1 / 31

Health, Social Roles, and Life Cycle: A Gender Approach in the Tropics

Health, Social Roles, and Life Cycle: A Gender Approach in the Tropics. Karen Watkins UPAEP. Gender and Health. Differences in illnesses and drug use between men and women. Explanations: Biological, socioeconomic, and psychological factors. Biological issues:

aaronasmith
Télécharger la présentation

Health, Social Roles, and Life Cycle: A Gender Approach in the Tropics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health, Social Roles, and Life Cycle: A Gender Approach in the Tropics Karen Watkins UPAEP

  2. Gender and Health • Differences in illnesses and drug use between men and women. • Explanations: Biological, socioeconomic, and psychological factors. • Biological issues: • Women more likely to have infections and mental diseases (Bird and Rieker, 1999; Mechanic, 1995; Bardel et al., 2000; Green and Pope, 1999). • Men possess more chronic disorders; partially explains their lower life expectancy (Macintyre et al., 1996).

  3. Gender and Health • Socioeconomic factors: • Multiple roles associated with womens´ poor health conditions. More stress-related diseases (Bird and Rieker,1999; Brooker and Eakin, 2001) and less leisure time. • Others argue that busy lives imply less symptoms perceived and better health (van Wijk et al.,1999; Janzen and Muhajarine, 2003).

  4. Gender and Health • Socioeconomic factors: • Healthy women are the ones who can have multiple roles. • How do multiple roles relate with health? 1) Stress hypothesis: An additional role implies more stress and deteriorates health; 2) Accumulation hypothesis: Valid only for complementary roles; an additional role improves well-being.

  5. Gender and Health • Socioeconomic factors: • Sexual discrimination both at work and at home are harmful for health (Kawachi et al.,1999; O’Campo et al.,2004; Strazdins et al.,2004). • Less liberty to leave their houses reduces exposure to health services (Vlassoff and Garcia, 2002). • Health relates with power; at a micro level, it depends on household resource allocation.

  6. Gender and Health • Socioeconomic factors: • Studies for developing nations show that paid work betters vulnerable women's´ health: provides control of resources, power, and status. • Negative outcomes on health related to badly paid, sedentary and monotonous jobs, lack of education and economic autonomy, poor political participation and protection, and little free time (van Wijk et al.,1999; Mechanic,1995; Messing et al., 2003). • Status negatively related with mortality (Kawachi et al.,1999); income positively correlates with health.

  7. Gender and Health • Socioeconomic factors: • Differences in social roles: • Men are expected to be strong and suffer without complaint (Vlassoff and Garcia, 2002). • Women expected to protect their families, therefore they pay more attention to symptoms and health (Bardel et al, 2000; Green and Pope, 1999). • More men compared to women have full time jobs; less flexibility to attend medical services (van Wijk et al., 1999).

  8. Gender and Health • Phycological factors: • Women tend to be more pessimistic than men, which is prejudicial for quality of life and health (in particular mental): Brooker and Eakin, 2001. • Women more likely to search for help, follow medical treatments, and preventive services, as well as to adopt the sick role (Green and Pope, 1999).

  9. Objectives • Add a new case study (Costa Rica) to the literature on gender and health. • Provide further robustness to existing hypotheses on health, gender, social roles, quality of life, and life cycle, and add new ideas for future research.

  10. Outline • Gender and health: Surveys on Medication Use 2003, 2004, and 2005. • Female health and multiple roles: Survey on Medication Use 2004. • Female health, life cycle, and well-being: Survey on Medication Use 2005.

  11. Data • Surveys on Medication Use in Costa Rica: 2003, 2004, and 2005. • Self-declaration and measurement of health and medication use. • Administered at the homes of 1000 Costa Rican adults (505 females, 495 males). • Representative sample of Costa Rican population, however not panel.

  12. Methodology • Gender and health: a) Descriptive analysis of self-declared measurement of health and medication use. b) Construction of stress index using factor analysis and score-regression method. c) Linear and non-linear probit models. • Female health and multiple roles: a) Construction of physical and mental illnesses index. b) Dummy variables for social roles and interconnections among them. c) Linear regressions. • Female health, quality of life, and life cycle: a) Descriptive analysis.

