1 / 20

Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium Bose Einstein Condensate

Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium Bose Einstein Condensate. Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers Université Paris Nord Villetaneuse - France. Quentin Beaufils, Gabriel Bismut, Paolo Pedri, Bruno Laburthe-Tolra, Etienne Maréchal, Laurent Vernac, Olivier Gorceix. Benjamin Pasquiou.

Sophia
Télécharger la présentation

Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium Bose Einstein Condensate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium Bose Einstein Condensate Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers Université Paris Nord Villetaneuse - France Quentin Beaufils, Gabriel Bismut, Paolo Pedri, Bruno Laburthe-Tolra, Etienne Maréchal, Laurent Vernac, Olivier Gorceix. Benjamin Pasquiou

  2. Chromium BEC : strong dipolar interactions • Chromium : S=3 in the ground state • Large magnetic dipole-dipole interactions • Long range (1/r3) • Anisotropic ( contrary to contact interactions) + - + + - - + - Large dipole-dipole interactions + No hyperfine interactions a useful system to study dipolar relaxation

  3. Chromium BEC : strong dipolar interactions • Collapse of a purely dipolar condensate T.Lahaye et al, PRL 101, 080401 (2008) • Tune scattering length using Feshbach resonances : dipolar interactions larger than contact interactions T.Lahaye et al, Nature. 448, 672 (2007) • Effect of dipole-dipole interactions : collisions with change of total magnetization gain of angular momentum

  4. Outline • I) All optical condensation of 52Cr. • II) Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium BEC

  5. 7P4 7P3 650 nm 425 nm 5S,D 427 nm 7S3 I) 1 - Overview of the production of a Cr BEC • An atom: 52Cr • An oven • A Zeeman slower • A small MOT Oven at 1500 °C N = 4.106 • A dipole trap • A BEC every 15 s • All optical evaporation • A crossed dipole trap

  6. 7P4 7P3 650 nm 425 nm 5S,D 427 nm 7S3 I) 2 - Cr Magneto-optical traps • An atom: 52Cr • An oven • A Zeeman slower • A small MOT N = only 4.106 bosons! Loading rate = 3.5 108 atoms/s N = 4.106 Inelastic light assisted collisions (dominant process) 2 to 3 orders of magnitude larger than in alkalis R. Chicireanu et al. Phys. Rev. A 73, 053406 (2006) • A dipole trap • A BEC every 15 s • All optical evaporation • A crossed dipole trap

  7. I) 3 - Accumulation of metastable atoms in an ODT • An atom: 52Cr • An oven • A Zeeman slower • A small MOT • IPG fiberized laser - 50W @ 1075 nm • Horizontal beam - waist ≈ 40 µm 7P4 5D4 425nm N = 4.106 Accumulation of metastable atoms in the Optical Dipole Trap (ODT). These atoms are shielded from light assisted collisions. 7S3 R Chicireanu et al., Euro Phys J D 45, 189 (2007) • A dipole trap • A BEC every 15 s • All optical evaporation • A crossed dipole trap

  8. What for : Load all magnetic sublevels How : During loading of the OT, magnetic forces are averaged out by rapidly spin flipping the atoms RF Sweep 7P4 m<0 m>0 7P3 654nm 425nm 633nm 663nm 427nm 5S2 7S3 Plus two major improvements : (i) Cancel magnetic forces with an rf field • (i)*(ii) Load 5D4 et 5S2 and rf sweeps : • 5 to 6 million atoms in the single beam ODT (1075 nm, 35 W) • More than in the MOT! • Loading time : 100 ms • Temperature : 100 µK. RF Sweeps : 2 million atoms Q. Beaufils et al., Phys. Rev. A 77, 053413 (2008) (ii) Depump towards metastable state : 5S2 • Whatweexpect : • A lowerinelasticlossparameter ? • A largerloading rate ? Load 5D4 et 5D3 : 1.2 million atoms

