STRUCTURE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENGLAND NETBALLCOMPETITION STRUCTURE

  2. Quality experience, accessible for all England Netball wants: • Better opportunity for more people • Appropriate netball competition fitting with LTAD and player pathway • To grow netball - club emphasis with school base • Develop skills of young athlete, therefore need more clubs for them to go into so there is more appropriate competition • Further develop coach, umpires, officials, volunteers to support new structure

  3. LTAD Principles • Concerns with current sport systems: • Young athletes under-train & over-compete • Inappropriate competition schedule is superimposed on young athletes • 5 Reasons EN introduced LTAD: • Guide planning for optimal performance of athletes in order for England Netballers to be the best they can be • Eliminate gaps in the current Netball development pathway • Establish a clear Netball development pathway • Realign and integrate the programmes for developing Netball athletes and Netball in England • Provide a planning tool, based on scientific research and empirical evidence for coaches and administrators

  4. England NetballAthlete Development ModelIncorporating LTAD

  5. Change of focus from counties • Every child attends school, so we need to invest in schools competition framework • Sporting ethos towards club development; underpinned by Sport England Funding • EN Senior competition structure is clubs based, junior structure needs to mirror it • LTAD principles vital for young players to achieve their potential • County competition was too much on top of school & club • Aim for league competition with longer matches, rather than short tournament matches

  6. Senior Competition Structure Super League Premier Divisions 1 & 2 9 x Regional Leagues Area / County Leagues District / Local Leagues

  7. National Schools Competition Framework • September 2005 - 20 SSP with Competition Managers [not teacher], in 5 CSP, to facilitate running of sport competition • Netball is 1st year focus sport in all 20 SSP [all 31 sports have signed up to this] • Netball’s new structure reflects the national schools competition structure which is why it has been chosen as a pilot sport

  8. Primary Education • Emphasis on delivery of FUNdamental stage: • Ages 5 – 7: multiskill activity / festivals • Ages 7 – 9: multsikill / multisport activity / festivals • Ages 9 – 11: High Five netball leagues • Focus delivery on the state sector, through School Sport Partnerships to include Independent schools • Menu of options for delivery, and resource support • County Netball Coordinators / CSPs to support • High Five compulsory in clubs for CAPS accreditation

  9. Secondary Education • Principal objective: to ensure a high-quality, exciting and appropriate experience • Emphasis on: • Ongoing local competition, culminating in festivals or tournaments • Intra-school netball from Year 7 upwards • Retain 2 x National Schools tournaments, for Years 8 / 9 and Years 10 / 11 • Create a single National Under-18 tournament for schools, college and club teams

  10. Secondary Education

  11. Junior & Youth Club competition

  12. Academies/RTDP • Satellite and County academies to run in every county to provide individual training • Regional Talent Development Programme being set-up in each Region, as the next stage of talent development • RHS selects from nominations from academies/schools/clubs • Coaches/teachers attend PSW to nominate

  13. Talent Programme for Youth Aspiring for better competition and training for all players at all levels

  14. University & College Netball • As currently, through BUSA • England Netball to establish BUSA Sports Management Group to drive forward: • Support structures for university clubs, e.g., coaching, umpiring, leadership • Provision of competitive opportunities for players not selected for BUSA teams • Encouragement of intra-mural netball • Similarly with British Colleges Sports Association

  15. Implementation - timescales

  16. Organisation - by whom? • Schools • High 5 leagues/festivals • School leagues • Put schools forward for county round of National schools • Clubs • Play in local leagues • Can progress through: • county, regional/area, premier leagues • County Netball Association: • County round of National schools • County leagues (determine own structure)

  17. Organisation - by whom? • TSG (or separate region committees): • Regional round of National schools • Regional leagues (determine own structure) • Regional Talent Development Programme • Regional Screening Days (RHS and qualified coaches/teachers) • England Netball • Will produce guidelines on best practise by autumn 2005. Setting up National Group to decide - all regions having input

  18. Questions

  19. These next slides are for backup in case you get questions about them

  20. Club Development Model

  21. Franchises • Elite Competition • Home Training • Development of players, coaches & umpires • Junior elite teams aspiring to high level play

  22. Practical application • 10yr old- H5 in SSP league and/or club. • U14 county player in club competition & Academies for individual skills’ training • U16 player in club competition & Academy or RTDP • U18 player in open club competition or age group • Requires good club development within County & Region so good competition available • Good clubs – CAPS club – provide mentoring & support to develop other strong clubs to provide regular good competition. (Counties not always able to provide good competition at present)

More Related