  13. Gender and Health -Mostly young. -Low income -Relatively low educational level -Differences in age and education by gender not significant -Income differs, lower for women

  14. Gender and Health -Stress index: migraine, back pain, nervousness, sadness, digestive problems, insomnia. • Women report higher drug • consumption (even controlling for • fertile period). Can be explained with • more incidence of stress-related • symptoms. These decline with age, • partially due to more leisure time. • -Women use relatively more • prescription than over-the-counter • drugs, compared to men. -Low monthly medicine expenditure.

  15. Gender and Health • Equations (ordinal probit models): SRI = 0 + 1Gender + X (1), CD = 0 + 1Gender + X (2), SRI = stress index; CD = consumption of drugs; X= education, income; logarithm of education, logarithm of income; education, income, squared education, squared income

  16. Gender and Health • Results: • Probability to report high incidence of stress-related symptoms and medication use is greater for females. • Income is not related with stress symptoms nor drug consumption. • Highly educated people tend to consume more types of medicines than the rest.

  17. Female Health and Multiple Roles • Physical diseases index: thyroids, arthritis, infectious diseases, cancer, cardiovascular illnesses. • Low correlation between stress index and physical diseases index. • Both health instruments are used as dependent variables.

  18. Female Health and Multiple Roles • Independent variables (social roles): • Employment (ES-1 unemployed, 0 others) • Civil status (CS-1 single, 0 married) • Maternity (MO-1 no children in the home, 0 others) • Interconections: ES*CS, ES*MO, CS*MO, ES*CS*MO

  19. Female Health and Multiple Roles • Control variables: • Family income (Y) • Free time (L) • Job satisfaction (S) • Pregnancy (P)

  20. Female Health and Multiple Roles Equations (linear regressions): (3) (4)

  21. Female Health and Multiple Roles -In general, not having children at home is related with poor physical female health. However, obviously for single women this is not the case. -Job satisfaction (relates with power) is an important explanatory variable for both dependent variables.

  22. Female Health and Multiple Roles -Control role combination: employed, married, with children (R1) -Compared to R1, not having roles favours mental health. More leisure time. -2 roles in general indicate worse physical and mental health, compared to 3 roles: stress symptoms are associated with not having children (for those married and employed women) and being a single mother. -Just 1 role: mixed evidence on its impact on female health.

  23. Female Health, Life Cycle, and Well-being • Life cycle: phase in life (age, maternity, age of children, labour status, civil status, etc.). • Health perception introduced as dependent variable. • Highly correlated with stress index and physical diseases index.

  24. Female Health, Life Cycle, and Well-being • Results: • Health perception is better for young women without children than for those with kids: 2.5% report poor health, compared to 5.0%; 14% report excellent health compared to 7.5%. • Correlation between health perception and having children is particularly negative for young women with kids between 3 and 12 years of age. • For mature and older females, there are no such differences in health perception and maternity.

  25. Female Health, Life Cycle, and Well-being -Most women with kids between 3and 12 years are married, contrary to the rest who in general are single. -Those women with children in this age interval have comparatively lower educational and income levels. -Almost half the women without kids between 3 and 12 years old are students, compared to 70% of the rest who work outside the house..

  26. Female Health, Life Cycle, and Well-being -Young women, without kids from 3 to 12 years of age, report better economic and life satisfaction.

  27. Conclusions • Women use more medicines than men, independently of the life cycle. • Females are more likely to manifest stress symptoms than men. • Drug expenditure does not differ significantly according to gender. • Income is not related with health. Job satisfaction is important. The key is empowerment.

  28. Conclusions • Highly educated people consume more types of medicines than the rest. • In general women with only 1 or 2 roles report worse health than those with multiple roles. It seems that being married, with children, and employed are complementary roles. But lack of roles is also positive for females´ well-being, partially due to more leisure time.

  29. Conclusions • Female health differs significantly for young women with and without kids from 3 to 12 years of age. • This is related to particular socioeconomic differences: those without children in this age interval have more education and better economic conditions (empowerment, job satisfaction).

  30. Acknowledgements This study was financially supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the Merck Company Foundation, the philanthropic arm of Merck & Company Inc., White House Station, New Jersey, USA.

  31. The End Thank you! karen.watkins@upaep.mx

More Related