  9. 7P4 7P3 650 nm 425 nm 5S,D 427 nm 7S3 I) 4 - Evaporative cooling and Chromium BEC • An atom: 52Cr • An oven • A Zeeman slower • A small MOT • Atoms back in the ground state, in the lowest energy Zeeman state m = -3 • 15 seconds evaporation ramp Pure BEC: 10 000 to 20 000 atoms In situ TF radii : 4 and 5 µm Density : 6.1013 atoms/cm3- 2.1014 atoms/cm3 Condensates lifetime : a few seconds. Chemical potentential : about 1 kHz - 4 kHz Q.Beaufils et al., Phys. Rev. A 77, 061601(R) (2008) • A dipole trap • A BEC every 15 s • All optical evaporation • A crossed dipole trap

  10. Outline • I) All optical condensation of 52Cr • II) Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium BEC

  11. II) 1 – Dipolar relaxation What is dipolar relaxation ? Not seen in Rb BEC (negligible) Only two channels for dipolar relaxation in m = 3 (no relaxation in m = -3) : ΔmS = -1 ΔmS = -2 The kinetic energy gain makes the atoms leave the trap Our BEC is in m = -3 Zeeman substate Change to m = +3 to see dipolar relaxation use of rf sweep We observe dipolar relaxation

  12. II) 2 – Experimental procedure • Experimental procedure Static magnetic field Rf sweep 2 Rf sweep 1 Produce BEC m = -3 BEC m = +3, varying time detect BEC m = -3 • Typical results In a BEC : Atom number two-body collision rate Time (ms) Fit gives β BEC lost

  13. II) 2 – Comparison theory - experiment It has been shown (S.Hensler, Appl. Phys. B, 77, 765 (2003)) that the Born approximation is valid for B < 1G and B > 10 G… not in between ! Born approximation predictions (BEC) • BEC m = +3 measurements Two body loss parameter 1013 cm3/s-1 Magnetic field (G)

  14. II) 2 – Comparison theory - experiment It has been shown (S.Hensler, Appl. Phys. B, 77, 765 (2003)) that the Born approximation is valid for B < 1G and B > 10 G… not in between ! Born approximation predictions (BEC) • BEC m = +3 measurements Born approximation predictions (thermal gas) Thermal gas 5 µK measurements Two body loss parameter 1013 cm3/s-1 Magnetic field (G)

  15. II) 2 – Comparison theory - experiment It has been shown (S.Hensler, Appl. Phys. B, 77, 765 (2003)) that the Born approximation is valid for B < 1G and B > 10 G… not in between ! Born approximation predictions (BEC) • BEC m = +3 measurements First theoretical calculations (A. Crubellier) Born approximation predictions (thermal gas) Thermal gas 5 µK measurements Two body loss parameter 1013 cm3/s-1 Magnetic field (G)

  16. II) 3 – Interpretation Avoided crossing gap ≈ Vdd Interparticle distance l = 0 E = gJ µB B Interatomic potentials l = 2 aS Interparticle distance = as Zero coupling Determination of scattering lengths S=6 and S=4 (in progress, Anne Crubellier)

  17. Summary All opticalproduction of a chromium BEC. Observation of the evolution of dipolar relaxationin a thermal gas and a BEC, with a static magnetic field. Good agreement with Born approximation, but observation of a reduction of dipolar relaxationfor a range of field. Discrepancy due to a zero couplingbetween input and output channel.

  18. Otherwork on dipolar relaxation Rf sweep 2 Rf sweep 1 • Dipolar relaxation in reduced dimensions 1D Lattice (retro-reflected Verdi laser) Produce BEC m = -3 BEC m = +3, varying time detect BEC m = -3 Static magnetic field Load optical lattice Cr BEC diffracted by lattice • Control of dipolar relaxation with strong rf field We observe experimentally and caracterize rf assisted dipolar relaxation, in presence of a strong off-resonance rf magnetic field

  19. Future Optical lattices– dipolar gases in reduced dimensions. Feshbach resonances– pure dipolar gases. Fermions – degenerate Fermi sea of polarized atoms with dipole-dipole interactions.

  20. P. Pedri G. Bismut L. Vernac B. Pasquiou Q. Beaufils O. Gorceix E. Maréchal J. C. Keller B. Laburthe Have left: T. Zanon, R. Barbé, A. Pouderous, R. Chicireanu Collaboration:Anne Crubellier (Laboratoire Aimé Cotton)

More Related