1 / 12

Presented by: Nakia Williams, Jennice Pamilton, Fatima Coley, and Elisabeth Hopkins

“Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is It Still Relevant for the 1990s?” Article by: Mark H. Freeston and Michel Plechaty. Presented by: Nakia Williams, Jennice Pamilton, Fatima Coley, and Elisabeth Hopkins. History of the Test. Widely used over last 30 years

Sophia
Télécharger la présentation

Presented by: Nakia Williams, Jennice Pamilton, Fatima Coley, and Elisabeth Hopkins

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is It Still Relevant for the 1990s?”Article by: Mark H. Freeston and Michel Plechaty Presented by: Nakia Williams, Jennice Pamilton, Fatima Coley, and Elisabeth Hopkins

  2. History of the Test • Widely used over last 30 years • 15 items • General satisfaction, agreement/disagreement on certain issues, relationship style • Recently been criticized (last 20 years) Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  3. Purpose of this Review To examine: • Reliability and Validity • Factor analysis • Item analyses • Cutting-score validation • Separate analyses of men and women (generalizability) Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  4. Subjects Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  5. Methods • Each group received a package containing a demographic data questionnaire, the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test (LWMAT), and other relationship questionnaires • All groups were required to take the LWMAT • Participants’ scores on the LWMAT were used to analyze the test Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  6. Results • Adequate reliability: men and women • Adequate test-retest stability • Indicated criterion-related or known-groups validity • Validation of traditional cutting-score • Factor structure: unifactorial and stable: men and women • Item analyses: different for men and women Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  7. Conclusions • There is still life left! (still relevant) • Appropriate for clinical and research settings • Reliable and valid as a rapid and broadly defined adjustment scale • Convergent validity • Empirically adequate, but is it conceptually adequate? Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  8. Interesting Points • LWMAT has 15 items and each are weighted differently • The concept of rapid assessment tests (What determines “rapid” tests? Number of questions? Difficulty?) • Analysis of LWMAT across genders and types of couples Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  9. Three Weak or Unclear Arguments • Content validity of the LWMAT • Generalizabilty (samples) • The concepts of factor structures vs. factor analyses were not clearly defined or compared Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  10. Your Questions? Your Comments? Your Concerns? Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  11. Our Questions for You • Do you think rapid assessment tests are effective? (Is 15 questions enough?) • Was it wise for the authors to divide 2 of the sample groups into “satisfied” and “unsatisfied” considering the possibility that adjustment and satisfaction might be related? • Do you think an assessment created 30 years ago can adequately measure a 2004 marriage, including same-sex marriages? Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

  12. Thank You Very Much! Freeston, M.H., & Plechaty, M. (1997). Reconsideration of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 81, 419-434.

More Related